ALonelyDad
Veteran
Still a very deep team that will be mostly fine. Just super funny how average they are against West while being elite vs East, polar opposite of his comments. Biggest worry should be Bane’s injury still lingering.
I literally said in my comment that he was a huge key part of their run and the reason why they picked up the full amount of the last year of that deal.two things
You can’t just say, “outside of Horford.” That’s not how a discussion works. It wasn’t like he was a bit part playet.
Secondly, the Celtics were a veteran team with a lot of experience, despite their ages.
JJJ foul problem is still an issue and makes it difficult for him to be in at the end of games.Still a very deep team that will be mostly fine. Just super funny how average they are against West while being elite vs East, polar opposite of his comments. Biggest worry should be Bane’s injury still lingering.
I know he fouled out yesterdayJJJ foul problem is still an issue and makes it difficult for him to be in at the end of games.
Against the most experienced and successful team in the NBA?They were not a veteran team as the youth and inexperience caught up to them when it mattered most.
I was referring to age in my argument when I was referring to veteran leadership and not experience. It’s why I asked you what was your definition of being a veteran and specifically used Horford as my example.Against the most experienced and successful team in the NBA?
This Celtics group played in three conference finals and been in like four-game sevens. They were an experienced and veteran team who ran into a team who was even more experienced and has a dynastic pedigree.
Fine, but then you moved on to say the Celtics were not a team with veterans despite all the evidence pointing otherwise. Then you said the Celtics lack of experience and reliance youth cost them against the Warriors, which is silly.I was referring to age in my argument when I was referring to veteran leadership and not experience. It’s why I asked you what was your definition of being a veteran and specifically used Horford as my example.
Two eastern conference finals before thattwo things
You can’t just say, “outside of Horford.” That’s not how a discussion works. It wasn’t like he was a bit part playet.
Secondly, the Celtics were a veteran team with a lot of experience, despite their ages.
Again, when I said veteran I was specifically referring to age which is why I used Horford as the example.Fine, but then you moved on to say the Celtics were not a team with veterans despite all the evidence pointing otherwise. Then you said the Celtics lack of experience and reliance youth cost them against the Warriors, which is silly.
The Grizzlies' problem is that they haven't been in enough wars to harden them.
The Celtics have. It’s not the same.
So the Celtics had some veteran presence then. And your statement was to say that veteran presence is overrated. But how can it be overrated if teams can’t succeed without it?Last year with the Celtics outside of Horford, who was a key part of their run. I never said it didn’t value, what I said was that you need vets that will know their role and make a big fuss over it.
That was last year TBHGrizz have gotten to the point now were they need to win something to justify the antics.
I specifically said that it can be overrated when you have situations where the veterans on the team are just as hungry for minutes as the younger players they are supposed to be mentoring.So the Celtics had some veteran presence then. And your statement was to say that veteran presence is overrated. But how can it be overrated if teams can’t succeed without it?