I think there's a distinction between "best" and "most important" or "most valuable". Steph was unarguably Golden State's best player, but definitely more subjective when you talk most valuable, particularly in that series/matchup.
Agreed, that's just silly.
91, wasn't Worthy hurt? That was an old Lakers team, I think MJ would've still beat them.
98 yeah, but you can't make a serious argument the Pip could've won either of those series without Jordan.
Strongly disagree with this. Iggy defends Bron better than anybody in the league. Without him Bron might have dropped 40ppg. He was the only Cav who could even get to the rim, so Green's rim protection was relatively unimportant and he didn't have to do anything but box out when Thompson was on the floor because he was pretty much zero offensive threat.
Yeah, the Cavs basically had to concede open shots to Iggy, but if he doesn't shoot 50% from the field and 40% from 3 they would've been in trouble. No doubt Steph's greatness opened the door for that, but he still had to perform.
Good point, but that's kind of abstract when you talk about mvp of a series. Everybody knows how Steph makes everyone around him better simply by being on the court.
Granted a lot of this is just circumstantial, if Warriors beat a healthy Cavs team Steph is obviously going to be MVP, but they simply didn't need him to be Steph against a short-handed Cavs team. I mean its not like the coli GSW hate convention voted for Finals MVP, it was the same media that LOVES Steph.
One thing we do agree on, is that this thread while true is just a Steph/GSW hate thread, main reason I didn't post in here until now.