I don't think you get it. First off how would a person know what works and doesn't work yeah you can use google but there's a gazillion different workouts and routines and for someone who just wants to lose weight, it'll be too overbearing. There's certain things in life ppl are just willing to pay that extra money for
If you live In Miami or Broward dont let your girl train with a nikka named Dietrict some shyt like that he pretty much fukk all his clients its hilarious![]()
That's a Good one.
Cutting hair
Little league ref
EXACTLY.man youre not gonna sell me on the fact that you NEED some motherfukker to tell you this, well agree to disagree
![]()
How to Do It
It's simple: If your heart is beating faster, your lungs are working harder, and you can talk comfortably -- but can't sing -- you are likely working out at a level that is ideal for improving your cardiovascular health and losing weight. When you get to the point where talking becomes even more difficult and you can't say more than a few words, you've reached another level of exercise intensity. That level is going to burn more calories and improve your performance, but it's more difficult to sustain for a long period of time. If you're pedaling that bike so fast that you can't speak more than a single word, you're probably won't be able to sustain it for more than a few minutes. As a general rule, aim for the "easy to talk" zone for longer exercise sessions, the "harder to talk" zone for shorter, faster sessions of 20 minutes or less, and the "really hard to talk" zone only very sparingly.
man youre not gonna sell me on the fact that you NEED some motherfukker to tell you this, well agree to disagree
![]()
Abstract
Objective: The authors examined the effect of certified personal trainer services on exercise behavior by using the transtheoretical model of behavioral change. Participants: Female college students (n = 449) completed surveys during the first week (T1) and last week (T2) of the fall semester. Methods: Students receiving personal trainer services during the fall semester (experimental group, n = 31) were cross-matched with students who had not received services (control group, n = 31). Results: The control group demonstrated a statistically significant regression in stage of exercise change scores; the experimental group did not. The authors found the 2 groups to have a statistically significant difference in the pattern of exercise behavior change over the course of the semester, with more active maintainers and progressors in the experimental group. Conclusions: Cognitive and behavioral processes of change, decisional balance, and scheduling self-efficacy significantly decreased in the control group, whereas cognitive processes of change, decisional balance, and scheduling self-efficacy remained statistically unchanged in the experimental group.
The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the influence of resistance training with a personal trainer versus unsupervised resistance training on the self-selected intensities used by women during resistance exercise. Forty-six resistance-trained women (age = 26.6 ± 6.4 years; body mass = 64.2 ± 10.9 kg) who either trained individually (n = 27; No PT) or with a personal trainer (n = 19; PT) were carefully instructed to select a weight they used in their own resistance training workouts that enabled the completion of 10 repetitions for the chest press (CP), leg press (LP), seated row (SR), and leg extension (LE) exercises. Each participant was subsequently tested for one repetition-maximum (1RM) strength on each exercise, and the self-selected intensity was calculated based on a percent of each 1RM value. For self-selected relative intensity, the PT group selected significantly greater intensities for LP (50% vs. 41%), CP (57.4% vs. 48%), and SR (56% vs. 42%) whereas a trend (p = 0.10) was observed for LE (43% vs. 38%) compared with No PT. Overall, the average self-selected intensity for all exercises was ~51.4% in PT group and ~42.3% in the No PT group. 1RM values for LP, LE, and SR were greater in the PT than No PT group. Ratings of perceived exertion values were significantly greater in the PT compared with the No PT group for CP, LE, and SR but not LP. These results indicate that resistance training under the supervision of a personal trainer leads to greater initial 1RM strength values, self-selection of greater workout intensities, and greater ratings of perceived exertion values during resistance exercise.
ALL THIS SOUNDS well and good. but the truth is. i have know a ton of people that have had personal traininers(mostly women). and all of them have quit at some point. most of them quit early in the game. perhaps the PT got them to workout for 4 more weeks then normal. great. but they're back out of shape and back talking about "i need a personal trainer." NO YOU DONT.First off a good personal trainer isn't just there to tell you what and how to workout but they're a motivator. Secondly people are motivated to accomplish a task when they have skin on the game. If you're spending money per session, best believe you won't miss a session vs trying to do it on your own, you'll start cheating yourself and start skipping days.
There are many scientific studies proving the benefit of a personal trainer. You take a group of people working out with a trainer and compare their results to those doing it by themselves and the ones with a trainer will pretty much always have better results.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JACH.56.44.369-376#.U-E8TPldXIM
http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/A...cted_Resistance_Training_Intensity_in.16.aspx
now dems are the folks you should be training. these entertainer dudes wives. they aint doing nothing all day for the most part but trying to keep it tight and right for their boo. and they got money to blow. thats easy money if you can get into that circle.I got 2 of my boys who do this..and yes they make very good money. All their clients come from instagram and word of mouth. One of them was training that basketball wives chic jennifer williams.
man cutting hair is not a good hustle. unless you get years in and build your clientle up. unless your a celebrity barber or you own your own shop. i couldnt rock with being a barber. the guy that cuts my hair told me he has to pay the owner 30% of his earnings. lets say you average 10 heads a day monday thru friday. $20 a cut times 50 is 1000. thats 300 dollars you paying in rent plus you gotta pay your taxes.
Saw my friend over the weekend that's an independent personal trainer, he calls what he does a hobby and said he can never work a "real job" ever again. This is a dude that charges $130 an hour and makes around 100k a year, when you break that down it comes out to around 800 total work hours per year or 15 per week. His only complaint would be the irregular hours, some days he'll work at 7am and then wont have another session till 11pm, but even then a huge chunk of his day is free to do whatever he wants. I knew he made a good amount, I didn't know his work week was so open like that though or that he viewed it as a hobby, most of his client base is from word of mouth and he deals with professionals.
With 3/4 of the country being overweight or obese I can't really think of a better field to get into, especially if you're a former fat dude that can use your transformation pics as your resume. I may have to get ACE/NASM certified and train some people on the sideIf you're in good shape and live in a fairly large city you should get certs brehs
![]()