probably got a picture with a White moon on its IG..![]()
Gotta keep that dark side hidden if you want people to look up at you![]()
probably got a picture with a White moon on its IG..![]()
Gotta keep that dark side hidden if you want people to look up at you![]()
Because it's not a solid 3 dimensional object imo@ocmfII @xCivicx @Hannibal Fox @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited @MMS
whats on the other side of the moon..
and, why do we only see one side of the moon..![]()
Gotta keep that dark side hidden if you want people to look up at you![]()
Yeah they were reverse engineering concepts and equations to make them fit into heliocentric theory instead of conducting actual scientific testing in the real worldThe point is that there’s some backing to his way of thinking. The quote clearly shows that Tesla thought scientists were coming up with mathematical equations to fit what they wanted to see and not what they were actually seeing.
I know you're trolling but this is actually facts when it comes to the moonThere's only one side of a hologram
And he also developed a form of wireless energy transfer and alternating current, as well as damm near free electrical energyIt tells me that he was a bit of a pompous ass towards the end of his career.
Also later in 1935 when speaking with The New York Times, Tesla was critical of Einstein stating that his theory of relativity was “a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king” and “a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense… the theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors…. its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”
Again I can see why tesla is a saint to flat earthers. He also denied quantum mechanics and existence of the electron.
Oh?...Because it's a sphere, and there's a molten core at the center of the earth![]()
By this illogic, "light refraction" should disrupting our view of the sun and moon damn near all the timeThis is a lie. It's not "impossible". It was thought to be impossible (Seeing a lunar eclipse and the sun at the same time), but there are a few reasons why this is entirely possible in heliocentric theory:
-Light refraction is the reason why selenhelion eclipses occur. (Our atmosphere refracts light and makes it seem like some objects are in a different place than they actually are).
You know, the same thing you observe in 3rd-4th grade science when you stick your pencil in to a cup of water and it looks as though the submerged part is in a different position. :martinbp:
-Selenhelion eclipses, when they do occur, aren't observable everywhere where the lunar eclipse is visible.
-Selenhelion eclipses are only visible for a short period time.
Simpleton. :bpmjtf:
Oh?
So you've been to the molten core?
How was it?

Gotta keep that dark side hidden if you want people to look up at you![]()
You stupiddo you have information supporting these facts..?I know you're trolling but this is actually facts when it comes to the moon

By this illogic, "light refraction" should disrupting our view of the sun and moon damn near all the time

Atmospheric refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher in the sky than they are in reality.
For example: when you see the sun sitting on the horizon, it is not there really. It's actually below the edge of the horizon, but our atmosphere acts like a lens and bends the sun's image just above the horizon, allowing us to see it.
This effect actually lengthens the amount of daylight for several minutes or more each day; we end up seeing the sun for a few minutes in the morning before it has actually risen and for a few extra minutes in the evening after it actually already has set.

Funny how it only happens when an impossibility within heliocentric theory occurs

Once a variable pops up that you can't explain with the flat earth model, you either ignore it or call it fake. 
Shifting landmasses creating pressure points, similar to earthquakes imoWhere volcanoes come from?![]()
Shifting landmasses creating pressure points, similar to earthquakes imo
Because you're speaking gibberish...Exactly. It does.
Why is this hard to understand?![]()