This is a dumbass argument and it's one of those skin in the game arguments that is really flawed. It ignores the limitations that the average person must contend with in creating change. A person can analyze Jay's actions and understand their flaws, even if there intricacies they cant fully grasp.
This type of argument is used by people to insulate themselves from criticism. But what happens if someone who has actually gotten /kept people out of jail criticizes Jay's actions? Would he suddenly be willing to listen and acknowledge his shortcomings? Lol probably not.
Ignoring that this could just be Jay-Z using that statement as a way to shield himself from criticism.
You have to also look at it in another light !
Why are entertainers/actors/musicians etc. seen as individuals expected to have the power to cause
sweeping change in society ? And why is it that people are most ready to band together to dole out criticism
when they themselves DO NOT contribute to society in any meaningful way beyond being normal, law abiding citizens ?
It's easy to to criticize pop stars and rappers for their lack of activism, it's MUCH harder to really sit and come up with reasons
for their own inaction.
The same people typing up diatribes coming up with a myriad of reasons for defending or attacking Jay-Z could be thinking
about volunteering to tutor students at their local elementary, middle & highschools. Those same people could be participating in
cleaning up trash around their communities. Those same people could be contributing to a local non profit.
There's a lot we can ALL DO and dismissing Jay-Z's statements at face value don't allow for deeper discussion of activism as a
daily part of one's life