How did Jews become so financially powerful in the U.S?
- Thread starter Ronnie Lott
- Start date
Marvel
Psalm 149:5-9
I think its good that they are asking this question. Who is the major financier of the poisonous lifestyle and music that is being pushed to the black youth? Why are these people so focused on the destruction of the black community? Why the focus on the powerless and the oppressed that is at the bottom of society? Could it be that if those people were to rise and find out who they are really are, that it would be the end of those that run this current world.
I wonder if it's a coincidence that disciple of the projects and lion of Judah used to do the same thing
ltheghost
Payin Debts.... N40
I thought it was bank ownership and 0% interest loans. Investing heavily in themselves and understanding everyone hates them, so they banded together. Hitler tried to burn them in ovens they understood what they had to do to survive. Got their own land (Well that can be debated) and they have been helping themselves ever since.
Spartacus89
Rookie
I'm not really sure if Jews were shytted on when they arrived to the US. I mean, other ethnic groups like Italians, Greeks, Irish, etc were not considered whites at one point and suffered from anti-immigration sentiment from Anglo whites. There are also other ethnic groups that were barred entry into the nation or subject to quotas because they weren't seen as "white". But as far as I recall, the whiteness of Jews was never questioned. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I took a class about Arab American immigration and I remember from the class that Jews walked right into the country unquestioned but other Semites such as Arabs had to go to the court and prove to immigration officials that they were "white" to obtain citizenship. So Jews had always been treated better than other immigrant groups considered "white" on the census nowadays. It's really crazy though, when you study immigration and ethnicity in America how America pretty much invented the fictional unscientific "white" and "black" races then assigned people into the groups and reinforced them through unequal laws. But as far as I remember Jews didn't have to fight for whiteness as much as other "whites" and always been privileged even among other ethnicities within the "white race" in America.
Marvel
Psalm 149:5-9
So we agree that the fake Jews lack in talent overall as a people. Here is some wisdom:
This a prophecy concerning those with roots from Zion. That those descendants of Zion will be known as the best singers and musicians. Does that sound like the fake white Jews? What group of people does this sound like to you? Remember it shall be said, meaning future tense from when Psalms was originally written
Box Cutta
Bumbling Sidekick
-Jews historically had high literacy rates and were encouraged to engage in midrash.(Hence why I choose my username)
-Jewish rabbi were highly educated and were allowed to have wives and children. Christian priest weren't allowed to marry. This may seem insignificant but usually the best and the brightest were chosen to be the religious authority often in religious communities. Well what happens when the best and brightest can't reproduce? All of your smartest individuals die out leaving the less educated to reproduce.
-After the destruction of the temple in 70AD, there was a bit of a power struggle but it pretty much spread Jewish power. Jews had mandatory schooling and literacy which was a huge step at the time. The jews in power then mandated mandatory schooling which some of the farmers who weren't keen on wanting an education or were too poor to afford it either stayed and gritted their teeth or left to another religion. This was almost like a culling which left only smart, educated and financially stable jewish people as the poor jews and the ones who didn't want an education left to another religion.
-This intellectual power move made jews leave farming in mass. It incentivized them to go into other business ventures. Obviously things like banking, craftsmanship, etc was reinforced by high literacy rate. This really started the identity of the Jewish people as "The Choosen Few".
-Obviously the jews and banking situation with christans, everyone knows about that so I won't beat that dead horse.
-In the 20th century, Jewish migrants to the US were hungry to succeed and they wanted to be considered equal in a meritocratic society where there was still mass discrimination and antisemitism. Once field that they viewed this could happen was the field of science. Science itself is non-preferential in terms of race since it was simply a method of how we study the world. Jews weren't inherently smarter at science but they came to the field of science IN DROVES with a passion to gain their equality through scientific discovery, This allowed them to dominate the field of science like black people do with the NBA. All of a sudden, you had your Albert Einsteins and their ilk popping up left and right snagging Nobel Prizes like it was child's play.
-Obviously jewish people are very well connected to their community and didn't fall for none of that "strong independent single mom" bullshyt. They created strong family units and used it to their advantage to generate power through friction.
Jews aren't genetically smarter and black people can be just as good if not better but we have to study their moves and start taking a few notes. All this gang shyt and c00ning is destroying our sense of community and making us weak against systematic white supremacy.
This post was perfect.
End the thread.
We need to be copying aspects of their culture. Never surrender. Never concede. Fight for YOUR PEOPLE and DOMINATE!
Sadly, I don't think it's in the cards for blacks.
Black Americans.
360crazy
360crazy please say the crazy!
U r full of shyt.
So we agree that the fake Jews lack in talent overall as a people. Here is some wisdom:
This a prophecy concerning those with roots from Zion. That those descendants of Zion will be known as the best singers and musicians. Does that sound like the fake white Jews? What group of people does this sound like to you? Remember it shall be said, meaning future tense from when Psalms was originally written
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/marv...e-answers-to-posts-youve-been-ducking.220279/
Still waiting for you to address that thread @Marvel
Edit:
Czar said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= R5uESQL3Kv8
Part 2 (join to watch)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= W-5_QxPCmF4
^Part 3 (join to watch)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= hg-1V6qVFUU
^Part 4 (join to watch)
Czar said:Esau wasn't white.
From Josephus himself, a 1st century Jew historian.
http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/ant-1.htm
Last edited:
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
I see why you have -310 rep.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonenti...l-calls-those-who-disagree-nazi-sympathizers/
5/16/2013 @ 4:26PM 25,497 views
Israeli Researcher Challenges Jewish DNA links to Israel, Calls Those Who Disagree 'Nazi Sympathizers'
Comment Now
Follow Comments
The Genetic Literacy Project reports that the ongoing conflict between Israel and its neighbors over the origins of the “Jewish people” has surfaced again as an issue of great controversy—with science in the crosshairs.
It’s particularly troublesome when a scientist—in this case, an Israeli molecular geneticist whose motivations appear more personal and ideological than scientific—stokes the contretemps. The current brouhaha arises over a recent study by Eran Elhaik and is accompanied by his personal attacks on more mainstream scientists who have eviscerated his work. In the face of overwhelming evidence from dozens of studies over twenty years from geneticists and historians around the world, Elhaik is aggressively stumping on behalf of his belief that most Jews trace their seminal ancestry not to the Middle East but to the Caucuses and Eastern Europe.
Elhaik, who is now a post-doctoral researcher at Johns Hopkins, is recirculating the debunked “Khazarian hypothesis” promoted by journalist Arthur Koestler in his 1976 book, The Thirteenth Tribe, written before scientists had the tools to compare genomes and challenge his conclusion.
Khazarian myth
The Khazarian theory–which historians and scientists now believe should more accurately be called a myth—was more recently recycled (to great applause by anti-Israeli activists and some pro-Palestinian groups) in no less convincing form by Israeli French historian Shlomo Sand in The Invention of the Jewish People, published in 2008—a book panned by both historians and geneticists.
Elhaik reengaged the controversy late last year when the Oxford journal Genome Biology and Evolution published his study, “The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses.” The young Jewish researcher challenged the so-called “Rhineland hypothesis”—the broadly accepted genetic and historic evidence that about 80 percent of Jewish Ashkenazi males trace their ancestry to a core population of approximately 20,000 Eastern European Jews who originated in the Middle East. Elhaik wrote that the Khazars converted to Judaism in the eighth century, although historians believe and genetic evidence confirms that only a fraction of the population converted, including almost certainly royalty and some members of the aristocracy.
A paper published in 2000 by geneticists Harry Ostrer, a professor of genetics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and University of Arizona geneticist Michael Hammer showedthat most Ashkenazis,
Italians, North Africans, Iraqi, Iranian, Kurdish and Yemenite Jews share common Y-DNA haplotypes that are also found among many Arabs from Palestine, Lebanon and Syria. Only a small percentage of the Y-DNA of Jews originated outside of the Middle East—some in the Caucuses.
The competing Rhineland and Khazarian theories were most recently discussed by Ostrer in two studies published in 2012 and in his well received book, Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People. He found that geographically and culturally distant Jews still have more genes in common than they do with non-Jews around them, and that those genes can be traced back to the Levant, an area including modern-day Israel. “All European [Ashkenazi] Jews seem connected on the order of fourth or fifth cousins, Ostrer has said.
The concept of the “Jewish people” remains controversial. The Law of Return, the Israeli law that established the right of Jews around the world to settle in Israel and which remains in force today, was a central tenet of Zionism. The DNA that links Ashkenazi, Sephardi and Mizrahi, three prominent culturally and geographically distinct Jewish groups, could conceivably be used to support Zionist territorial claims —except, as Ostrer has pointed out, some of the same markers can be found in Palestinians, distant genetic cousins of the Jews, as well. Palestinians, understandably, want their own ‘right of return’.
That disagreement over the interpretations of Middle Eastern DNA also pits Jewish traditionalists against a particular strain of secular Jewish ultra-liberals who have joined with anti-Israeli Arabs and many non-Jews to argue for an end to Israel as a Jewish nation. Their hero is the Austrian-born Shlomo Sand—and now Elhaik. His study gained buzz in neo-Nazi websites and radical anti-Israeli and more radical pro-Palestinian blogs. For example, the notorious former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke actually attacked Elhaik in his latest anti-Jewish rant—Duke’s anti-Semitic beliefs hang on the fact that Jews are genetically cohesive and conspiratorial. “The disruptive and conflict-ridden behavior which has marked out Jewish Supremacist activities through the millennia strongly suggests that Jews have remained more or less genetically uniform and have … developed a group evolutionary survival strategy based on a common biological unity — something which strongly militates against the Khazar theory,” Duke wrote in his blog in February.
While Elhaik’s work has provided ideological support for those seeking the destruction of Israel, it’s fallen flat among established scientists, who peer reviewed his work and found it sloppy at best and political at worst.
“He’s just wrong,” said Marcus Feldman of Stanford University, a leading researcher in Jewish genetics. “If you take all of the careful genetic population analysis that has been done over the last 15 years… there’s no doubt about the common Middle Eastern origin,” he said. He added that Elhaik’s paper “is sort of a one-off.”
“It’s an unrealistic premise,” said University of Arizona geneticist Michael Hammer, one of the world’s top Y-chromosomal researchers.
Discover’s Razib Khan did a textured critique in his Gene Expression blog, noting the study’s historical fuzziness and its selective use of data to come up with what seems like a pre-cooked conclusion. As Razib writes, it’s hardly surprising that we would find a small but sizable Khazarian contribution to the “Jewish gene pool”. In fact the male line of my own family traces to the Caucuses, suggesting I’m one of the 20 percent or so of Jews whose lineage traces to converted royal Khazarians. But that view is widely acknowledged by Ostrer, Hammer, Feldman, Michael Thomas and every major researcher in this area—as summarized in my book, Abraham’s Children: Race, Identity and the DNA of the Chosen People.
The rebuke of Elhaik’s study apparently has irked the beleaguered and brash researcher. He’s launched a new offensive—the double entendre is intentional—as chronicled in the Jewish Forward. Elhaik is now calling the world’s top geneticists “liars” and “frauds.” When I weighed in on the magazine’s discussion board, Elhaik responded with academic restraint, claiming my reporting was no better than the geneticists he trashed, saying it shared “common ground with the Nazism (sic) ideology.”
Judaism’s tribal roots
Unlike Christianity and Islam, Judaism is not solely a faith-based religion. Its origins, as is the case with the other prominent surviving ancient religion, Zoroastrianism, are tribal. The blood connections mentioned endlessly in the Hebrew Bible are not just symbolic; the Jews of ancient Israel were a clan of connected tribes who coalesced over hundreds of years. While Jesus and later Mohammad transformed the notion of “blood” into “faith”—one could become a Christian or Muslim through faith alone—Judaism has always retained an ancestral component.
In the Torah, that blood link is patrilineal, passed on from father to son. That tradition is preserved today in the Jewish priesthood, known as the Aaronite line. According to the Bible(and we have no way to know if this is historical or apocryphal), Aaron was anointed as the first Jewish priest and his sons and their descendants became the seed population of the Jewish priesthood. Jewish Cohanim—the word means ‘priests’ in Hebrew—supervised the inner sanctum until the destruction of the Second Temple in the first century, after which the Aaronite line was preserved by tradition, with Cohanim having special privileges and responsibilities to this day.
Are present day Cohanim descended from Aaron? That question is unanswerable; we do not even know for certain that Aaron or Moses even existed. However, DNA studies of the Y chromosome have determined that a majority of self-proclaimed Cohanim (it’s an oral tradition) has a set of genetic markers that trace back approximately three thousand years to a single common ancestor. In other words, if there was no Aaron, there was certainly a High Priest early in the Jewish tradition whose ancestors have retained evidence of that tradition in their DNA.
As discussed in Abraham’s Children, Judaism has always retained its tribal roots even as faith-based religions flourished. In the centuries after the destruction of the Second Temple in the first century, Jewish lineage became defined through the mother rather than the father. Jewishness is now based on a triple helix: belief in God (although many Jews are agnostic or atheist); recognition of ancient Israel as a Biblical homeland; and literal blood connection with other Jews, passed on from generation to generation.
To many people—including and especially Jews sensitive to the Nazi branding of Jews as a race, which led to the near extinction of the religion—acknowledging the genetic cohesiveness of Judaism is uncomfortable. Anything that marks Jews as essentially different runs the risk of stirring either anti- or philo-Semitism. But that doesn’t mean we can ignore the factual reality of what Ostrer calls the “biological basis of Jewishness” and “Jewish genetics.” Acknowledging the genetic distinctiveness of Jews is “fraught with peril,” but we must grapple with the hard evidence of “human differences” if we seek to understand their implications of the age of genetics.
Spartacus89
Rookie
What you said is not true though, Islam and Christianity also enhanced the family structure, education, and literacy of societies/peoples/tribes/clans who embraced or came into contact with those religions. Muslims and Christians are just as smart, controlled Kingdoms much larger than Israel EVER WAS. Hell, you can argued that they contributed more to science than the Jews. So why aren't these people running the banks and all these NBA teams? It has more to do with ethnic exclusion than religion. They (Jews) kept people out of their culture whereas the other 2 religions accepted various ethnicities.