Most handguns have a standard capacity of 8-16 rounds, can be reloaded in seconds and concealed, so I would say yesCan it kill dozens of people in a matter of seconds? That's th fundamental difference.
Most handguns have a standard capacity of 8-16 rounds, can be reloaded in seconds and concealed, so I would say yes
As an term assault style makes no sense and has no definition with regard to rifles. Any rifle can be an assault rifle, since the term was arbitrarily created.The assault style rifles being discussed weren't invented yet, and when they were, and freely legal and available, it still didn't stop any sort violence.
What part of assault rifle implies defense anyway? Never understood that.
Nice try with your tangential history information though. Stay on topic next time![]()
False equivalency. For starters people have sued car companies for their responsibilities in injuries and deaths and have won. NRA won't allow that for guns. Secondly cars main purpose isn't to do body harm to others (for whatever reason), as capable as cars are of doing such. This is why the knife equivalency also fails.
And if cars and guns are the same, then the NRA should allow the CDC and other govt entities to deploy funding to study their impact on the country's health and other factors. They don't. Cars are heavily regulated in design and sale, and car owners are generally registered with the gov't. Hell I think even if a car is used off road it's still registered for property tax. So let's not play that equivalency game, because that will lead 2A advocates down a path they don't want to go down.
That thing that is referred to as a "quote"
Is a collection of words. Written by me in today's case
The words contain information
A question in today's case
If you missed it, that's cool but usually when you quote someone on here it means you're
Responding
To their
Words
(Mine was a question)
I see that this mechanism is lost on you, but some people use it to address one another.
Starts with reading the words you quote tho.
None of this works if we just quote random posts and reply with unrelated replies.
Tell me more about how everyoness trying to ban all the firearms...As an term assault style makes no sense and has no definition with regard to rifles. Any rifle can be an assault rifle, since the term was arbitrarily created.
2nd, the arms in the 2nd amendment are called arms for a reason, not muskets, so you are making a argument that isn't supported by the text.
As for guns not stopping violence, TRM Howard, Malcom X, and others spoke of the benefit of repelling attacks with firearms, so to claim that it didn't stop any violence is a lie that can be clearly disproven.
Nice try correcting you? Is that what you meant?

i'm a gun owner with national african american gun association
check this video out and there facebook page

Tell me more about how everyoness trying to ban all the firearms...![]()

Nope. People just say that to paint an extremist viewpoint, in hopes that you'll join the other extreme.Not right now, but in the long term, yeah.
Nope. People just say that to paint an extremist viewpoint, in hopes that you'll join the other extreme.
You can even see it in subtle wording in shyt that doesn't add up
NRA? Why even join the NRA just because you support gun ownership. They aren't the National Gun Association...theyre the National Rifle Association
Rifles
Gimme a break. NRA. More like KKK. But really it's the National Republican association in disguise
I wasnt talk in bout u in general. I was talk in bout the NRA sinister plansI didn't say anything about supporting the NRA. I said ultimately long term the plan is to ban all weapons.

That's why the argument can never be won. Gun nuts always talk about well "this could happen". So there's no way to argue against it.
The discussions should be about reducing the amounts of ALL guns. Legal and illegal.
This is actually something where I have hope for millennial and younger, because it seems we're pretty anti-gun across the board. Could lead to some significant legislation in 25+ years