Flat Earthers.....HOLD THIS L!!!!!!!!!!

-G$-

...fresh outta fux...
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,267
Reputation
3,827
Daps
22,435
probably got a picture with a White moon on its IG.. :lupe:

Gotta keep that dark side hidden if you want people to look up at you :mjpls:

tenor.gif
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
25,147
Reputation
2,958
Daps
80,605
Reppin
Atl
The point is that there’s some backing to his way of thinking. The quote clearly shows that Tesla thought scientists were coming up with mathematical equations to fit what they wanted to see and not what they were actually seeing.
Yeah they were reverse engineering concepts and equations to make them fit into heliocentric theory instead of conducting actual scientific testing in the real world
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
25,147
Reputation
2,958
Daps
80,605
Reppin
Atl
It tells me that he was a bit of a pompous ass towards the end of his career.



Also later in 1935 when speaking with The New York Times, Tesla was critical of Einstein stating that his theory of relativity was “a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king” and “a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense… the theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors…. its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”


Again I can see why tesla is a saint to flat earthers. He also denied quantum mechanics and existence of the electron.
And he also developed a form of wireless energy transfer and alternating current, as well as damm near free electrical energy

If anyone is an authority to speak on electromagnetism, its him
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
25,147
Reputation
2,958
Daps
80,605
Reppin
Atl
This is a lie. It's not "impossible". It was thought to be impossible (Seeing a lunar eclipse and the sun at the same time), but there are a few reasons why this is entirely possible in heliocentric theory:

-Light refraction is the reason why selenhelion eclipses occur. (Our atmosphere refracts light and makes it seem like some objects are in a different place than they actually are).
You know, the same thing you observe in 3rd-4th grade science when you stick your pencil in to a cup of water and it looks as though the submerged part is in a different position. :martinbp:

-Selenhelion eclipses, when they do occur, aren't observable everywhere where the lunar eclipse is visible.
-Selenhelion eclipses are only visible for a short period time.

Simpleton. :bpmjtf:
By this illogic, "light refraction" should disrupting our view of the sun and moon damn near all the time

Funny how it only happens when an IMPOSSIBILITY within heliocentric theory occurs

You stay copying my posting style though. I feel flattered to have so many fans
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,528
Reputation
10,937
Daps
74,834
Reppin
Wakanda
By this illogic, "light refraction" should disrupting our view of the sun and moon damn near all the time

...Exactly. It does. :dwillhuh:

Atmospheric refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher in the sky than they are in reality.

For example: when you see the sun sitting on the horizon, it is not there really. It's actually below the edge of the horizon, but our atmosphere acts like a lens and bends the sun's image just above the horizon, allowing us to see it.

This effect actually lengthens the amount of daylight for several minutes or more each day; we end up seeing the sun for a few minutes in the morning before it has actually risen and for a few extra minutes in the evening after it actually already has set.

Why is this hard to understand? :dwillhuh:

Funny how it only happens when an impossibility within heliocentric theory occurs

You're just mad that heliocentric, spherical earth models account for all the phenomena that we observe. :russ:

Geocentric, flat earth models can't explain sh*t. :russ: Once a variable pops up that you can't explain with the flat earth model, you either ignore it or call it fake. :russ:
 
Last edited:

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
25,147
Reputation
2,958
Daps
80,605
Reppin
Atl
...Exactly. It does. :dwillhuh:



Why is this hard to understand? :dwillhuh:
Because you're speaking gibberish

Light refraction doesnt cause an object to appear as if it's on the exact opposite side of the sky

And if you watched that selenhelion video I posted in here you would know that you're posting nonsense
 
Top