Jamie Foxx posts cryptic IG post; Ends up being called anti-Semitic by Hollywood celebs

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
24,342
Reputation
7,718
Daps
132,219
Jesus called himself the king of Jews that’s why the Roman’s wanted him out of there because that was treason to the Roman state. Also you have to remember the Jews were going hard with revolutionary leaders and martyrs. Barabbas was swapped with him

What’s funny is a couple of Jewish people have been sucking off Nick Fuentes as of late but no smoke
 

inndaskKy

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
12,358
Reputation
3,034
Daps
44,502
Reppin
NULL
That's what I'm saying. If Romans ruled the land, they had the choice to kill him or not, regardless of what Jews wanted. They chose to kill him because most probably it was in the Empire's interest too to do so.

The Roman Empire being a political entity it doesn't strike me as strange that one could at the same time have Roman citizenship and be a Jew.

I'm not sure what you mean by "Rome not being Europe yet", continents are continents breh. And of course most european languages didn't exist back then.

And I'm not sure what you mean by "Hitler antisemitism was completely different than actions before", there were pogroms since forever in Europe, ghettos too, antisemitic propaganda, etc. Antisemitism has been in the European fabric for centuries, literraly. Only Euros say the opposite, again in order to act as if Nazis came out of nowhere and to make people "forget" that Europe has been antisemitic since forever. Of course some of the forms of said antisemitism change, just like forms of other forms or hatred change too. Anti-Black racism isn't the same in 2023 as it was in the 18th century either.
Hitler's antisemitism is different because it was based on a mistaken biological race theory that was a misapplication of Darwin's theory. His antisemitism was more truly antisemitic because it was based on ethnicity and based on the concept of semitic people which was popular at the time. It isn't used much anymore though.

So it is not clear what you mean by "antisemitic since forever". My point was that whatever happened to jews throughout the ages is not part of some master conspiracy against jews out of " antisemitism". That is a very jewish POV way of describing it, seeing all people of the same semitic origins as them as having experienced the same struggle again and again as part of some grand story. That's more of a religious belief than a historical one..

That's why I say you need to give a clearer definition. The analogy with black people doesn't work because slavery and modern oppression are much more clearly rooted in the same basic ingrained belief by white people that they are somehow biologically and therefore morally superior.
 

Rhapscallion Démone

♊Dogset Emperor and Sociopathic Socialite ♊
Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
30,683
Reputation
19,766
Daps
140,506
Screenshot-20230805-110454-Chrome
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,031
Reputation
4,114
Daps
54,711
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
Hitler's antisemitism is different because it was based on a mistaken biological race theory that was a misapplication of Darwin's theory. His antisemitism was more truly antisemitic because it was based on ethnicity and based on the concept of semitic people which was popular at the time. It isn't used much anymore though.

So it is not clear what you mean by "antisemitic since forever". My point was that whatever happened to jews throughout the ages is not part of some master conspiracy against jews out of " antisemitism". That is a very jewish POV way of describing it, seeing all people of the same semitic origins as them as having experienced the same struggle again and again as part of some grand story. That's more of a religious belief than a historical one..

That's why I say you need to give a clearer definition. The analogy with black people doesn't work because slavery and modern oppression are much more clearly rooted in the same basic ingrained belief by white people that they are somehow biologically and therefore morally superior.

You're just confirming what I'm saying. 19/20th century antisemitism was based on pseudo-science (that started long before Nazis, they just "perfected" it, which is what Euros want you to forget), just as anti-black racism was also based on pseudo-science at the same period. Before that it wasn't based on pseudo-science, but on religious/cultural bs, for the simple and quite obvious reason that science didn't have such a prominent role. Hatred adapts to circumstances, I think anyone can understand that.

And what I mean by "antisemitic since forever" is that Jews have been ostracized since forever in Europe. Sometimes more violently than others (obviously, otherwise they would have been long gone). And that happened all over Europe. Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, etc. It's no "master conspiracy", it was just widespread prejudice. Similar to what's happening to Muslims now all over Europe, the prejudice and discrimination are widespread. Not sure how anyone who knows anything about European history can deny that :patrice:

When you say that anti-black racism is ingrained clearly in the same belief (biologically and morally inferior), same can be said for Jews. It's been clearly ingrained that Jews somehow "control everything", are "close to money", "not to be trusted", etc. And of course pseudo-science also put them in a biologicaly inferior position to White people, that only changed post WW2.
 

UncleTomFord15

Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2015
Messages
17,766
Reputation
285
Daps
137,478
They'll jump up and down saying blacks are now "the most anti semetic" but get quiet when asked how many Jewish people have black people systemically killed? How many have black people wrongfully jailed or enslaved? How many jobs have a black person denied them, etc.

They look at themselves as white but don't get the love whites and are scared to really beef with them; so they take out their anger out on blacks.
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,031
Reputation
4,114
Daps
54,711
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
It was the Romans but the jews sold him out to the Romans.

He was making the clerics look bad. So they sold him out. Judas' job was to point out which one was Jesus

But why did the Romans do their dirty work though? Romans were the ones in control. They must've gained something too, they didn't have to follow orders.
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
35,036
Reputation
3,006
Daps
84,729
Reppin
2016
But why did the Romans do their dirty work though? Romans were the ones in control. They must've gained something too, they didn't have to follow orders.
No. both of then wanted to get rid of jesus. The Clerics because people started following Jesus and listened to his word and The Romans bc Jesus sway over the people threatened the order of sht....


basically politics got jesus out of there.


Think about right if some figure emerged that helped people without taking their money like pastors, without hypocrisy like the church, united the people and successfully changed laws thats detrimental to powers that be, they'll definitely get him/her out of there :russ:
 
Top