- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,394
- Reputation
- -10,636
- Daps
- 22,236
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
Once again, why are you talking like if you know wtf you talking about? You're a casual, you spend 15min on a game then base everything else on what forum fanboys say. You spend 100hrs a day here, you claim to get every game, you don't have time to do everything you claim you do and now you're being exposed for being a online bullshytterTitanfall 2 is absolutely better than halo 5 but it's no secret that you, just like any other obnoxious Stan, will continue to default to the console exclusive game. Halo 5 while being a good game, is widely hated by fans of the series as "not being halo" and they have every reason to. Your embarrassing yourself with all this damage control. Take a breath and relax breh.
I'll further demonstrate...Thank you for exposing that clown. Yes, lots of people LOVE Titanfall 2 (even more than Halo 5) but that doesn't make what he said about Halo remotely true. People can love more than one game Kamikazee Casual...No, it's not.
Halo 5 is regarded the best halo game in a while and the community on Xbox is still much larger than titanfall 2.
Most of the hate Halo 5 gets is due to the story and new character
With that said I like titanfall 2 better. I thought TF1 was great then I thought Halo took the crown. But Titanfall 2 kills both of them imo. Game is so much fun.
The multiplayer is incredibly deep, filled with Content. Something Halo has been KNOWN for and has upped the anti bigtime. But since you don't play, you don't know. When its competition Killzone dropped, you was here talking about how it was the best game ever, so beautifulHalo 5 is the best game this entire gen. MP is inimitable, peerless and absolutely breathtaking. There's no way a game that's also available for another platform is better. You need to wake up and smell the café breh.
Remember the free content Goldenglove would talk so glowing about. Halo content is free by the way
Since its not on PS4 tho, lets focus on the fanboys and the Halo purist who hated every halo after H2 (H3 was half loved by that group) 
Here he exposes himself as the casual since he's using lines that were made famous on the internet. Did you know the PS3 was like taking a girl out to a fine restaurant? The xbox 360 with its more powerful graphics card? Less powerful!!!Most of the hate Halo 5 gets is not based on the story. It's on how they moved the gameplay to call of duty in space.
YOU THEN REPEATED THAT BULLshyt LIKE THE REST OF YOUR PEERS HERE, YOU STILL THE SAME DUDE

(ppl.. think for yourselves one of these days...)
Bruh, since you a casual you probably didn't know this but Halo 4 was hated by way more gamers than Halo 5. Halo 4 was universally not LOVED. I thought it was cool, fun. But Halo 5 shyts all over it. It improved it, now its its own beast. The people you swear by, the clowns who don't want things to change? THey haven't been playing Halo 5 after they deemed it not worthy. Meanwhile the game continues to evolve and get better. So why don't you actually partake or.... well, you're a casual so wait til somebody like Rekkapryde hypes up the next title so you can play that for 3days like everyone else...I'm not saying the multiplayer isn't good, or that the game is bad, or that the game itself is bad. I'm saying there is a large community that followed halo religiously from day one that can't stand halo 5 because of how far removed the gameplay is from the first 4. Halo 2 is regarded as the best of the series by a lot of people. I'm absolutely certain you are well aware of this.
Basically you didn't like the story, could have saved yourself 30mins of posting bruhLong post coming. Feel free to skip if you got a short attention span.
Locke has plenty of potential, a cool voice, a strong presence, and top 3 spartan armor that I've been trying to unlock since day one for multiplayer (Emile from reach is up there with him and the chief), but they explored his motivations so poorly that it made him unrelatable. Halo 5 gets hate due to its changing of the art style in my opinion for one. The elites look and walk and talk more like brutes now.
There are too many Spartans now. We went from the chief being the last one left in halo 3 to now there's at least 9 between palmer and the two fire teams. This also meant no marines you fight alongside in the campaign too.
The weapon sounds changed, most notably the battle rifle, the pistol, the shotgun, the sword, and the rocket launcher. They changed the look of weapons when people didn't want them. The storm rifle, the battle rifle, the fuel rod cannon, and the smg. Aiming down the sights and sprint and thrusters and clambering and the charge and ground pound are cool features, but they don't belong in a halo game. This makes it feel more like call of duty or destiny than it does halo just as much as the change of art style does. There was no reason to change what the scorpion and wraiths looks like.
The campaign was a mess too. Who is the main character? Locke never feels like that guy, but you play as him in 12 of the 15 missions. The warden isn't really the main antagonist is he? He exists solely to prolong the campaign. You fight seven wardens in the campaign. The levels are too linear with no room to explore and be amazed at the scenery like you were in the first three and even in halo 4 to an extent when you were outdoors. You have to read way too many books and watch too many short films separate from the game to know who these people are and what's going on. None of the characters get fleshed out because there are too many of them. Even the dialogue is bad in this game compared to how people talk in the previous 4 games. Halo had the chief, Cortana, captain Keyes, and Johnson. That's it. Halo 2 had chief, Johnson, Cortana, Keyes, the arbiter, Tartarus, the prophets, and hood while managing to flesh out all of them. Halo 3 had chief, Johnson, Keyes, the arbiter, and truth. Halo 4 explored the dynamic between chief and Cortana. Laskey got a little bit of depth at least. Back to halo 5 now. Who in the campaign did anything of importance or felt essential? If you removed palmer or Halsey or Roland (the AI of the infinity) or the arbiter, what does this game miss out on? If you remove buck and vale and Tanaka from fireteam Osiris and remove Fred and Kelly and Linda from blue team (once again buck was the only one who made his debut in a halo game as opposed to a book or movie), what does the game lose?
Does anyone like the idea of Cortana being the villain now? Halo 4 had its problems but I thought it told a great story and that Jen Taylor really knocked it out of the park with her performance in halo 4. This cheapens everything her character has done to this point. Why not have jul mdama be the main bad guy instead of kill him off in the first level? Why is so much of the story explained in dialogue between the characters in levels instead of cutscenes to make things carry weight? Cutscenes should never be action sequences like the openings of each of the first two levels?
Why are the prometheans still here and what are they fighting for if the didact is gone (side note I'm still skeptical that he's dead. We saw him fall into that thing but we didn't see him die)? Worst of all, is that the marketing of this game lied to us. They gave us the okie doke, the hesitation stop and go move, the double move on the post route, the UTEP two step killer crossover.
It was marketed around the conflict between Locke and the chief. That he had gone awol or turned and Locke was supposed to hunt him down and we didn't know the backstory behind this to add to the mystery. We weren't supposed to know what the deal is with the guardians so early in the game and chief wasn't supposed to go absent in such an anticlimactic fashion. The final mission didn't have an exciting climax either. Think about what all the ads gave us and what we actually got. Locke was supposed to be boba fett chasing his target and instead we got a short conversation with a poorly coordinated fight and then right afterwards it becomes a rescue mission to save the chief. 343 really fukked up the campaign badly. Go back and play the campaign of the first 4 games and see how much better each is in regards to the story it tells. I'm almost certain at some point they switched up what they were doing late in the development of the game. No other explanation makes sense.if you stuck it out and read this whole thing.
The PS3 sucked, but the media features is what you guys swore by. Now you don't have the same functionality and you like 'I never cared about it"Media Player? Lol These are gaming systems not media players.
EA Access is trash with no games. Got the most powerful console of all time coming out with nothing to play on it![]()
And EA Acess sucks.. well PSNOW is getting PS4 games so good luck with that

So after the long hate filled speech, you return with how fun the gameplay isOh the gameplay is fun for sure. That was never the issue. The problem is feeling more like call of duty or destiny than the og trilogy. Some art changes are ok, but so many things changed. Even how the promethean weapons work changed. The elites and grunts should not have changed. The grunts being humorous and non threatening is a key part of what made them memorable. The elites being elegant and sleek while speaking and fighting in a dignified manner is a big part of their characteristics. There's some things that there was no reason to change. Think about the two scenes in mcc with Locke and the arbiter. His elites had the halo 1-3 armor and spoke in a very eloquent manner. There's some things that don't need to be changed because they're good the way they are and there's little if anything to be gained from changing them.
I guess that doesn't matter anymore?Game is incredibly fun imo...
I've stated it because its fact. Name a sony sequel that was better than its predecessorsYou've never seen anyone on the coli state that Xbox sequels get better and PS4 sequels get worse?
Have you beaten halo 5 and Titanfall 2?

While you try to figure that out, let me show you what I mean...
Halo 5 does not have the best campaign in the series, but the multiplayer? Yes imo. I'd play H5 today over H2 online, and if you look at the online communities, then my opinion is the popular one (fukk akademik)

Gears 4 has a great campaign, debateable on if its the best or not but its not way behind if you didn't love it
THe multiplayer IS the best in the series
Forza 6, Forza Horizon 2/3 have all exceeded their previous efforts
Killzone, Uncharted, Infamous, and even this recently look at GT have all been

The hype that is conjured here is pathetic. And the fact this community has hyped, bought, still hyped, then later acted as if they didn't do all of that is why I can't take the "general" concensus seriously. Because generally speaking its been pure fanboy shyt in here. Go head and name 3 sequels for me bruh bruh...

if you stuck it out and read this whole thing.
@PS4 finding it impossible to believe I do anything I claim because of his inability to do a tenth of what I do. Check my gamer tags. I don't have to lie to kick it. You'll see games being played, not Netflix trophies. I won't go through what I do daily cause it'll come off as bragging and condescending and I'm not with that. Id rather build people up. If you wanna talk games, the evidence is online for all to see. Revsincere is the PSN and KamikazeRevy is the XBL. I do plenty outside of gaming as well. There's 24 hours in a day and if you know how to manage your time that's more than enough to pursue everything you're interested in.