Facebook turned on feature that confirmed many pro-Trump pages are run from outside the US
- Thread starter tru_m.a.c
- Start date
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
I listened to A. Jones yesterday.
They are using word games. They are connecting small groups that have nothing in common actually based overseas, to a large website like Infowars based in the U.S.
The guy from Switzerland is a field reporter for InfoWars. They are starting an Infowars Europe bureau. Buzzfeed/FB are making the claim that uploading a story to Infowars social media pages, somehow makes Infowars a foreign owned or managed site.
A. Jones made the point it's the equivalent of CNN having a foreign correspondent in Singapore or Brazil. We know CNN is pro-Hillary, so if they have reporters upload stories is CNN a Brazilian managed company?
Here's the interview A. Jones had with the Swiss based reporter, Dan Lyman. He is American too. They admit he is an admin for the Infowars web pages. Buzzfeed did this original article, and now Facebook is saying they are going to ban his FB page for having basically a foreign based correspondent upload stories, but making it seem like that equates to "foreign run"
.
Starts @2:00, pretty much explains everything within 2 minutes
@10:00 Dan Lyman makes 3 solid points
1) The Buzzdeed article is written by 2 Canadians, so is that website foreign owned now?
2) Paul Joseph Watson has been with Infowars for 15+ years, from and based in Britain. Was Infowar managed by foreign power for 15 years, because Watson uploaded stories to their site.
3) FB talks about and supports global citizenry, so why are they suddenly going berserk over "global citizens" sharing information?
So if you want to hear both sides of what OP just posted, here you go.
They are using word games. They are connecting small groups that have nothing in common actually based overseas, to a large website like Infowars based in the U.S.
The guy from Switzerland is a field reporter for InfoWars. They are starting an Infowars Europe bureau. Buzzfeed/FB are making the claim that uploading a story to Infowars social media pages, somehow makes Infowars a foreign owned or managed site.
A. Jones made the point it's the equivalent of CNN having a foreign correspondent in Singapore or Brazil. We know CNN is pro-Hillary, so if they have reporters upload stories is CNN a Brazilian managed company?
Here's the interview A. Jones had with the Swiss based reporter, Dan Lyman. He is American too. They admit he is an admin for the Infowars web pages. Buzzfeed did this original article, and now Facebook is saying they are going to ban his FB page for having basically a foreign based correspondent upload stories, but making it seem like that equates to "foreign run"
.Starts @2:00, pretty much explains everything within 2 minutes
@10:00 Dan Lyman makes 3 solid points
1) The Buzzdeed article is written by 2 Canadians, so is that website foreign owned now?
2) Paul Joseph Watson has been with Infowars for 15+ years, from and based in Britain. Was Infowar managed by foreign power for 15 years, because Watson uploaded stories to their site.
3) FB talks about and supports global citizenry, so why are they suddenly going berserk over "global citizens" sharing information?
So if you want to hear both sides of what OP just posted, here you go.
Last edited:
LeVraiPapi
Redemption is Coming
I listened to A. Jones yesterday.
They are using word games.
The guy from Switzerland is a field reporter for InfoWars. They are starting Infowars Europe bureau. Buzzfeed/FB are making the claim that uploading a story to the website, somehow makes Infowars a foreign owned or managed site.
A. Jones made the point it's the equivalent of CNN having a foreign correspondent in Singapore or Brazil. We know CNN is pro-Hillary, so if they have reporters upload stories is CNN a Brazilian managed company?
Here's the interview A. Jones had with the Swiss based reporter, Dan Lyman. He is American too. Buzzfeed did this original article, and now Facebook is saying they are going to ban his FB page for having basically a foreign based correspondent upload stories, but making it seem like they are "foreign run"
Starts @2:00, pretty much explains everything within 2 minutes
So if you want to hear both sides of what OP just posted, here you go.
I don't know if you know what this means, but posting a story on a site would not show the site is run from that location. It's either servers or admin login. Why have a server in Africa, Mexico when those places are not know for IT ?
:Russianbreh:
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
It actually isn't the website It's FB webpage the stories were being loaded too.
Still....just think....every large news organization has foreign correspondents....what exactly are they trying to say, that every other organization doesn't do.
Plus, they are playing mind games, equating actual foreign based websites with one based in the U.S.hey night be Trump supporting. Then they threw in a Native American FB page based in Kosovo..
....ok what? 
.If FB wants to have transparency with their webpages, cool, but to invoke like they just uncovered some nefarious plot with every foreign based FB page is not logical.
Let's turn this around. Obama got love from all across the African Diaspora. They loved him like he was their President in Brazil. You Know Damn Well There Are/Were Multiple Pro-Barack Brazilian based FB group pages. Group pages that Americans may not have known were Brazilian based. Should FB have shut down or if Michelle runs do they need to censor her international fan pages?
You see how Buzzfeed/FB are playing politics right now?
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
So you only want one side of this story?
You gone upload this story to your brain and then not realize, their version is heavily flawed.
LeVraiPapi
Redemption is Coming
I always listen to both sides and make my own judgment as well, but you would never catch me listening to no damn Alex Jones. That's a violation of my black card alone. There are better YouTubers that stay in the middle or I can make up my own mind.
He's a "black" "free thinker" who has been one of the leading vooices of conspiracy theories on this website. Don't mind his stupidity.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Ok. Says a moderator holding up the banner of a Conspiracy Theory for 18 months, with zero evidence, that Trump/Russia hacked the DNC, hacked the 2016 election, and used social media to fool millions of Americans, even though majority of Americans didn't vote for him.
That type of conspiracy theory? Gotcha.
Last edited:
LeVraiPapi
Redemption is Coming
Be black and let right-wing racists and anti-Black conspiracy theorists be your voice of reason, brehs?
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Be black and let right-wing racists and anti-Black conspiracy theorists be your voice of reason, brehs?
If A. Jones talks about organic food over GMO is that right-wing?
If he talks about not wanting Don Cheeto to attack Syria is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about not wanting BHO and HillRod to attack Libya is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about chemicals in water is that racist?
If he talks about the Social Credit Score System in China, called Sesame Credit, being an example of what is being prepped in the U.S. is that right wing racist?
If he talks about protecting the Bill of Rights is that racist?
Last edited: