Fears of societal collapse prompt new push for babies in Japan

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
63,244
Reputation
9,672
Daps
172,959

np_file_218408.jpeg

The government will be unveiling a major policy package on child care support later this week. | BLOOMBERG

BY ISABEL REYNOLDS, EMI URABE AND MARIKA KATANUMA
BLOOMBERG

Mar 28, 2023

Alarmed by an even faster-than-expected slide in the number of babies born last year, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is preparing a policy package he says is a last chance to keep society functioning.

Ideas like compulsory paternity leave, canceling student debt for people who have a baby, and ¥10 million ($76,445) payouts for a third child have been thrown around in recent weeks. While some of these are controversial and won’t make it into the final program, Kishida has promised measures "on a different dimension” from previous efforts.


As part of the fresh attempt at tackling the issue, a new agency devoted to children and families is set to open its doors April 1, and the government will lay out a path to double spending on them by June. Kishida has begun floating some of the proposals and more details are expected by the end of the month.

Japan is not alone in its problems — China’s population has also begun to fall, and South Korea has a lower fertility rate — but it is further along the road, with more than 29% of its people age 65 or above. Last year marked a record low number of births and a fall of about 0.6% in the total population.

Failure to put the brakes on a slide that will naturally accelerate as the number of women in the fertile age range shrinks won’t just hamper economic growth, but could trigger a collapse in the pension system and leave already-stretched fields like health care and defense without sufficient staff, Masako Mori, an adviser to Kishida, warned in March.

The prime minister on March 17 began to unveil some of his ideas on encouraging people to have babies, saying the country has only a few more years to remedy a “national crisis.”

f89736e738f094cba4c37d98ff139fc49c7897ab.jpg

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (center) visits a child care facility in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, on March 11. | POOL / VIA KYODO

Kishida is seeking to spread the burden of child care, in many cases borne almost exclusively by mothers, to fathers and the broader community. He’s introducing new subsidies meant to prompt 85% of fathers to take paternity leave by 2030, compared with the current 14%.

“When we reach the 2030s, the number of young people will plunge at double the current pace,” if trends continue, he said in outlining policies aimed at changing the “structure and consciousness of society.”

Women perform the vast majority of unpaid labor in Japan, at about 3 hours and 45 minutes a day, compared with 40 minutes for men, according to data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Women get less sleep than their counterparts in any other country surveyed. Japan also tops the OECD rankings in terms of the proportion of women who never have children.

“The root of the whole problem is that men and corporations haven’t seen the issue of raising children as their own problem,” said Shiro Yamasaki, an adviser to the Cabinet, who was previously a senior official at the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare. “If that doesn’t change, there will be no solution.”

The recent experience of other countries, however, indicates that more government support and gender equity doesn’t always guarantee more babies. Long-steady fertility rates in Nordic countries, which research has attributed to social policies, have fallen in recent years.

7513010cf5d8650beae2e4be6643417e60a59351.jpg

A staffer delivers free diapers to a household with a baby in Akashi, Hyogo Prefecture, under a program to support child-rearing. | AKASHI CITY / VIA KYODO

Kishida also plans to tackle low incomes among young people, many of whom are in irregular work that pays poorly and doesn’t come with full social benefits. Salaries for people in their thirties shifted downward over the 20 years from 1997-2017, according to government data.

“Lack of stability is a big issue for men,” Mary Brinton, professor of sociology at Harvard University, said in a March presentation. “Social mores are that men should be able to support a family.”

Concerns about income prospects may not be limited to men — a study by Daiwa Institute of Research found that fertility rates have been rising over the past decade among women in full-time jobs, while they have begun to fall among those who work only part-time, or not at all.

“Salary levels for new graduates have hardly changed in 30 years, while the percentage starting off in irregular jobs has been increasing. People can’t be enthusiastic about having many children when they think about education costs,” Bloomberg economist Yuki Masujima said.

While the number of foreign residents in Japan hit a record of just over 3 million at the end of last year, up more than 11% on the previous year, immigration doesn’t currently look likely to make up the shortfall.

A radical approach could be the only chance of success, given the failure of three decades of more gradual attempts to turn the trend around, like improving access to child care.
Harvard’s Brinton called in a March presentation for four to six weeks of paternity leave on full pay to be made compulsory. Kazumasa Oguro, a professor at Hosei University and former Finance Ministry official, proposed a cash payment of ¥10 million for couples who have a third child.

“It’s hard to escape the gravitational pull of the falling birthrate with half measures,” Oguro said in an interview.
 

Windows 91

Obsolete
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
10,860
Reputation
2,997
Daps
43,975
Reppin
C:\
They're in a population death spiral. I wonder how bad it'll get to have them encourage increased immigration. shyt, they'd probably just let themselves die out before they'd allow hordes of Indians and Chinese to come up in there.
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
12,887
Reputation
4,215
Daps
62,997
They need more than child care incentives, they need a complete restructure of how jobs operate. Japanese men work more than just about anyone in the world. They need to work a lot less in order to even have time to start relationships and have children.




I hate when people default to the money issue . It sounds right but it's not backed by evidence. The more money I give you , the less likely you are to actually have kids .


Keep in mind their birthrate was already trash in their golden age in the 80s, and early 90s BEFORE WAGE STAGNATION. They haven't had a replacement birthrate since they were broke in the 60s and early 70s.There is a direct correlation between their country getting more money , and their birthrates falling off a cliff .


Beyond Japan, I always raise the peculiar case of the Scandinavian countries. All of these countries gave the world a real life test case for what happens when you spend more money on people and make it easier for them economically to have children. Do you know what the results of this social projects were? Failure. Those Scandinavian countries are spending the most on each of their citizens than any other country on earth. They have more social benefits, more child care benefits, more family leave, lower work hours, etc than every other Nation on Earth but despite pumping more and more money at the problem their birth rates are still dropping. Keep in mind they have already instituted all the reforms you could possibly suggest.


Money is not the solution. Making people's lives comfortable is not the solution either. Because people with lots of money who are comfortable do not prioritize childbirth.


It's an ideological issue, not a financial one. People just do not prioritize children when they are wealthy. You have a better return on investment by importing poor people who still value children based on their prior environment.
 
Last edited:
Top