King Flex back on Tucker Carlson for Round 2

HollowPoints2

Don Makaveli.
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Messages
4,678
Reputation
-4,135
Daps
5,594
Reppin
East Coast
:yeshrug: To me you just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist. The 2 words still mean the same thing to me.
A racist will tell you how they feel and not fukk with a black person at all ,however, a white supremacist has no problem having you over the house for dinner or giving you a ride somewhere they just believe they're superior to you because of their white skin which is 99.9% of white people.
 

satam55

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
45,976
Reputation
5,333
Daps
90,420
Reppin
DFW Metroplex
Can't lose when you mention white supremacy or white supremacist because 99.9% of whites believe they're superior to black people.

A racist is different than a white supremacist, learn the difference.

What's the difference? To me the only difference is that White Supremacist is more specific to who it's calling out.

A white supremacist is what most white people are, just looking out for white interests and playing down racism towards blacks. They just want to maintain their privilege(although they'll deny it when called out on it) and they fear black empowerment.

A racist gets more into calling blacks n****** and denying blacks jobs, denying blacks loans or not leasing to them simply because they "don't like n*****" supporting violence against blacks etc. etc.

So basically a racist is an exaggerated white supremacist.
:yeshrug: To me you just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist. The 2 words still mean the same thing to me.
A racist will tell you how they feel and not fukk with a black person at all ,however, a white supremacist has no problem having you over the house for dinner or giving you a ride somewhere they just believe they're superior to you because of their white skin which is 99.9% of white people.

You also just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist.

I don't know where y'all got those definitions from. I (& other posters TLR) use the definitions that Neely Fuller Jr. & the late Dr. Frances Cress Welsing uses (Which is also what Tariq uses), where they use "Racists" & "White Supremacists" interchangeably.
 
Last edited:

Savior

Superstar
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
4,946
Reputation
1,030
Daps
12,878
Reppin
#byrdgang
Tariq did win but he looks like a fool when he talks about macking. He literally had a platform for this for over 10 years and now he is denouncing it isn't a good look.

With that said, Tucker played the wrong angle on this one. But discrediting Tariq's creditibility, he ended up looking like a fool when Tariq asked what is he doing to end systematic white supremacy. Tucker, hold that L

I mean at the end of the day writing books about macking is clearly a hustle so who really gives a shyt if he says it was satire? There's bigger battles to be fought than defending books written for lames to pick up chicks :yeshrug:
 

Crayola Coyote

Superstar
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
27,180
Reputation
2,460
Daps
62,277
To the guys saying he should not have said the book was satire

Do you guys remeber when richard spence was on roland martin adressing the alt right throwing nazi salute

He said it was done in good fun and exuberance

THIS "Grab them by the p*ssy is just locker room talk" Trump and all these other white ppl like to down play what they said/ did in the past, so Tariq is doing the same. He mocking them. White folks never answer a straight question so why should Tariq answer their questions ether?
 

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,203
Reputation
13,837
Daps
171,268
Reppin
Pawgistan
make sure y'all go buy 30 copies of the art of mackin:troll:



My copy just arrived in the mail :ahh:

Rq5tT3wn.jpg


Yes indeed family :tariq:
 

Jammer22

All Star
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,544
Reputation
786
Daps
3,968
Ain't about c00ning. Tariq's only rebuttals are random analogies and screaming white supremacy without defining it in context. Tucker had that Mack Lessons rebuttal ready and had some Esquire quotes to cut down Tariq's "it was a satire book!" angle.

Tariq isn't ready for this stage of white supremacy. Analogies be damned, they know how to paint a picture by distorting facts. If they debate again Tucker will probably pull the card we all know that could end him but I wont post it and do Fox's work for them, but on a national level that card ends Tariq.

I don't remember him using an analogy to defend his tweet. He was mostly repeating the fact that he said Trump's appointed people from the alt-right.

And he's right.

See this is a net-benefit since it exposes who is who and the people ready to side with WS or suspect sympathizers.
 

desjardins

Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
18,867
Reputation
1,674
Daps
70,130
Reppin
Mustard Island
you know they pay right?


Yea I assume that's the only reason he going on there....which ain't a good thing.
Get Money I guess. The fact he keep going on the same dude show too make me think them two be giggling setting up his appearances knowing it's going get Tucker ratings and Tariq a check :scust:
 

Jammer22

All Star
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,544
Reputation
786
Daps
3,968
Problem is this isn't a fact.

Yes it is.

For the sake of convo, would you like suspected white supremacists as a better fit then?

I can say I'm using alt-right as an ideological term rather than the actual group Richard Spencer founded, but why should I as a black man seperate an enemy based on small differences like that? The ideology they share is dangerous to black folks period.

The people Trump has in his circle have displayed suspicious behavior, statements and actions.
 
Top