I told y'all muh'fukkas that Pop's being left behind.....
- Thread starter Gil Scott-Heroin
- Start date
Still trying to force an agenda like usual.
No need to force anything - the results speak for themselves. I'm just laughing at you copping pleas when you once had a different energy in this thread.Still trying to force an agenda like usual.
staticshock
Veteran
And you don't watch hoops, you make that abundantly clear every time you embarrass yourself with each post.
AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA.I mean this Spurs team wasnt supposed to make the playoffs. Also, it ain't on Pop that Keldon and Dejounte both shyt the bed
You have some nerve. Lord have mercy.
how many wins is this roster supposed to give?AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA.
You have some nerve. Lord have mercy.
EDIT: 12 hours later no response. Ain’t u a notorious box score watcher anyway
Last edited:
staticshock
Veteran
ok mr. Box score watcher
nikka you walk around like you’re a scout and watch 12 hours of tape every day
Dwight Howard
Superstar
Not a single coach in the league is making the playoffs with these rosters. Think you know better than Greg poppovich.3 years in a row of no playoffs
They have what kind of point guard?
AlbertPullhoez
The Takeover
You read exactly what the fukk I said fakkit ass nikka
Now you see the levels of bozoness i deal with daily with the dodo @Regular_P
. Let me neg him for you real quick.I don't think it's about the wins, in a vacuum, but other coaches would probably give them more drive and a different outlook that could potentially unlock shyt that has previously been kept away. That doesn't just apply to the Spurs-Pop either, it goes for every team where they've reached the end of the road with their respective coach; Pop's been on the same franchise for two decades now, during a period that has changed more than any other in NBA history. It only makes sense someone of Pop's era doesn't quite have their finger on the pulse. We saw the same thing happened to Phil Jackson after he was left behind, shunning any analytical strategem and continuing to revive the Triangle after it was dead and gone. And wins =/= good coaching; there seems to be a common misconception that wins, themselves, means a coach is doing a good job, or conversely, losses means the coach is doing a bad job. Which is funny here because you've got smart dumb nxggas like @Don Homer who are excusing Pop for the Spurs' lack of wins, when he wouldn't do it for any other coach. When he's really none the wiser, because i) he doesn't watch Spurs games, ii) he doesn't understand coaching or how to measure it.
It's really the problem with this board: once you're deemed a good or bad coach, that's going to stick, and the same excuses afforded to Pop for not making the playoffs for three consecutive years would be used to ridicule another coach in the same position. Confirmation bias takes hold and folks just use whatever they can to fuel that, not really knowing if the coach is still who they think he was.
Last edited: