I know we love penny hardaway but........

NoMoreWhiteWoman2020

RIP Kobe, the best
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
23,121
Reputation
12,299
Daps
84,929
Reppin
CTE
I'm negging OP and any idiot who shyts on Penny. fukkers must be millennials or some shyt next y'all gonna say Hakeem Olajuwon was a good role player or some shyt :russ:
 

Consumed

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
5,990
Reputation
1,410
Daps
16,122

Only rarely mentioned if this board is the only place you discuss basketball at. Hill is THE most popular what if story despite being 27 years old with 6 years of experience at the time he got injured. We likely already saw his prime, and it wasn't "LeBron before LeBron" that so many hyperbolize.

It's also not overrating a player to mention them a lot. It would be overrating to call Penny something he wasn't, and besides that one guy who said he was better than LeBron (everyone disagred) the opinions were on the money for the most part.
 
Last edited:

revan

All Star
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
3,057
Reputation
285
Daps
7,573
Reppin
New Orleans
Since when is 21 points and 7 assists bad? He was a dynamic player, he could very well have blossomed into a 25/10 guy. I've never seen anyone say he was Jordan caliber tbh.
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,230
Daps
17,747
He was better

G.Hill was putting up LBJ numbers before the injury

Grant Hill was better, and had more potential. Grant Hill's feet and ankles robbed us of a truly great player.

26/7/5 on nearly 50% shooting before his body failed.

That being said, this era saw a couple of stars stolen from them, plus a super duo (that hill/tmac team should have been incredibly fun to watch)
 

nieman

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
18,085
Reputation
2,746
Daps
36,026
Reppin
Philly
I said this in a few other Penny threads, but as nice as he was, I think he had already peaked. Remember, they moved him to the 2, and when they did that, eliminated a lot of what made him effective. But I will say that Penny is probably the best face-up handler I've ever seen. He rarely turned his back to the basket. But still, as an elite PG, averaging 7apg...he was a tad overrated.

But y'all can't really shyt on Grant Hill. Grant hill had 32 or so triple doubles in the first 6 years. He and Kidd were neck-n-neck.
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,353
Daps
118,860
Grant Hill was better, and had more potential. Grant Hill's feet and ankles robbed us of a truly great player.

26/7/5 on nearly 50% shooting before his body failed.

That being said, this era saw a couple of stars stolen from them, plus a super duo (that hill/tmac team should have been incredibly fun to watch)
No doubt he was still making all star games off rep alone although he was barely playing any games.
 

Diyhai

En Causa Sui
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
14,179
Reputation
763
Daps
20,141
Reppin
Baltimore
He is basically Derrick Rose
Had spark when he started.......:wow:
If healthy where would Rose have ranked?
 

The_Third_Man

Superstar
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
6,918
Reputation
521
Daps
12,779
Reppin
NULL
Only rarely mentioned if this board is the only place you discuss basketball at. Hill is THE most popular what if story despite being 27 years old with 6 years of experience at the time he got injured. We likely already saw his prime, and it wasn't "LeBron before LeBron" that so many hyperbolize.

It's also not overrating a player to mention them a lot. It would be overrating to call Penny something he wasn't, and besides that one guy who said he was better than LeBron (everyone disagred) the opinions were on the money for the most part.
:francis:
Yeah Penny is overrated here. He used to be 7-11 year olds' favorite player (the lil Penny campaign was huge) back then which is probably the age bracket of the majority of coli posters around 95-97.

on the other hand Grant Hill is underrated

HERE = THE COLI

See I don't care whether certain player "reached his prime or not" before he got injured. I only care about what he actually did on the court. It's hard to predict how good a player can get because every player career trajoctory is different. Some players are late bloomers, others are early bloomers, some stay basically the same the rest of their careers...etc so nobody knows "what would've happened if..."

I don't know about you, but I don't think calling a very athletic 6'8 small forward who could attack the basket, handle, pass, rebound and defend "lebron before lebron" is too far fetched.

maybe you found their opinions on Penny right on the money because you like him so much that have a picture of him in your avatar?

With that being said, imo Penny was very good all-star level player in his first 3 years, but not a superstar like some coli posters claim.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,615
Daps
90,342
Reppin
NO
90's players always get overrated . Who exactly is putting him up there with Mike & them tho:francis:
My nikka thats baloney. 90's squad had waaaay more personality and better game then these Millennial players :francis:
 

Consumed

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
5,990
Reputation
1,410
Daps
16,122
:francis:


HERE = THE COLI

See I don't care whether certain player "reached his prime or not" before he got injured. I only care about what he actually did on the court. It's hard to predict how good a player can get because every player career trajoctory is different. Some players are late bloomers, others are early bloomers, some stay basically the same the rest of their careers...etc so nobody knows "what would've happened if..."

I don't know about you, but I don't think calling a very athletic 6'8 small forward who could attack the basket, handle, pass, rebound and defend "lebron before lebron" is too far fetched.

maybe you found their opinions on Penny right on the money because you like him so much that have a picture of him in your avatar?

With that being said, imo Penny was very good all-star level player in his first 3 years, but not a superstar like some coli posters claim.

Penny was a superstar on the court.....See this is the problem, you think he's overrated because you don't understand how good he actually was. 1996 Penny Hardaway is one of the best PG's you will ever see in your life. MVP Derrick Rose? Not better than Penny that season.

Penny actually was in his prime already. We just don't know how much better he'd have gotten, but what he did in that span is impressive enough.

Grant Hill was NEVER the dominant scorer that LeBron was. That is what makes LeBron a GOAT level player and separates him from the likes of Scottie Pippen who's nowhere in that discussion. You can't be "LeBron before LeBron" when you were never a dominant scorer and had a spotty postseason resume at best.

I have Penny in my avatar because I appreciate his game. You clearly don't understand it
 
Top