"I believe Goodell railroaded Tom Brady" UPDATE: Transcripts Released - NFL, RAVENS & COLTS EXPOSED

[Steezy]

Already made an offer. I sit out for as many weeks as brady misses games. If he gets games reduced or cleared then you miss the same amount of weeks

we can't lose you for NFL fukkkery breh

 

[BucciMane]

This is not like Bonds at all bruh...For starters they were trying to get Bonds on purjery charges...Brady isnt being tried for purjery, Goodells ruling is centered around Brady's failure to cooperate which is easily proven...he had his phone destroyed after he was asked to produce documents from it...

All the government had on Bonds is that he purchased "cream" from Conte/Balco for rehabilitation...Its hard to prove Bonds was lying when dude is telling you a physician recommended it and that he trusted that physicians judgement...Trusting that physician doesn't equal guilty of knowingly taking steroids...that just proves Bonds was naive...

In Brady's case we have texts from the ball boys specifically mentioning deflating the balls and Brady...Add that along with the fact Brady destroyed his phone after the investigator asked for specific texts (documents) and you have more than enough to prove "more probable than not" which is what the NFL is claiming...

You can't possibly be this dumb. The ONLY mentions of psi in the text messages were about them being in LEGAL range. Brady asked for the officials to look at the rulebook for the legal limits. People like you are the blind, mentally challenged people Goodell loves.

Cliffs:

You haven't read anything, or you can't read.

 

[Shogun]

Pats fans putting in 40 hour weeks on this shyt
Eh well, looking forward to the next opportunity to hate on the fagget ass patriots

 

[The Fukin Prophecy]

"Not cooperating" isn't going to hold up in court. They are saying Brady was aware of the situation. He says he isn't. It's exactly the same as the bonds situation. You can't prove it.

What he DID trumps what he says...

Once again...

BRADY HAD HIS PHONE DESTROYED AFTER BEING ASKED TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THE INVESTIGATION

How the fukk does that not prove failure to cooperate? How is that FACT not going to hold in court? The transcripts sure as hell do not help Brady and the burden of proof is on him since he's the one appealing Goodells ruling...

The burden of proof wasnt on Bonds...Bonds wasn't appealing a suspension...Stop comparing apples to oranges...

 

[Rekkapryde]

imo this is similar to the case they tried to jam up barry bonds ass in regards to him knowing he was using steroids or not. the convo between the pats equipment guys/brady destroying his phone coincidentally right before he talked to the investigators etc clearly indicates there is smoke there. the problem will be proving he was aware, when they have nothing linking him. bonds roided, but they couldnt prove bonds knowingly did, because once he says he didnt know and theres no evidence proving otherwise that shyt is cut and dry. brady certainly was in tandem with the equipment guys about how he wanted the footballs, but once he says he wasnt aware and they dont have a link, theres zero case left. the draft pick penalties stay, but bradys 4 game suspension isnt going to be upheld

Yall keep forgetting this is not a case of simply breaking the law regarding off the field shenanigans. It's an on field "integrity of the game" issue. Goodell doesn't need concrete conclusive evidence to nail Tom in this case and has full autonomy to rule in those matters. It's why the NFLPA is trying to sue regarding "the process" and not the suspension itself.

 

[cook]

we can't lose you for NFL fukkkery breh

These p*ssys haven't taken me up on my offer :safuture:

 

[The Fukin Prophecy]

These p*ssys haven't taken me up on my offer :safuture:

Because your offer is retarded...

We been through this already...Why would anyone accept an offer where they still lose if they're right?

My offer still stands for all of you pussies...The judge throws out Goodells ruling 4 game (week) ban for me...The judge upholds Goodles ruling 4 game (week) ban for yall...None of this what if settlement half guilty bullshyt...

Man up...

 

[Rekkapryde]

Because your offer is retarded...

We been through this already...Why would anyone accept an offer where they still lose if they're right?

My offer still stands for all of you pussies...The judge throws out Goodells ruling 4 game (week) ban for me...The judge upholds Goodles ruling 4 game (week) ban for yall...None of this what if settlement bullshyt...

Man up...

@cook

 

[cook]

Because your offer is retarded...

We been through this already...Why would anyone accept an offer where they still lose if they're right?

My offer still stands for all of you pussies...The judge throws out Goodells ruling 4 game (week) ban for me...The judge upholds Goodles ruling 4 game (week) ban for yall...None of this what if settlement bullshyt...

Man up...

Na we established you were scared of the deal. Thanks for the input though.

 

[Stress Welker]

Because your offer is retarded...

We been through this already...Why would anyone accept an offer where they still lose if they're right?

My offer still stands for all of you pussies...The judge throws out Goodells ruling 4 game (week) ban for me...The judge upholds Goodles ruling 4 game (week) ban for yall...None of this what if settlement bullshyt...

Man up...

How is this fair?

You get 4 game upheld and everything between.

Other person gets 4 game suspension overturned.

Odds are in your favor. Of course you're flexin' and acting all badass.

 

[resurrection]

LMAO Ma$$holes ain't even gonna touch this one.. "Possibly; I don't know. Was it?" Been saying all along Br*dy thinks everyone else is too stupid to see beneath his smiling veneer

REISNER: And you say you don't recall precisely when you gave this phone to your assistant for destruction, correct?

BRADY: Yes.

REISNER: But if you were following your practice, you would have done it around the time that you got a new phone, correct?

BRADY: I'm not sure.

REISNER: Well, the letter that you just said accurately describes your practice says you destroy SIM cards when you get a new phone and "to destroy the actual device when he is done with the phone," right?

BRADY: My assistant does that.

REISNER: Right. So if your actual practice was being followed, the phone would have been destroyed, the phone you were using would have been destroyed around the same time you started using another phone, correct?

BRADY: Right.

REISNER: And directing your attention back to the Declaration of Mr. Maryman, NFLPA Exhibit 6.

BRADY: Yeah.

REISNER The date of active use of your new phone, according to paragraph 4 of his declaration, was March 6, 2015, correct?

BRADY: Yes.

REISNER Do you remember anything else that happened on March 6, 2015?

BRADY: No.

REISNER: Was March 6, 2015 the date that you were interviewed by Mr. Wells and his team?

BRADY: Possibly; I don't know. Was it?

REISNER: If I represent to you that March 6, 2015 was the date you were interviewed by Mr. Wells and his team, you have no reason to doubt that, correct?

BRADY: Right, correct.

REISNER: And because your forensic expert didn't have access to the phone that was being used during what I'm calling this gap period, he couldn't review the text messages, the content of the text messages that were sent and received during this gap period, correct?

BRADY: I think we tried to provide him with everything that we possibly could, you know, to that point. If the phone was already taken out of service, then it was --

REISNER: You couldn't provide him with a phone that had been destroyed, correct?

BRADY: Or that I had given to my assistant, whether he destroyed it or not.

REISNER: That you gave to your assistant for the purposes of destruction, correct?

BRADY: Possibly.

REISNER: Was that your purpose? Was that your planwhen you provided the discarded phone to yourassistant, that your assistant would destroy thephone?

BRADY: That was kind of the normal routine.

BRADY: Possibly.

REISNER: So that was your expectation when you provided that phone to your assistant that the phone would be, in fact, destroyed, correct?

BRADY: Yes.

REISNER: And if you were following your ordinary practice, that would have been around the beginning of the date of active use of the new phone that you were using, correct?
REISNER: If you were following the practice described in Mr. Yee's letter, that's what would have occurred, correct?

BRADY: Not sure.

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

@ "Ma$$holes"

 

[cook]

How is this fair?

You get 4 game upheld and everything between.

Other person gets 4 game suspension overturned.

Odds are in your favor. Of course you're flexin' and acting all badass.

as it stands right now im signing myself up for an automatic 4 week ban and they still won't enter the bet :ohthatsintradesting:

 

[Joe Sixpack]

Brady not gonna miss any games

 

[cook]

LMAO Ma$$holes ain't even gonna touch this one.. "Possibly; I don't know. Was it?" Been saying all along Br*dy thinks everyone else is too stupid to see beneath his smiling veneer

wells didnt ask for him to turn over the phone nor did he say there would be a problem if he didnt turn it over