Yes, but we don't know that Jane Sanders knowingly did anything. The signs of a miscommunication are clear as day in the OP,
VTDigger also interviewed the largest
confirmed donor listed in the loan application. Corinne Bove Maietta, a member of the renowned Burlington Bove’s Restaurant family, disputed the manner in which her pledge was represented by Sanders in the loan agreement.
Maietta said she agreed to give the college an unspecified amount upon her death as a bequest. Documents show, however, Sanders stated in a loan application that Maietta would contribute a series of cash payments totaling $1 million. The payments were to be completed over a period of time, according to records obtained by VTDigger.
Maietta said she also never signed a formal pledge agreement with the college. A former vice president at the college disputes that claim.
Clearly there's confusion here, but of nefarious nature? Nah, that's not proven at all.
Using his wife’s (alleged) corruption to obtain congressional recognition and favorable terms for future business for his political donors and allies
Yet your only tangential attempt at evidence is a twitter user pointing out Bernie giving one Congressional tribute and saying "why not Ben and Jerry also?".
So now the problem is you’re not getting daily updates?
Still trying to twist my point on this one? You treat news that's been public for four months as though it proves Jane's guilt and implicates Bernie when it doesn't. If the news was as devastating as you've tried incessantly to claim, then that would be national news. The problem is, the news you've posted doesn't prove a damn thing or provide evidence of guilt. It just shows that the accusations are being investigated.
Your sorry ass didn’t learn about this until 48 hours ago.
No you clown, I'm a Bernie supporter, we've known the accusations and we know that there hasn't been a conclusion yet. My problem is stated plainly in the second post I made in this thread,
I feel you, I def coulda been a more clear on the comparison. What I'm getting at is that regardless of the end result of the investigation, it will be brought back up in future elections (and it looks like only Hillary supporters care about it, so my money's on Neolibs using it in the primaries).
You already, having made up your mind, make a perfect case study for the type of fools who are can be picked off with the same strategies that helped Trump beat Hillary. You're literally proving my point throughout this thread.
It's literally where I set the goal posts in the first place.
Back off the Bernie investigation. It would be a real shame if something should happen to the fingers you use to repost tweets.
