CurrencyChase
Banned
3.3% to 2.5% is not a big enough percentage difference to write an article about. Really Harvard?
3.3% to 2.5% is not a big enough percentage difference to write an article about. Really Harvard?What I dont understand is, why bytch about it? Work thru it like everything else in life. You aint about to change nature bruh.
You should cop some books on psychology and human nature cuz you're totally off.A woman wanting a man with money ain't got shyt to do with nature
If u wanna bring the nature argument up, all it takes to be a provider is making sure the family got food shelter and protection
Are women satisfied if a man is able to bring in just enough money to provide those things?
Where in nature does the female require the male to be able to provide her with anything beyond the bare necessities for survival?
Where in nature does the female look for the male that's able to obtain extravagant gifts for her?
Stop with this nature argument to excuse these gold diggers.
Not all women feel entitled. And I want to marry a woman with a strong educational background a good middle-class/upper-middle class background that also gave her solid exposure to reality, I simply cannot deal with out-of-touch women. I also plan on marrying a woman who shares at least shares similar professional aspirations as me, I don't plan on marrying someone who still works retail in their late-20s or who plans on being a stay-at-home mom.Lol naw, marrying a wife from a wealthy background should be every guys goal.
Women feel entitled period, might as well marry one who brings some thing to the table like wealth and connections for your children.
I'd have no problem divorcing a wealthy wife and receiving nothing. My only concern is that my children receive the benefits of having a two parents with connections or at least a mother who has family who are well connected.
You should cop some books on psychology and human nature cuz you're totally off.
Actually it is. "Keeping a man" can't be quantified.I'm not saying chicks should go out of their way to look for broke men
But to make that a primary motivation as to who they fall for is not honorable
Prior to women getting rights to work they had no choice but to look to men to be providers but now they proudly exclaim they don't need a man's money and have been screaming that shyt for decades now. Its no secret women only like the gender roles that favor them
It's not a coincidence that women of this era struggle with getting and or maintaining a man more than any other era of women in recorded history
Not all women feel entitled. And I want to marry a woman with a strong educational background a good middle-class/upper-middle class background that also gave her solid exposure to reality, I simply cannot deal with out-of-touch women. I also plan on marrying a woman who shares at least shares similar professional aspirations as me, I don't plan on marrying someone who still works retail in their late-20s or who plans on being a stay-at-home mom.
Actually it is. "Keeping a man" can't be quantified.
There was a time when women were considered property, there was a time when women could not break into most professional spheres or go to college, there was a time when women were not allowed to have credit cards (until 1974), and where their adulthood tended to depend on men.
"Keeping a man" means absolutely nothing at all.
The reason I don't plan on dating a broke women is the same reason women don't plan on dating a broke man: they're a liability, and they aren't useful for advancing my life.
I love creative women, but I don't have time for a starving artist.
That's not partnership and no that is not what I signed up for. I can do bad all by myself and I don't need you around running up the bills and eating the food. Life is easier/better without him.Yep went through this with an ex. Dude lost his job and then refused to help around the house. I would come home to a dirty house, no food and my dogs not walked or they had gone to the bathroom on themselves b/c they could no longer hold it (which he wouldn't clean up). So I was paying all the bills, cleaning the whole house by myself and on top of that the sex wasn't good.That's not partnership and no that is not what I signed up for. I can do bad all by myself and I don't need you around running up the bills and eating the food. Life is easier/better without him.
I swear ya'll men love to demonize women b/c we expect more out of a partner than dikk. shyt is so stupid.
This is something completely different to what I'm talking about
U were right to lose interest and or walk away from that situation
I at no point said a woman should take care of a man especially one who does absolutely nothing to contribute
I'm talking about specifically looking for a dude with an excessive amount of money and or giving up on/not giving a chance to a man who's at least trying but happens to be in hard times at the moment
??? Are you sure you're responding to the right post? None of what you are saying has anything to do with what I'm saying.So u wanna get married but have no clue to who?
U want to spend the rest of your life with someone but have not the slightest clue today who this person is, u just know somewhere out there there's someone you need to complete you?
Crazy how this desperate line of thinking is what people go out into the dating world with and wonder why most marriages don't last
. Keep playing and eventually I'll hit the jackpot. Long as I can contribute to my son's well-being then I'll sleep better. Motherfukkers don't check on me. The selfish, focused and heartless win at life.He was married with two kids...
His dream was detrimental to the commitment he made... He should have kept his dreams a hobby until it was profitable

But you have no idea under what circumstances those marriages were in to say that that was the case. Lack of money is stressful and shows you the true character of someone. You're being too black and white when relationships are very complex and multifaceted.
??? Are you sure you're responding to the right post? None of what you are saying has anything to do with what I'm saying.