This.
We've had six consecutive presidents who have been pro-corporate neolibs or neocons. Since 1980 America has orchestrated the largest transfer of wealth to the rich in world history, fully supported by the establishment on both sides. Obama, the most liberal president since Bernie entered the Senate,
started off his presidency by immediately bailing out all the rich a$$holes who put us in the mess in the first place and never meaningfully addressed anything they had done. Both Obama and both Clintons (the standard-bearers of the party for almost 30 years now) have no problem getting wealthy off of Wall Street and feeding everything back to the same establishment politics.
What is Sanders supposed to do as a pro-poor, anti-establishment senator in that climate? Magically be the 50 votes all by himself?
And I looked up you claim about CHIP, Sanders opposed the original CHIP because it had too many giveaways to corporate/Republican interests and he was fighting for a bill that covered MORE kids, not less. But once it was law he's continuously fought to make it better with more money and more people covered.
Bernie Sanders on Health Care