Kevin Samuels Discussion Thread

[CarmelBarbie]

Disclaimer: I’m married and never had issues getting sex.

I firmly agree. I understand the proper context because I watched it when he said it. There’s the unwritten rule that a woman knows within 5 minutes of meeting a man if she would fukk him. Women are on record saying that. On the menu, meaning “both parties are grown and should be fully aware that if things go right they’re content with having consensual sex with one another.” That’s on the menu. Chicks are going out with men that it’s not even on the menu.

If she wants someone to kick it with then have lunch with said person.

Kendra G is just salty over their interaction and made her look silly. She’s literally using the same formula as KS with bottom of the barrel folks. She loves to bring up him not being but evades mentioning that he has been married. Married twice and not one of them has been married ever.

You agree with everything he says. You do realize that a woman can know she wants to fukk you within the first 5 minutes and still not fukk you on the first date even if went well. She may want to get to know you better. She may want you to take an STD test. She may not want to be seen as too easy.

You didn’t have sex on the first date with your wife breh. Like come on now. I know y’all are tired of being used for dates but there’s no unwritten rule that a woman will consent to have sex with him on the first date just because it was after 5PM and Kevin said so. Women will continue to go on dates after 5 and some will fukk. And some will not. It’s a gamble.

And y’all don’t have to take a chance and go on date or pay for one if you don’t want to be used. Brehs can pay for escorts and stop going on dates if they want guaranteed sex without a risk, or point blank let a woman know that’s sex is an expectation and see how she responds to avoid wasting both your times. But there’s literally nothing else a breh can do if a woman chooses not to fukk him on the first date,

 

[CarmelBarbie]

It's not a matter of sex on the first date. Men are simply tired of being used by women who have no real interest in them. Why is this so controversial?

Girl you know that it’s his statement that is controversial. The notion that if a woman agrees to a date and it’s after 5 she should be down to fukk is silly. If he would have said the bolded that’s one thing, but he made controversial by coming up with some unwritten rule that simply does not apply and won’t for many women. I’ve never gone on dates unless I have some interest. But I know women use men for dates, I think it’s wrong too. My argument is against his silly statement. I also believe if Brehs really want guaranteed sex and don’t want to waste their time, they should just get an escort and Kim.

 

[HarlemHottie]

You didn’t have sex on the first date with your wife breh. Like come on now

We did and it wasn't even a date. We had talked on the phone for about two weeks and I invited him over randomly, with the full intent of fukking him. He walked through 3ft of snow for that.

 

[HarlemHottie]

My argument is against his silly statement.

Then your argument is uninformed bc you saw 15 seconds of a 45 m- 1hr monologue. I'm sure he explained himself. This is what I mean by bad faith.

(I like you, we have no beef, I'm not 'coming for you.' We just talking.)

 

[Leao2005]

That's not an answer.

I'm looking for the rest of the paragraph bc I notice ppl like to take a single out of context statement and run with it when he's usually included the necessary conditions. This happens every time. It's bad faith.

I can’t think of a specific video because that quote I don’t think was a standout topic. It’s also added on to whatever acronym or topic he’s talking bout

 

[Leao2005]

well if you don’t want to have wait for an arbitrary number of dates, why don’t you just pay for an escort and get sex right away? Stop going on dates. only use your money for escorts. You’ll get guaranteed sex every time.

Due to religion I don’t believe in sex before at Least a relationship, but five dates without a relationship/sex is insane and telling a man to get a professional is not a valid retort back.
It’s Why women on Twitter and etc complain dudes don’t do dates anymore.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

You agree with everything he says. You do realize that a woman can know she wants to fukk you within the first 5 minutes and still not fukk you on the first date even if went well. She may want to get to know you better. She may want you to take an STD test. She may not want to be seen as too easy.

You didn’t have sex on the first date with your wife breh. Like come on now. I know y’all are tired of being used for dates but there’s no unwritten rule that a woman will consent to have sex with him on the first date just because it was after 5PM and Kevin said so. Women will continue to go on dates after 5 and some will fukk. And some will not. It’s a gamble.

And y’all don’t have to take a chance and go on date or pay for one if you don’t want to be used. Brehs can pay for escorts and stop going on dates if they want guaranteed sex without a risk, or point blank let a woman know that’s sex is an expectation and see how she responds to avoid wasting both your times. But there’s literally nothing else a breh can do if a woman chooses not to fukk him on the first date,

Yes, I know she doesn’t have to have sex on the first date. Just because something is on a menu doesn’t mean we have to consume it. One day you may want steak, one day it’s salmon, and another it’s salad. It’s about it being on the menu and not a contract saying anyone has to have sex. Men can and do turn down sex with women. Go out with someone you wouldn’t mind having sex with on the first, second, third or fourth date. That’s fair. Women are exploiting men they damn well know have zero chance of sniffing that coota cat.

It’s like people are trying to find some false narrative to bring the man down.

 

[HarlemHottie]

It’s like people are trying to find some false narrative to bring the man down

That's what I meant about the "This will lead to sexual assault" claims. They be doing too much, imo, bc there's no real argument to what he's actually saying (not the mistranslated version).

 

[8WON6]

For everybody saying dates shouldn't lead to sex, if your significant other was out with another person of the opposite sex after 5pm on a "date that isn't leading to sex" yall should be cool with it right? If they explained "well just because we on a date, that doesn't mean its leading to sex...we just enjoying each other company".

 

[Umoja]

Yes, I know she doesn’t have to have sex on the first date. Just because something is on a menu doesn’t mean we have to consume it. One day you may want steak, one day it’s salmon, and another it’s salad. It’s about it being on the menu and not a contract saying anyone has to have sex. Men can and do turn down sex with women. Go out with someone you wouldn’t mind having sex with on the first, second, third or fourth date. That’s fair. Women are exploiting men they damn well know have zero chance of sniffing that coota cat.

It’s like people are trying to find some false narrative to bring the man down.

All of this Juelzing.

If you go to the restaurant and something is on the menu, what would you expect if you asked for it? How would you respond if you asked for something on the menu and they told you no.

Trying to paint this story of him referring to women who are just not interested in the guy, when his logic extends to all women.

And to put the nail in the coffin, if he was referring to interest, there would be no use to raise time as a barrier. I hope that you're not going to try an argue that he's okay with women scamming free meals during lunch hours.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

All of this Juelzing.

If you go to the restaurant and something is on the menu, what would you expect if you asked for it? How would you respond if you asked for something on the menu and they told you no.

Trying to paint this story of him referring to women who are just not interested in the guy, when his logic extends to all women.

And to put the nail in the coffin, if he was referring to interest, there would be no use to raise time as a barrier. I hope that you're not going to try an argue that he's okay with women scamming free meals during lunch hours.

Would be disappointed and choose something else or leave the restaurant. So, what point was not made?

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

For everybody saying dates shouldn't lead to sex, if your significant other was out with another person of the opposite sex after 5pm on a "date that isn't leading to sex" yall should be cool with it right? If they explained "well just because we on a date, that doesn't mean its leading to sex...we just enjoying each other company".

Women know to downplay stuff that greatly benefits them.​

 

[JuvenileHell]

For everybody saying dates shouldn't lead to sex, if your significant other was out with another person of the opposite sex after 5pm on a "date that isn't leading to sex" yall should be cool with it right? If they explained "well just because we on a date, that doesn't mean its leading to sex...we just enjoying each other company".

who let's their significant other go out on "dates"?

 

[8WON6]

who let's their significant other go out on "dates"?

apparently, some people here think dating isn't supposed to lead to sex. So, what's the purpose of dating if it not leading to sex? If yall say dating is on some platonic shyt, then you shouldn't be mad if your significant other was going out on these non-sexual dates at night, right?

 

[CarmelBarbie]

Due to religion I don’t believe in sex before at Least a relationship, but five dates without a relationship/sex is insane and telling a man to get a professional is not a valid retort back.
It’s Why women on Twitter and etc complain dudes don’t do dates anymore.

Y’all are hilarious. The bolded made me laugh. What religion do you follow where it’s okay to have sex in a relationship but not as a one night stand/or encounter with an escort? What your saying is that you don’t want to wait to have sex after a certain number of dates but you also don’t want to pay for guaranteed sex with an escort? Are you really making a girl your gf after a few dates, and at that point it’s okay to have sex? I’m just trying to understand. At this point it seems like you all think your entitled to sex because she goes on a date with you, and that’s why I said that if it’s sex you want just get an escort.