More likely than not he'll put together a career worthy of top 15 consideration, and be the 3rd best SF to ever play with an outside shot at Bird.
In 1968 MVP Wilt Chamberlain and the #1 record 76ers lost a 3-1 lead to the Boston Celtics. He didn't shoot in the 2nd half of game 7 amid frustration with his team and coach. He demanded a trade to the team that Boston beat in the Finals, joining Jerry West & Elgin Baylor.
Nobody ever talks about this when ranking him among the greats and I'd hope people don't talk about Durant's decison when ranking him either 30 years from now. because at the end of the day all that matters is how good they are at basketball.
Compare a 32 year old Wilt out of his prime joining a team to finally win a championship(after struggling against the Celtics his entire career) to Durant joining the Warriors, while in his prime, after failing to beat them when going up 3-1 in a series against them.
Wilt could have also demanded a trade to the Celtics and teamed up with the team that beat him his whole career yet he didn't. Wilt also didn't have a top 5 player on his team, now did he?
This definitely deserves to be put against his legacy considering the way he did it. He wasn't good enough to beat a team during his prime so he went and joined them to win with a far lesser role. Why exactly should that be ignored? He had help in OKC and they were clearly capable of winning the finals with the team they had, but he just wanted a FAR EASIER route. Why should that be looked at positively? People might have held the Miami shyt against Lebron for his career too if he didn't go back and win one for Cleveland, which certainly added to his legacy more than the two that he won with Miami.




