Way out of my element? nikka, do you know me? You be in the arcadium on the same shyt. nikkas can't have multiple interests? Dudes think because they see someone post about something one place, then that means that's all they know. Stop it.Hold up!
Would you classify me as one of those scared nikkas?
I have a track record of being ready and willing to discuss my philosophy on any controversial topic.
Ad hominem shyt, I love it.
Just a note: you are way out of your element puffing your chest out miles away from the Arcadium where you post passionately about furry video game characters and console wars, Breh. That's your cool area. That's where you eat.
Logical fallacy. What is a random post about a PAWG 5 years ago got to do with this topic, right here? You reaching. Typical Ad Hominem. You're attacking ME and not the argument anymore. This nikka really thought he had some ammo because I said damn she got a phat ass Like wtf? This is the best you had? A comment about a pawg?Here, you can't give one of those, "I'm just" when the debate seat gets hot, my nikka.
Side note: a nikka who would post this...
Is speaking out of the side of their internet anonymous face about whether I'm even black.
Breh...
Go play some fukking video games, nikka.
Both.
This is how you have to operate when fraternizing with white people. It’s unfortunate but it is what it is. No matter how friendly or “understanding” your white friend is, never just give them the benefit of the doubt. Always move in a duplicitous way when among the dominant society, they do the same in your presence. To many nikkas take everything at face value, no critical thinking whatsoever. It scares meThese nikkas must have S/O's that are white or white buddies and don't want to offend them. I have white people I talk to at work. I don't always think "Damn this motherfukker is a white supremacist." But when certain things are said, I see how they act and I think "yeah not surprised" after a while.
I hope to put this in bold.
NOT EVERY WHITE PERSON IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST.
Cool? That should at least comfort some of these scared nikkas.
I don't think every white person is a alt-right, nikka hating cracka. I do believe though that there's varying levels of white supremacists. Some of it is subtle, some of it is overt.
I have a white dude at work who I talk to about games and shyt. He's cool in that regards(a little nerdy and shyt but w/e.)
When the topic in the room(it's a room with me, another black dude, an east asian and another asian.) We all work together. Sometimes the topic between me and the other indian and black dude can be politics.) When that shyt is brought up, the white dude says NOTHING. He ALWAYS jumps into conversations but for this one he's silent. And also there's times where he seems to always talk about not going to specific places.
Those places tend to be black people populated areas.
White supremacy is upheld in large part by downplaying and denying it's existence while simultaneously benefiting from it
ok?
Oh okay so your disagreement is the words used. Okay, white supremacists have a code. There. Not white people. Since saying "white people" opens a big generalization. Miscommunication.
[That, I'm in agreement. And see? You didn't have to ask the cliche "are you even black" a$$hole shyt to reach that conclusion.]
Okay so let's use white supremacists. Now, knowing this and you already agreeing to the fact that white supremacists have a code, you wouldn't say that "being on code" would elude you since the code is to not even talk about this stuff right?
[I would GUESS that white supremacists code is to cause disruption when necessary, back out of arguments they can't win, and avoid exposure.
But funny thing is... They argue amongst themselves...]
A white supremacist coworker on code wouldn't talk about shyt like race and politics knowing that it's a sensitive topic and their racism would come out. which brings me to your next point.
No, it's nothing goofy. You're the one that wanted a resume of a white person before you know if they're actually a white supremacist so I say sorry let's just use the word white supremacist.
You agree that the code is to not talk about the stuff in front of black people right? White supremacists would love this "code" to be extended to all white people therefore its' why when "white people" expose racism they get attacked.
I feel like there's varying levels to white supremacy. White supremacy in of itself is a broad term.
So how is this being a hypocrite? Did I say I do not ever talk to white people? I work with white people. How the fukk can I not ever talk to them? The only one being goofy here is you dog. I feel like you're just slinging random shyt here and seeing what sticks. Do you call the white supremacists with black or non white girlfriends hypocrites? There's white supremacists that work around black people.. Are they hypocrites too in this regard? This is a slippery slope.
If I say "suspected" white supremacists then you'd disagree since you'd just say that's a Tariq like thing to say and I know your thoughts on that. Like I said, it just comes full circle to you sounding like an apologist for even suspected white supremacists.
The Coli should have a chat room to talk about this. The shyt is crystal clear in my head.
Sometimes I may not get that written down to text perfectly. We probably agree on the same thing but the wording is butting heads. I'm not here to shyt on anybody for no reason but I'm just calling it like it is how I see it[To try to act like you didnt come at me disrespectfully by questioning my blackness and end your statement with "I'm not here to shyt on anybody for no reason but I'm ...blah blah blah" is clown shyt.]
It's hilarious.
what?
Well it's not like I can see you. There's some good posers on here. Your angle and position on this topic is just kind of weird.
I said 9 out of 10 white people are on that racist shyt? where did I say "9 out of 10 white people are on that racist shyt?"
After all the bullshyt you've said to try to claim you're in a moral high ground here, you think I'm going lie about what you've said?
dap + rep.Anyway, it's Sunday. I don't think I'll end up agreeing with anything you're saying here. I'll stop responding here. It's a waste of time since I won't convince you nor will you convince me.
Oh, some other thread again.
You're being pedantic. You bring up a post from a hot topic about a racist incident, to focus on me saying that most white people probably feel that way? Is that really the hill you're wanting to die on?
I'm more so concerned of your obsession with this "objectivity" to be held when the topic is about white people and racism. The same people you're trying to be wholly objective with and not generalize, probably don't give a fukk about you but yet you're holding black folks on the Coli to some holy standard with your "hoping Coli nikkas are objective and consistent"Or lying now when you say only the white supremacists are?
Either way... Yes, there should be an objective chat room so we could all debate about this shyt.
I just hope nikkas stay consistent.
I'm thinking like a "white man" because I'm trying to make sure the Coli stays objective meanwhile the clowns of the coli will interpret it as caping for white people that I really could give a fukk about.
?
Breh... You're being inconsistent again.Oh, some other thread again.
Yeah, most white people probably feel that way.
You're being pedantic. You bring up a post from a hot topic about a racist incident, to focus on me saying that most white people probably feel that way? Is that really the hill you're wanting to die on?
Me saying 95% of white people probably feel that way from my ASSUMPTION, and saying not all white people are white supremacists aren't mutually exclusive.
I'm more so concerned of your obsession with this "objectivity" to be held when the topic is about white people and racism. The same people you're trying to be wholly objective with and not generalize, probably don't give a fukk about you but yet you're "hoping Coli nikkas are objective and consistent"
The irony here is you don't see the bullshyt in what you're saying.Breh... You're being inconsistent again.
You said you're done.
You don't have to wonder about my stance, I've always checked bullshyt when I find it on this site that I love to post in and in any topic I have time to post about.
I'm not protecting privileged white society.
I'm simply calling out bullshyt. I happened to see bullshyt and you were in cross fire. Wipe yourself off and enjoy your Sunday.
rep + dap.
No seriously. your fighting tooth and nail to make sure black people don't say mean things or sweep white people in one fell swoop. I can't fault a man for saying you're doing an awful lot of
for white people.
Institutional racism and dialogue related to it is too important for extreme and often contradictory premises.No seriously. your fighting tooth and nail to make sure black people don't say mean things or sweep white people in one fell swoop. I can't fault a man for saying you're doing an awful lot of
This isn't an academic setting where we're talking numbers and stats and having a intelligent discourse on the actual, historic events of disenfranchisement of black folks in the US.
Pulling up random out of context posts to push them here in a "gotcha!" moment is silly.
You're not really doing nothing graceful here. That's why I find your stance hilarious.
