What is wrong with that ?
Personally I think the best solution is for Arab and Muslim countries to take in all the Palestinians and settle them and for monetary compensation to be paid to them by Israel and the international community.
Israel is too small to be a country for two peoples.
Historically it was a Jewish land, and the Arabs however long their sojourn are the interlopers if you want the truth.
.
Thats great. You have not proven you have the knowledge or intellect that justifies why any of us should give a fukk about your useless opinion
There are 22 Arab states, there is only 1 Jewish state. I don't believe in having 23rd Arab state in place of the lone Jewish state.
.
Except no one here suggests that.
Tough luck for them. I have no particular affection for Arabs seeing how they treat my people.
I dont have any affection for Pakistanis who discriminate against my Pashtun people, but that doesnt mean I would cheerlead an Indian occupation of their land, and the denial of human rights to them, for example. Its because Im not a emotional moron with the intellect of a child. Having standards and a set of values doesnt sway depending on who the victim or the oppressor is. Right is right and wrong is wrong.
Moreover, on the grievance scale they rank at the bottom of dispossessed peoples: Kurds, Aborigines, Native Americans are far more deserving of our sympathy and solidarity. Despite this, they have a UN agency dedicated to them, Arab keep bytching about their cause, EU kisses their ass and you have clueless African states equating their struggle to apartheid.
More childish emotional banter. The pain others suffer, even if much greater, and even if more ignored, doesnt negate the pain of the Palestinians. Only social retards think the way you do.
Personally I believe if they were not as violent as they are Israel would have reached some form of accomodation with them long time ago. Israelis are smart and just want to concentrate on making their economy and country better. But just look at Gaza, when israel withdrew unilaterally Hamas took over and started a war on Israel.
Except nothing in the entire 120 year history of the conflict can logically lead to the conclusion you just drew. If European Zionists in the late 19th century clearly planned a campaign to ethnically cleanse Palestine of its Arabs, then what the fukk did it matter if the Arabs were violent decades later.
And the Hamas-Gaza withdrawal angle is bullshyt. No war was started by Hamas. These are all lies and propaganda. Last time I proved one of your lies wrong, you ignored the point and starting crying about the authors. Wont happen this time. Put up proof for your assertion or suck a dikk.
They are not a normal people, even their brothers; the Arabs will tell you that. The why no Arab country accepts them, they have a stigma they come with a violence package and trouble.
I know it hurts your falas dizi psyche but your people ain't shyt
There are many factors that explain Palestinian relations with its Arab neighbours. Nothing you mentioned is one of them. Stay in your lane clown, politics and history is not for you. DeVry graduating retard.
QUOTE="Moich, post: 28639901, member: 34439"]
I normally have a thing for underdogs as I said, Tibetans, Native Americans, and other dispossed indigenous peoples are far more deserving of my sympathies than a spoiled muslims. I rarely sympathize with Muslims knowing how shytty their beliefs are and their intolerance.[/QUOTE]
Spoken like a true donkey.
)
