There is nothing to defend. People on both sides take this hypocritical stance:
1) Drake is supposedly not to be taken serious as a rapper because he's considered a "Pop star".
2) Ghostwriting in Hip Hop is a cardinal sin
If we take both statements to be true, then
1) Drake having writers should not be an issue given most Pop stars have writers and this is understood.
2) If this was such a "no no", no one would be given a pass no matter how great he or she claimed to be. The condition isn't what the artists thinks or what the perception of the media or masses think, it is the culture that matters. So if it is culturally acceptable for all these women and men to have writers, we can't cherry pick who gets a pass or who doesn't.
Also, the hypocritical stance on this is the mental gymnastics of "well as long as they didn't write X for Y, then I'm good" as it pertains to elite MC's.
The facts:
Ghostwriting exists in Hip Hop and passes have been handed out (prior to Drake's exposal). Some have gotten passes because they produced. Others got passes because they were females. Others got passes because they weren't considered greats (but the songs written for some of them are classics and make up a huge part of their legacy).
You're making this shyt 100x more difficult than it needs to be.
Drake is a pop star
to me. I'm not a fan.
To Drake's fans, he was supposed to be the next Jay-Z.
Even though he's a pop star
to me, I can point out the ghost writing shyt because that's not the lane
his fans placed him in. If his fans considered him....I dunno, the male version of Taylor Swift.....then it's a nonissue.
Matter of fact, ignoring all that....his own camp said rappers with ghostwriters shouldn't even be in the game. Around 2012 or so. Then come to find out, he has ghostwriters. You could completely ignore random ass people on the internet chiming in on the topic....because his own camp said ghostwriters aren't ok.
Fred.