End Private Property, Not Personal Property

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Shareholders are not making decisions on who gets hired or what anyone besides the CEO gets paid. That is the whole point of a publicly owned company. The employees of the company run it, the shareholders entrust them with near full authority to run it and only have input on major decisions like who the CEO is or if the company should go through a merger/purchase/sale etc. Someone who has shares in a market index fund isn't making hiring/wage calls for the hundreds of companies they own stakes in

Eh...I mean...thats kinda untrue. I get your point though. Depends on the company.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I heard you got 5 bedrooms. Im claiming one of them for the greater good of society. I'll take the master. You enjoy the guest room

I actually LOL'd.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Editorial in the OP is the musing of someone with low aspirations.

Last year I bought my first house. 3600 sq ft, 5 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms on 1/3 an acre of land. I'll be damned if I have to "share it" with someone who did jack shyt to buy it because it's beyond the basic necessities.

And my boss, and his boss, and his boss, and her boss are all employees just like me. They don't own the means of production. Our executives do not make mega bucks and what money they do make is heavily tied to the performance of the company. The people who own the company are getting a pittance.... our margins are in the 2-3% range in a good year, and anybody with ~$40 in their pocket can become a stakeholder today. I'm so sick and tired of having to redress the misconceptions of socialists. I think there are some good ideas to be borne out of socialism but the idea that the most one should be able to own is a Kenny Loggins record is ridiculous and speaks to the low aspirations of people who naively subscribe to these beliefs. It's exhausting

Sounds like a happy "slave" to me





@JahFocus CS still won't address this bullshyt tendency to keep using the word "slave" as if he doesn't know what that truly implies in his socialist maniacal rantings.

 

[tmonster]

the de jure answer of people who never suggest any

ok thanks

 

[tmonster]

I'm not hearing any.

How would you upkeep the properties and with what money?

I'm supposed to pay for Rufus's single family home in west bum fukk?

I didn't think so so how do you propose a force urbanization legally when there already isn't enough houses....


Should we just roll right on to wiping out 30% of the population? I'm all ears.

Haven't given it much thought, but it seems fairly plausible that we can come up with something
at the end of the day, what is the raison d'etre of society?