I played in both eras, I played against both of them. Jordan is the #GOAT - Ray Allen

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,541
Reputation
9,926
Daps
238,690
Since someone doesn't want to answer this question, I'll put it out to the rest of y'all Jeffrey's Witnesses -
What do you think Jordan could average in the league today, and what do you think Durant could average during the late 80s/early 90s?

This should be interesting.

:mjgrin:
magic-johnson-eating-popcorn.gif
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,147
Reputation
13,245
Daps
397,948
Reppin
CHICAGO
What do you think Jordan could average in the league today, and what do you think Durant could average during the late 80s/early 90s?

This should be interesting.

:mjgrin:


IVE NEVER SEEN KD KNOCKED ON HIS ASS.

HES NOT A DYNAMIC FINISHER
THAT CAN AVOID MULTIPLE DEFENDERS.

THE PHYSICALITY WOULD LIMIT HIS INSIDE GAME
AND FREE THROWS.
HAND CHECKING WOULD
LIMIT HIS HANDLE.

ILL GIVE HIM 27 PPG

MJ GOING FOR ATLEAST 40 IN 2DAYS LEAGUE.

THE SKILLESS WESTBROOK DID 32
OFF MOTOR AND ATHLETICISM ALONE.

yea aight nikka that said jordan is the goat shooter, im sure your opinion got some unbiasedness to it


NOW WE LYING fakkit?

QUOTE ME WHERE I SAID MJ
WAS THE GOAT SHOOTER.

:devil:
:evil:

 

Rigby.

The #1 Rated Mixtape of all Time
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
51,190
Reputation
2,032
Daps
73,358
Reppin
JordanHareStadium

IVE NEVER SEEN KD KNOCKED ON HIS ASS.

HES NOT A DYNAMIC FINISHER
THAT CAN AVOID MULTIPLE DEFENDERS.

THE PHYSICALITY WOULD LIMIT HIS INSIDE GAME
AND FREE THROWS.

ILL GIVE HIM 28 PPG




NOW WE LYING fakkit?

QUOTE ME WHERE I SAID MJ
WAS THE GOAT SHOOTER.

:devil:
:evil:

ONLY CLOWNS THINK A GOAT SHOOTER LIKE MJ
WOULDNT THRIVE IN THIS ERA.

NOW SHOW ME WHERE THE BEST SHOOTERS 2DAY
HAD A SEASON LIKE THAT.

Your argument was that Jordan was not only a GOAT shooter, not only produced a season that you deemed better than the best shooters of today's time (an era that's produced two guys that are heralded as the best shooters), but you relied on false equivalencies and individual seasons/three playoff stretches to determine he'd be elite in an era where there's actually dozens of guys hitting in the constraints your "GOAT shooter" was performing at during his best seasons.

2017-18 Regular Season NBA Player Stats and League Leaders - Scoring Per Game - National Basketball Association - ESPN
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
61,147
Reputation
13,245
Daps
397,948
Reppin
CHICAGO
Your argument was that Jordan was not only a GOAT shooter, not only produced a season that you deemed better than the best shooters of today's time (an era that's produced two guys that are heralded as the best shooters), but you relied on false equivalencies and individual seasons/three playoff stretches to determine he'd be elite in an era where there's actually dozens of guys hitting in the constraints your "GOAT shooter" was performing at during his best seasons.

2017-18 Regular Season NBA Player Stats and League Leaders - Scoring Per Game - National Basketball Association - ESPN

ONCE AGAIN
SHOW ME WHERE I SAID HE WAS THE GOAT SHOOTER...

SECONDLY
THAT SEASON I POSTED WAS ABOUT HIS OVERALL GAME
WHICH IS WHY IT INCLUDED
REBOUNDS, ASSISTS AND STEALS.

A DIRECT RESPONSE TO YOUR VIRGIN ASS
SAYING MJ SUFFERED IN OTHER ASPECTS OF THE GAME
WHEN HE SHOT THREES.

SO AGAIN
SHOW ME A GOAT SHOOTER 2DAY
PUTTING UP
34, 7, 6 & 3
ON 54% FG & 38% 3P

YOURE THE EPITOME OF A bytch ASS nikka.
:devil:
:evil:

 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,541
Reputation
9,926
Daps
238,690

IVE NEVER SEEN KD KNOCKED ON HIS ASS.

HES NOT A DYNAMIC FINISHER
THAT CAN AVOID MULTIPLE DEFENDERS.

:usure:



Nevermind mind the fact, he doesn't need to be a dynamic finisher / avoid multiple defenders to finish in the paint - he's 7ft! He's not a guard, he doesn't need to avoid/finesse his way around interior defenders when he can just finish over them.


THE PHYSICALITY WOULD LIMIT HIS INSIDE GAME
AND FREE THROWS.



You mean the same physicality that limited Adrian Dantley to 8-10 FTs a game? And yet you think a more athletic, more skilled, much, much bigger wing's inside game would suffer?

:mjgrin:
HAND CHECKING WOULD
LIMIT HIS HANDLE.



Remind me, what wing players in the late 80s/90s had a comparable handle (nevermind the fact that he would be standing eye-to-eye with 4s/5s)? How could less skilled, less athletic, smaller players survive with all this hand-checking, and still consistently average 20+ points, even closing in on 30 ppg?

Re hand-checking:

1978/79 -

"Clarification added to prohibit hand-checking through “rigid enforcement” of rule allowing a defensive player to retain contact with his opponent so long as he does not impede his opponent’s progress."

Proper hand-checking was basically outlawed by 1980. You could no longer use your hand to impede a player's progress. Basically, real hand-checking wasn't in existence by the time Jordan came into the league. The amount of contact you see on ball-handlers today (especially the playoffs) is basically the same as it was when Jordan was in the league. This isn't even mentioning that from about Jordan's third season he was getting "superstar" calls. Not only was he not dealing with real hand-checking but he was getting calls that the regular player wasn't getting. I've got a ton of tape back in my parents' crib where dudes like Snapper Jones said regularly through the early/mid '80s that defenses weren't what they used to be in the 70s when you could hand-check.


Even with your constant, misplaced emphasis on the effects of hand-checking, Durant would still get superstar calls -- as above, if someone like Dantley lived at the line, there's no reason to think Durant would'nt also. Not to mention, since Durant is one if, if not the greatest pull-up 3-pt shooter of all-time, and he played during a period where they didn't defend the 3-pt shot like they do today, you don't think Durant would be even more efficient from behind the arc? You don't think Durant wouldn't dominate during a period where the majority of his possessions would be weakside 1v1s (where he would have an advantage against every single type of defender)?

ILL GIVE HIM 27 PPG

:devil:
:evil:

giphy.gif


You're telling me the greatest shooting, most skilled 7fter to ever set foot on the court (who moves like a guard in the most athletic period in history) would only max out on the same level as:

'88/'89 Dale Ellis - 27 ppg
'86/'87 Mark Aguire - 26 ppg
'86/'87 Alex English - 28 ppg (he then went on to average 26 ppg at age 35 during the '88/'89 season)
'88'/'89 Chris Mullen - 26 ppg
'89/'90 Tom Chambers - 27 ppg
'90/'91 Bernard King at age 34 - 28 ppg
'85/'86** Adrian Dantley - 30 ppg

Gon'head and marinate on that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,541
Reputation
9,926
Daps
238,690


SO AGAIN
SHOW ME A GOAT SHOOTER 2DAY
PUTTING UP
34, 7, 6 & 3
ON 54% FG & 38% 3P
:devil:
:evil:

It doesn't work like that.

Like @Rigby. said, you're working on false equivalences - Jordan only attempted three 3-pt shots a game during that season, this is of course during a period where the 3-pt shot was barely defended (where someone like Durant attempts TWICE as many and hits them at 42%). Which is why FG% isn't a great measurement to use when comparing players who don't shoot a similar amount of 3s. eFG%, while not perfect, is a better measurement if you're looking for efficiency on total field goals.

Durant's MVP season where he averaged 32 ppg on 56-eFG% is on par with Jordan's 33.6 ppg on 55-eFG% season.

Curry's MVP season where he averaged 30 ppg on 63-eFG% is on another level though, and could've easily averaged another 2-3 points if he didn't sit out a large portion of 4th quarters.

:hubie:
 

steph_harden

Superstar
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
6,306
Reputation
645
Daps
20,165
Jordan ain’t scoring 45 ppg stop it...:russ:

If you want an idea of what Jordan would do in this league look at prime Kobe. They are basically the same fukking dude. Jordan’s production would be pretty similar. 45 a game is just over the top unrealistic.

Jordan is like the A version. Prime Kobe was at 45% and 35ppg....Mike would be 50% which why I think if he gunned for it he’d be at 40ppg. 45ppg is ridiculous though
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
88,541
Reputation
9,926
Daps
238,690
Jordan is like the A version. Prime Kobe was at 45% and 35ppg....Mike would be 50% which why I think if he gunned for it he’d be at 40ppg. 45ppg is ridiculous though
MJ's FG% most probably wouldn't be anywhere near 50, because naturally, he'd be shooting more 3-pointers (thus dropping his FG%, which as I mentioned earlier isn't the best measurement of efficiency), and against better defenses.
 

Supreme365

Superstar
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
5,864
Reputation
1,290
Daps
18,532
Reppin
DC
KD would struggle more in the 80s or 90s because he would get hand checked and nikkas would do whatever it takes to mess up his timing take the ball out of his hands

you ain't gonna block KD's shot, but you can annoy him



KD would still average 26-27 points in 80/90s but he won't be as efficient. after all rules and defense were tougher back then :manny:


So you pick a playoff series against a team that had a DPOY center and one of the best perimeter defenders of all time :mjlol: and at 25 KD still averaged 29 and 9

Kd would destroy anything moving in the 80’s and 90’s him and me would be trading scoring titles

Defense wasn’t tougher, D didn’t get really physical and slow until the mid 90’s you’ll always talk about isiah Thomas averaging 30 but seem to forget that 5’9 160 lbs Michael adams averaged 26
 
Top