Gary Johnson's Presidential Campaign is Over

Pitfalls0117

Invokana Trump
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
3,454
Reputation
1,190
Daps
13,147
Reppin
NJ->BOS->DC
@DEAD7 what is Aleppo? :jbhmm:
Gary Johnson was actually confused because he was thinking about the relationship between signifiers and what they signify, words and objects, and generally, the struggle to arbitrarily affix meaning to combinations of syllables. He's a big Wittgenstein enthusiast.
:troll:
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
Who the fukk cares what Aleppo is called. The question would've been the same had the host just said "Syria." I bet like 10% of Americans tops could name it.
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,820
Reppin
Everywhere
Who the fukk cares what Aleppo is called. The question would've been the same had the host just said "Syria." I bet like 10% of Americans tops could name it.
How are you running for president, damn near 10% in the polls, and not know about something that's been a big deal in the world since 2011-2012?

Standards are low with Trump and Clinton but there's no excuse for Gary.
 
Last edited:

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,978
Daps
23,337
Reppin
W/S 416
That's fine, but the size of Aleppo really isn't the issue. The issue is whether knowing what Aleppo is somehow disqualifies Gary Johnson from the presidency. It's really not that big a deal. Much more important is Gary Johnson's approach to foreign policy in general, which is principled noninterventionism.

You're basically saying foreign affairs is not that big of a deal
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
How are you running for president, damn near 10% in the polls, and not know about something that's been a big deal in the world since 2011-2012?

Standards are low with Trump and Clinton but there's no excuse for Gary.

The city of Aleppo hasn't been a big deal in most of the world ever. ISIS? Syria? Assad? Sure. Aleppo? No.

Why are there higher standards for Gary?

This is starting to feel like a hit job.
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,640
Daps
17,487
You're basically saying foreign affairs is not that big of a deal

I'm saying that knowing where Aleppo is should not be as important as your vision for America's foreign relationships in general. Certainly not disqualifying.
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,820
Reppin
Everywhere
The city of Aleppo hasn't been a big deal in most of the world ever. ISIS? Syria? Assad? Sure. Aleppo? No.

Why are there higher standards for Gary?

This is starting to feel like a hit job.
All you have to do is read an article on the Syrian Civil War and it will mention the center of the conflict. Like seriously, it'd be pretty hard to find one that doesn't. So to me it just looks like Gary's Libertarian views on foreign affairs is his shield to not actually need to have real knowledge there. Since the main candidates are so awful and have been given pass after pass the uproar may seem unfair but it's just troubling that a candidate for president doesn't have that knowledge. Makes you wonder what else he doesn't know about.
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,640
Daps
17,487
He pointed out more about its importance than just its size:aicmon:

Does being a non-interventionist preclude one from being knowledgeable about a major, ongoing world event? I don't get it. If that were his approach, I want an explanation on why his policy recommendation fits in each situation. Saying bullshyt about how we should not get involved in anything outside our borders (which is a ridiculous notion no matter what your foreign policy stance is) is just letting yourself off the hook for doing your homework.

The man himself said it was a blunder. Why the fukk are you out here :cape:ing for this nonsense?

Aleppo is not an event. If you asked Gary Johnson what his position was on the Syrian Civil War, I'm sure his answer would have been far more knowledgeable. Or at least as knowledgeable (read: politically correct) as the other major candidates.
 

ADevilYouKhow

Rhyme Reason
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
38,757
Reputation
1,458
Daps
65,131
Reppin
got a call for three nines
Aleppo is not an event. If you asked Gary Johnson what his position was on the Syrian Civil War, I'm sure his answer would have been far more knowledgeable. Or at least as knowledgeable (read: politically correct) as the other major candidates.

How do you figure?

:laff:

Pathetic Breh
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
Aleppo is not an event. If you asked Gary Johnson what his position was on the Syrian Civil War, I'm sure his answer would have been far more knowledgeable. Or at least as knowledgeable (read: politically correct) as the other major candidates.
He can't have a real position if he doesn't know any of the detail of what is going on there. Anything else is simply bullshyt pandering.
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
This is the problem with idiots and politics. If a person doesn't know or care about a situation, it isn't a fukking virtue for a candidate for the presidency to have the same level of knowledge as the average person on the street. People complain that politicians are awful, but have the lowest possible standards for them:scust:
 
Top