Jon Stewart stays bringing the heat on gun crime statistics.

[Remote]

 

[UberEatsDriver]

I believe 80% of guns in NY come from Virginia and South and North Carolina.

A southern dude just got locked up in NY for trafficking guns


Edit: I see he mentioned NY also but yea he said GA,SC and FL I always thought it was N/C Carolina’s and VA

 

[Roger king]

If you want change in gun laws vote democrats and vote for them consistently thats the fundamental answer and solution to this. Only one political party wants to ban these dangerous rifles and wants an assault weapons ban. The GOP has shown no genuine interest in addressing the issue, their idea is more guns the better!

 

[↓R↑LYB]

There's over 400 million guns in America and ~900,000 3D printers (used to manufacture ghost guns).

No amount of legislation is going to fix this problem.

 

[Remote]

There's over 400 million guns in America and ~900,000 3D printers (used to manufacture ghost guns).

No amount of legislation is going to fix this problem.

I don't see why not.
Since legislation is what created this problem in the first place.

 

[saturn7]

No he didn't. He pointed out that a majority of the gun confiscated in big Blue Cities come from outside that city or state. So that means the people who brought those guns into those cities were **say it with me** BREAKING THE LAW.

Criminals don't follow the fukking laws. No matter how many stupid fukking gun laws get passed that won't stop people from breaking the law.

Liberals live in a fantasy world where they think they can just pass laws and bad things won't happen.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

I don't see why not.
Since legislation is what created this problem in the first place.

How are you going to legislate it? Make guns illegal? You have 400 million (and counting) already in circulation and the criminals don't care about the law.

And even if you ban all guns, we have 3D printers now. Are you going to ban 3D printers as well?

 

[↓R↑LYB]

No he didn't. He pointed out that a majority of the gun confiscated in big Blue Cities come from outside that city or state. So that means the people who brought those guns into those cities were **say it with me** BREAKING THE LAW.

Criminals don't follow the fukking laws. No matter how many stupid fukking gun laws get passed that won't stop people from breaking the law.

Liberals live in a fantasy world where they think they can just pass laws and bad things won't happen.

In order to address the gun violence problem in America, do you suggest we have more guns on the streets or less guns ?

 

[Sir Richard Spirit]

Most people buying guns in Indiana are Indiana residents who grew up in Chicago. You can buy a gun in Hammond, Indiana legally and be back in Illinois within 2 minutes. Back in Chicago within a 10.

 

[YouMadd?]

If you want change in gun laws vote democrats and vote for them consistently thats the fundamental answer and solution to this. Only one political party wants to ban these dangerous rifles and wants an assault weapons ban. The GOP has shown no genuine interest in addressing the issue, their idea is more guns the better!

you’re an agent…. I just can’t imagine a actual black male saying these words.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

Most people buying guns in Indiana are Indiana residents who grew up in Chicago. You can buy a gun in Hammond, Indiana legally and be back in Illinois within 2 minutes. Back in Chicago within a 10.

I grew up in NYC and I was fukking SHOCKED the first time I went to my first gun show in the south. I took one of my brothers and he was like "how the fukk is all this shyt legal?!?" nikkas had kevlar, level 3 armor plates, armored plate carriers, swords, AKs, ARs, 100 round drums, tactical vests, tactical helmets, etc.

At the gun store right up the street from me they're selling a damn gatling gun

 

[Remote]

No he didn't. He pointed out that a majority of the gun confiscated in big Blue Cities come from outside that city or state. So that means the people who brought those guns into those cities were **say it with me** BREAKING THE LAW.

Criminals don't follow the fukking laws. No matter how many stupid fukking gun laws get passed that won't stop people from breaking the law.

Liberals live in a fantasy world where they think they can just pass laws and bad things won't happen.

I’ve heard this silly argument all the time.
Here’s what you sound like:

Murderers don’t care about the law so making murder illegal doesn’t stop murder.

 

[Remote]

In order to address the gun violence problem in America, do you suggest we have more guns on the streets or less guns ?

Does the proliferation of nukes make nuclear war more likely or less likely?

It’s easier to see the flaw in your question when you apply it elsewhere.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

Does the proliferation of nukes make nuclear war more likely or less likely?

It’s easier to see the flaw in your question when you apply it elsewhere.

Yes, the proliferation of nukes make nuclear war more likely. It's why countries has signed treaties to reduce the number of nuclear arms on the planet.

Nuclear Arms Control Treaties

This section contains summaries of all the major arms-control treaties including: Limited Test Ban Treaty, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty I (Interim Agreement), Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Threshold Test Ban Treaty, Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty...

www.atomicarchive.com

New START Treaty - United States Department of State

Treaty Structure: The Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, also known as the New START Treaty, enhances U.S. national security by placing verifiable limits on all Russian deployed...

www.state.gov

Both the United States and the Russian Federation met the central limits of the New START Treaty by February 5, 2018, and have stayed at or below them ever since. Those limits are:

• 700 deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), deployed submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and deployed heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments;
• 1,550 nuclear warheads on deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs, and deployed heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments (each such heavy bomber is counted as one warhead toward this limit);
• 800 deployed and non-deployed ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments.

New START limits all Russian deployed intercontinental-range nuclear weapons, including every Russian nuclear warhead that is loaded onto an intercontinental-range ballistic missile that can reach the United States in approximately 30 minutes. It also limits the deployed Avangard and the under development Sarmat, the two most operationally available of the Russian Federation’s new long-range nuclear weapons that can reach the United States. Extending New START ensures we will have verifiable limits on the mainstay of Russian nuclear weapons that can reach the U.S. homeland for the next five years. As of the most recent data exchange on September 1, 2020, the Russian Federation declared 1,447 deployed strategic warheads. The Russian Federation has the capacity to deploy many more than 1,550 warheads on its modernized ICBMs and SLBMs, as well as heavy bombers, but is constrained from doing so by New START.

So back to my question, do you suggest we need more guns or less guns to address the gun problem in the US ?

 

[Remote]

Yes, the proliferation of nukes make nuclear war more likely. It's why countries has signed treaties to reduce the number of nuclear arms on the planet.

Nuclear Arms Control Treaties

This section contains summaries of all the major arms-control treaties including: Limited Test Ban Treaty, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty I (Interim Agreement), Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Threshold Test Ban Treaty, Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty...

www.atomicarchive.com

New START Treaty - United States Department of State

Treaty Structure: The Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, also known as the New START Treaty, enhances U.S. national security by placing verifiable limits on all Russian deployed...

www.state.gov

So back to my question, do you suggest we need more guns or less guns to address the gun problem in the US ?

Quite obviously less.
What on earth would make you think I’d want more guns on the street?

I’m legitimately baffled at your question.