If she's not submissive, don't date her. Simple

[Giselle]

If a girl isn't submissive and isn't comfortable as the man taking the lead, I don't even look her way

I see all this back and forth on these threads about the relationship dynamic and modern women. It just makes no sense. nikkas in here puling their hair out on what happened to women

Simple, just get you a submissive woman
I can't count how many times I've talked to women who were proud about not knowing how to cook and clean, and dismissing them and deleting their numbers. It feels great . No sense in stressing about it


My last girlfriend was submissive, and I loved it
-Cooked and cleaned to perfection
-Always cooked a hot meal for me when I came back from work
-Held my opinions with weight, and listened to my advice
-Never denied me sex cause she wanted to "teach me a lesson" or "was mad at me"
-Did every type of sexual thing under the sun, freak in the sheets
-Never got an attitude with me
-Convos always flowed smoothly. Would give great advice, without a reprimanding/condescending tone


Every week I see a thread of "Oh my women won't do this", "Oh women these days are always saying this"

Just leave those feminists alone brehs. Don't attack them, don't try to apply logic to their lives. Leave them be. It would be like putting a square peg in a circular hole. It just won't work. If they want to be alone forever, that's on them

Any guy who deals with a feminist, have fun

LOL, but your last girl is alone even though she did all of those things.

You are alone as well, I bet. That's why you're speaking about your last girl and not your current.

 

[Gaara]

It would have probably made more sense if you said something like this the first time I can dig this.

i said the same thing the first time you just got caught in your feelings

 

[Mugenight]

i said the same thing the first time you just got caught in your feelings

I highly doubt it.

 

[Gaara]

I highly doubt it.

Whatever

 

[Mugenight]

Indeed.

 

[UpAndComing]

LOL, but your last girl is alone even though she did all of those things.

You are alone as well, I bet. That's why you're speaking about your last girl and not your current.

Sounds like you decided to post a reply without reading the thread

 

[stealthbomber]

Here's where a lot of y'all nikkas get fukked up in the game. You aint gotta tell a women to be submissive. You aint gotta even bring the subject up. You just have to be a man worth submitting to and women will naturally fall in line. The reality is most y'all nikkas really aint bout shyt and the women you fukk with treat you accordingly.

Why would a women follow you when most y'all nikkas can't even lead yourselves out of debt?

don't even have words for this. just.. powerful powerful posting

that last line though

 

[Drip Bayless]

Exactly. So why the comparison of your submissive girl/wife to your mother doing laundry for you as a college student?

Because y'all nikkas want girls who will treat you like children and give you whatever you want when you want. Guy here said your girl should give you sex whenever you desire it. But do you. If a woman is contributing to the household financially then it's not my place to order her around. If you're making her a housewife then I guess you can make her your concubine or whatever yall want. Personally I want an equal who stimulates me not a dog who follows me

 

[Gaara]

Because y'all nikkas want girls who will treat you like children and give you whatever you want when you want. Guy here said your girl should give you sex whenever you desire it. But do you. If a woman is contributing to the household financially then it's not my place to order her around. If you're making her a housewife then I guess you can make her your concubine or whatever yall want. Personally I want an equal who stimulates me not a dog who follows me

Finally somebody with some common sense

 

[Drip Bayless]

Finally somebody with some common sense

A lot of these psychotic feminazis have really distorted what being a feminist means. I love how the OP starts off with assuming women are either submissive pawns, or feminist psychos. And these the same dudes repping #GMB heavy when they get cheated on cause they girl met somebody who acknowledges that they're a human being, not a lemming. Stuck in the 50s. Like I said if she's a housewife do you, but if she pays bills in that house then y'all nikkas need to shut the fukk up and wash your own draws.

 

[42 Monks]

A lot of these psychotic feminazis have really distorted what being a feminist means. I love how the OP starts off with assuming women are either submissive pawns, or feminist psychos. And these the same dudes repping #GMB heavy when they get cheated on cause they girl met somebody who acknowledges that they're a human being, not a lemming. Stuck in the 50s. Like I said if she's a housewife do you, but if she pays bills in that house then y'all nikkas need to shut the fukk up and wash your own draws.

#GMB is the people that laugh at the sham that is marriage in general. You can do everything right and still lose half over a 'mutual decision to part ways'. Be happy and be together for years, consult a shaman to unify your bond beneath the stars, etc - but never in your life let the government into your relationship because you will always lose.

These other people saying that shyt out of feelings cuz they're insecure, scared, and have a unrealistic image of themselves and power fantasy to match.

 

[FlexPavilion]

Don't mess with chicks that don't have fathers

Gospel

 

[Kenny West]

Is it weird that I knew how all 12 pages of this thread went the moment I read the title?


From the obvious post for daps ("who hurt you")
to the boneheaded deflections ("why is she your ex")
To the inevitable capery.

Maybe yall need to talk about some different shyt, but maybe I just been on this site too long

It was worth it for this gem tho

Don't really feel like it but

You basically make it sound like actually being a man in a relationship is some sort of crime.I don't see how being the leader in the a relationship would in any way shape or form hinder her progress as an human being and honestly I'm still trying to figure out how you even came to such a conclusion.



This also sounds like taking on the role or responsibility of being a man is too much for you which made you sound weak.


Everything else is pretty much white knight/ feminist fluff.

Man close the thread right fukkin here. I hate to pull this card on people but I read the following quotes and it just screams "I'm never getting p*ssy"

The dumbest shyt i ever heard. Female dependence on men in the past came about cause of the necessity to preserve the carrier of children from the elements, hunger & wilderness. plus men were physically stronger there for more fit to endure manual labor. But now in the current information age such a thing isn't needed.

Women make just as much as men, are more educated than their male counterparts at the current time and are allowed more social leeway than the male gender. So to force a woman to be my subservient is to hinder her forward progression as a human. Plus in doing so i as a man would have to take on responsibility for both of our actions which is only going to wear me down and hinder me in the long run; So this whole thing is stupid

It doesn't sound like you guys want a wife. It sounds like you want a slave.

I don't want a servant for a girl.

No diss but I used to think like this.....when I was a virgin. Funny thing is if you were to own your masculinity actual feminine women would be more than happy to do the things yall call being a "slave"/"subservient" or whatever bs you wanna call it. When you articulate this kind dynamic, which is completely NORMAL by the way, it sounds like sorta fukked up. But when you leave the world of rhetoric it's happens naturally. You give direction and she's is gonna be with it or not. But she'd much rather you aggressively give direction than consult her along every step of the way. They like the direction for it's own sake and they'll resent you when you don't assume your role. Women HATE when dudes ask to kiss or touch them, or ask permission for a lot in general yet find it sexy when you aggressively take those liberties (if she's comfortable with you of course)

Her wanting to "follow" and accommodate you is an expression of her trust and affection. This doesn't happen on a logical basis, as you all are aware some women will follow ain't shyt dudes to the depths of hell and curve a simp who's on the way to greener pastures. Masculinity in itself isn't a inherent right or wrong, it can be possessed by a dude mercilessly running thru good girls as much as it can be possessed by an admirable family man or father figure.

 

[The_Truth]

stuff like this makes me realize how wierd gender roles are when it comes to attraction

men are physically strong, right brained thinking creatures that are supposed to be tough but want to be nurtured and babied and a soft companion in general

women are physically weaker, left brained thinking creatures who are supposed to be nurturing and soft, but want to be roughed up in bed and a rugged companion in general

it looks so backwards to me lol

It's called balance.

 

[Drip Bayless]

#GMB is the people that laugh at the sham that is marriage in general. You can do everything right and still lose half over a 'mutual decision to part ways'. Be happy and be together for years, consult a shaman to unify your bond beneath the stars, etc - but never in your life let the government into your relationship because you will always lose.

These other people saying that shyt out of feelings cuz they're insecure, scared, and have a unrealistic image of themselves and power fantasy to match.

Breh you aint gotta school me on #GMB
I fukks wit the team heavy, lowkey I'm still tryna get signed