Why do you nikkas just make shyt up in your heads and actually speak on it with confidence.
I will hurt anybody that talks crazy to me, including a Spanish nikka including an actual nikka, especially a white mfer. You nikkas keep using these white supremacists talking points and trying to pass them off as facts when it's absolute bullshyt. You are doing the same as white men saying "all black people are violent". nikka, there are brown Spanish folks and white skinned Spanish folks. In Brazil, in Columbia, in Puerto Rico, the white skinned Spanish folks discriminate against the brown ones. This is a fact nikka.
No group of people are a monolith and that is nothing but the shyt you learned from white America making you think that bullshyt.
I don't care whom you will hurt. I really don't care. I am pointing out what you are doing in this thread, and your actions demonstrate just how much you are a mirror image of what you claim you hate. You hate the radical Conservatives, but you perform the same actions being a radical Liberal. You speak about attacking others who do not agree with you, you know who does that too? Radical conservatives. You speak with such hatred towards other Black men, even wishing that hispanics harm them. You know who also does that, radical conservatives. You are just as racist towards your brothers who do not agree with you, as radical conservatives are towards us. The difference, you are suppose to be skinfolk.
Your last point, I never said any people are a monolith. I have pointed out though generalities that you can look up yourself if you were inclined to do it. I do find it amazing though how much grace you are willing to give them, while not having that same grace for your own people. You even pish poshed the idea that I should show how removal of illegals benefitted Black American men, because you want us to worry more about safety nets being removed. Well guess what, what good are Safety nets for a group, Black American men, who do not receive them anyway? Why should they be more worried about those safety nets, instead of being worried about the jobs they are unable to acquire? Your argument does not even pass the hierarchy of needs test.
They are people who are being snatched up on the streets with no real due process. Are yall really that pitiful to where innoncent children and family are living in feared all because of loser ass mexican gang bangers?
You are a cornball ass white boy and I would put you in a hospital or a box. Lame ass nikka. I would laugh is an actual Mexican criminal killed yo lame ass because all bytch nikkas deserve to be put down. fukkin fakkit ass nikka.
Wherever they want? Like what kind of question is that? What you think that by the time they start getting rid of black folks that they're going to do it nice and tidy and make sure every goes directly back to their country of origin.
weve been telling them this. then they start laughing and calling black people from la weak, unaware that if they get their numbers up, theyll treat them the exact same way
Your scare tactics aren't based in reality. Europe has healthier food than us for similar prices without needing to have 20 Million Illegal Immigrants from Mexico
huffingtonpost.com The Forgotten Letter of Coretta Scott King
5-6 minutes
In any age of rapidly changing political and partisan perspectives, it is perhaps well to remember how the immigration debate was originally framed back in 1986 when the Reagan/Bush Amnesty plan, put forth to placate the demands of Corporate America for cheap labor, was first enacted. Ignored at the time were the protests which began as early as 1969, when Cesar Chavez and members of the United Farm Workers marched with the Reverend Ralph Abernathy and U.S. Senator Walter Mondale to the border with Mexico to demand the cessation of employers’ practice of importing illegal labor as a means of cutting wages and reducing thousands of their workers to the most grinding poverty.
The government’s response to such protests and demands for economic justice? In the 1980s at a time when African American teenage unemployment approached a disgraceful 80 percent, Big Business cynically petitioned the INS for more visas for cheap foreign labor on grounds that there was an “unskilled labor shortage”. They largely got what they demanded. While Democrats courageously resisted such blatant attempts to lower the wages of legal Hispanic and African Americans, Reagan Amnesty apologists claimed that Americans wouldn’t stoop to perform the “dirty work” that only illegal workers would perform, ignoring the obvious fact that unemployed legal workers gladly and gratefully collect garbage and work in the coal mines if decent wages were paid.
In fact the pleas for economic justice in America were made many years before by the great African American educator, Booker T. Washington, who made his famous “cast down your bucket where you are” speech at the Atlanta International Exposition in 1895. Having recognized the racist and notorious practice of Big Business of importing and hiring cheap immigrant labor in order to avoid hiring African Americans, Washington pleaded: (T)o those (of you) who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth, cast down your bucket where you are. (If you but do so) we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to interlace our industrial, commercial, civil and religious life with yours.”
It should be no surprise, therefore, that these demands for economic justice were taken up by the wife of Martin Luther King, who in 1991 joined with eight CEO’s of America’s leading African American organizations to oppose Republican Senator Orin Hatch’s bill to do away with sanctions against employers who persisted in hiring illegal aliens as a means of discriminating and reducing the wages of against African Americans.
“We are concerned, Senator Hatch” Coretta Scott King wrote in her now largely forgotten letter, “That your proposed remedy…will cause another problem—the revival of …discrimination against black and brown U.S. documented workers, in favor of cheap labor.”
Given the success of Big Business in lobbying the U.S. government to ignore these pleas for economic justice — on grounds of “humanitarianism” no less — it is perhaps the ultimate irony that this success has translated also in flipping the partisan narrative to the point where even legal immigrants have been tricked into adopting the Reagan/Bush agenda against their own economic interest under the ideological banner of the party that for decades opposed it.
But there may now be signs of enlightenment by those who have been most oppressed by the Reagan/Bush agenda. In 2014, by a strong majority of 53 percent, male Latinos voted for the Texas Republican Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who had promised to stop the notorious practice of luring illegal immigrants—even little children— to their deaths in the desert with such promises as amnesty, and in-state-tuition.
And so, gradually the tide may be turning in Booker T. Washington’s and Coretta Scott King’s demand for economic justice. Even in Germany today, where Merkel basked in the “humanitarian” glow of luring hundreds of thousands un-vetted illegal immigrants with promises of cash rewards (but no jobs, of course), the spectacle of teeming throngs of desperate young males being herded into the most degrading “refugee” camps, or worse showered with useless “vouchers,” may be finally revealing to the world the immorality of luring people from their homes, families, and culture for little more than the political aggrandizement of the politicians who created it. The tragedy, of course, is that the billions spent on such self-defeating endeavors could have been instead been spent on providing safety and economic help in zones created for their protection in the home countries.
In America, no true reform can ever come until the most demagogic politicians cease their deliberate obfuscation of the difference between legal and illegal immigration, and begin streamlining the procedures for legal immigration, which is now so difficult that relatively few can navigate or afford it. When this is done, any wall built will always have doors.
There are reports to congress that states yes, they are. Are you an expert on this issue. If you are, may I see your peer reviewed report on the issue? If you want to see the congressional reports by expert economists, you can do a search on this website for them. I posted them up twice before.
You are being myopic. By getting rid of these illegal Immigrants you open up a job market for Americans and since Americans have standards, those who seek employment would demand liveable wages and health insurance which these owners would have to supply due to their businesses failing.
All industries that can and would pay a living wage, if forced to hire actual citizens for the jobs. You know like construction, manufacturing, professional services, and transporting & warehousing.
You are being myopic. By getting rid of these illegal Immigrants you open up a job market for Americans and since Americans have standards, those who seek employment would demand liveable wages and health insurance which these owners would have to supply due to their businesses failing.
He really does not care about that. He just wants to support them, because he feels it is right. What happens to Black Americans is not a concern of his. If he is not Black American, his position does not bother me at all. I in fact expect it from non-Black American ethnicities.
Really, you are playing the "Think of the children" card wth this? You did not even tell us if her family members are illegals or not. Keep in mind, many legal hispanics are fine with the deportations, as demonstrated on a few links above.
Also, plenty of children are living in fear of far worse situations than their parents being deported back to their home countries. Fear of abuse, fear of hunger, fear of losing family members to the prison system, etc. Many of those children, a large portion of those children are Black American. I am inclined to worry more about the children in my own ethnicities problems, then the fear a child has that probably is not a real concern anyway if her mother is a US citizen.
I don't care whom you will hurt. I really don't care. I am pointing out what you are doing in this thread, and your actions demonstrate just how much you are a mirror image of what you claim you hate. You hate the radical Conservatives, but you perform the same actions being a radical Liberal. You speak about attacking others who do not agree with you, you know who does that too? Radical conservatives. You speak with such hatred towards other Black men, even wishing that hispanics harm them. You know who also does that, radical conservatives. You are just as racist towards your brothers who do not agree with you, as radical conservatives are towards us. The difference, you are suppose to be skinfolk.
Your last point, I never said any people are a monolith. I have pointed out though generalities that you can look up yourself if you were inclined to do it. I do find it amazing though how much grace you are willing to give them, while not having that same grace for your own people. You even pish poshed the idea that I should show how removal of illegals benefitted Black American men, because you want us to worry more about safety nets being removed. Well guess what, what good are Safety nets for a group, Black American men, who do not receive them anyway? Why should they be more worried about those safety nets, instead of being worried about the jobs they are unable to acquire? Your argument does not even pass the hierarchy of needs test.
This is what y'all conservatives do. I do believe immigration is an issue, there are ways that they affect us and there are ways that they benefit us. Your failure to realize that is troubling for a dude who i consider educated. Regulating immigration should be a priority, there are plenty of ways to do that shyt. This ain't it. You nikkas ain't being honest with yourselves. Y'all just enjoy seeing somebody else suffer. Nobody in here is pleading for the ones who do foul shyt. They are snatching people up BEFORE THEIR HEARINGS who are going thru the process the right way. Just admit you enjoy watching the harmless ones get punished too. I don't fukk with that shyt for any group of people and I think it's some foul shyt.
I feel like that about Israel and that is self explanatory, legitimately earned.
I'm not no fukkin liberal dawg. Kill that shyt. I ain't nothing like a liberal and I don't identify with a fukkin political ideology. That is some cornball shyt that didn't exist as character identification amongst regular everyday conversation before Trump. My ideology would register closest to a progressive. shyt, an aggressive progressive if you wanna add some detail. You nikkas are being dishonest with yourselves about your cruelty. Yall are better off just saying fukk Mexicans I don't like them instead of trying to justify all the illegal shyt this administration is doing.
Really, you are playing the "Think of the children" card wth this? You did not even tell us if her family members are illegals or not. Keep in mind, many legal hispanics are fine with the deportations, as demonstrated on a few links above.
Also, plenty of children are living in fear of far worse situations than their parents being deported back to their home countries. Fear of abuse, fear of hunger, fear of losing family members to the prison system, etc. Many of those children, a large portion of those children are Black American. I am inclined to worry more about the children in my own ethnicities problems, then the fear a child has that probably is not a real concern anyway if her mother is a US citizen.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Are you trolling??? Did you just compare 5% of black people to 36%???
these Mexicans not coming here and hiring themselves over us. Address the actual problem and stop blaming the help.
now only if I can get you to learn to love abstract art more
