Is intelligent design the biggest argument for the existence of a higher being?

[MMS]

Whichever you believe

God is an evercoming truth that I awaken daily and rejoice in

Jesus Christ is mine and your savior and is risen

whether you believe or dont believe is your own choice to make. Noone is forced to believe anything. However the things your worship and idolize can and will rule over you.

So I make a conscious choice on my belief for reasons of my soul

 

[MMS]

NO THE OLD TESTAMENT IS THE UNALTERED WORD OF GOD, GIVEN TO US ON MOUNT SINAI .. IF U TRULY ARE A CATHOLIC THEN U SHOULD KNOW THIS.

if this is true

then this statement is false

Genesis 3:17

17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

 

[Sccit]

if this is true

then this statement is false

Genesis 3:17

I DONT SEE THE CONNECTION TO WHAT IM SAYIN

ELABORATE

 

[EndDomination]

There is no proof of "intelligent design."

It was a concept cobbled together by religious conservatives to try and combat the introduction of evolution into biology.

Its hogwash.

 

[Marks]

You are the higher being god, peace.

 

[MMS]

I DONT SEE THE CONNECTION TO WHAT IM SAYIN

ELABORATE

The entirety of the Torah explains what has happened in the past (distant past as well) and foretells an infinite curse because it is scribed down (how many eyes have seen it?)

my interpretation of Genesis 3 is the serpent is the tongue, and the wife of Adam SHOULD be the other woman mentioned here:

Gen 1:27

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

yet the second page denotes a separate woman made OUT of Adam rather than in the image of God as stated above.

In other words, the voice of Adams wife is Genesis 2 (and Adam himself in essence), whereas Genesis 1 is the Tree of life

Does the lord rest? And if so, why would anyone desire it?

 

[HoldThisL]

if time doesn't exist...then this reality becomes a multiform, constantly churning and self-replicating infinite life form.

if you say that things werent put in place, maybe you are right. But if you say they are put in place, maybe you are right

in either case, what difference does it make of knowing or not knowing? Peace of mind?

science seems to suggest our current reality on earth is highly ideal relative what has been discovered/measured elsewhere and much easier to maintain

I have a open mind, which is why I love both science and religon. I believe in things until I see concrete proof that they do not exist, rather than the opposite. The truth of the matter is nobody knows about what really happened during the start of time and religon is the one that fills in those holes the best imo.

It makes sense to me that we didn't just come to be and everything is just way too massive out there. Humanity on earth will probably die out before the universe is truly discovered.

 

[Drip Bayless]

there is no scientific proof of evolution unless you believe the delusions of a known racist
On the Origin of Species - Wikipedia.

 

[Kwéyòl]

Our universe might just be a cycle of collapsing into self creating a black hole then exploding. Also the universe is still a very very chaotic place. The earth might have absorbed a planet it crashed into Theia (planet) - Wikipedia
Organization . The next solar storm is bout to knock us into a medieval times. A random asteroid from Jupiter could fukk our day. A random gamma ray could take our atoms

Theres no intelligent design
The solar system is basically a death trap

Exactly universe is is wild fukking place

 

[MMS]

I have a open mind, which is why I love both science and religon. I believe in things until I see concrete proof that they do not exist, rather than the opposite. The truth of the matter is nobody knows about what really happened during the start of time and religon is the one that fills in those holes the best imo.

It makes sense to me that we didn't just come to be and everything is just way too massive out there. Humanity on earth will probably die out before the universe is truly discovered.

i agree with that. Science is great because you can discern whats to come with material things. However the material things are not important to our souls. The spiritual things are, so if we devote our lives to material things or material derived things we will become derived static things and forget the dynamic creation we wake up to.

this is why I dont believe God would condemn us because we still live. And if God truly wished to condemn us we would not draw breath.

Most people love to contemplate existence and whether there is God or no God, but has anyone truly contemplated nonexistence? To have no feedback, no understanding of whether youre alive or dead, to be undifferentiated? This is why atheist are silly to me. Because if you are right then you lose, and if you are wrong you still lose

We are living in a world of illusion

 

[Sccit]

The entirety of the Torah explains what has happened in the past (distant past as well) and foretells an infinite curse because it is scribed down (how many eyes have seen it?)

my interpretation of Genesis 3 is the serpent is the tongue, and the wife of Adam SHOULD be the other woman mentioned here:

Gen 1:27


yet the second page denotes a separate woman made OUT of Adam rather than in the image of God as stated above.

In other words, the voice of Adams wife is Genesis 2 (and Adam himself in essence), whereas Genesis 1 is the Tree of life

Does the lord rest? And if so, why would anyone desire it?

SO THIS IS YOUR OWN INTERPRETATION, WHICH IS ACTUALLY WRONG. THERE IS ONLY 1 WOMAN- CHAVA AKA EVE.

THE FACT THAT THE TORAH DETAILS THE PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WIT IT BEIN THE FIRST AND ONLY DIVIN WORD OF GOD, GIVEN ON MOUNT SINAI

 

[MMS]

SO THIS IS YOUR OWN INTERPRETATION, WHICH IS ACTUALLY WRONG. THERE IS ONLY 1 WOMAN- CHAVA AKA EVE.

THE FACT THAT THE TORAH DETAILS THE PAST HAS NOTHING TO DO WIT IT BEIN THE FIRST AND ONLY DIVIN WORD OF GOD, GIVEN ON MOUNT SINAI

we are all free to make our own interpretations and i wont judge you for yours. However, there is a logical inconsistency between Genesis 1 and Genesis 2

 

[Sccit]

we are all free to make our own interpretations and i wont judge you for yours. However, there is a logical inconsistency between Genesis 1 and Genesis 2

I DONT SEE IT

IF U BREAK IT DOWN FURTHER ILL TRY MY BEST TO EXPLAIN

 

[Emoryal]

SO U BELIEVE A CREATION CAN EXIST WITOUT A CREATOR?

AND U THINK WERE DUMB??

You sound retarded. You literally just proved my point.

 

[Koichos]

YEA MOST THE PEOPLE HERE ARE GODLESS

אֲמֶרִיקָה אֻמָּה רֵיקָה​