I_Got_Da_Burna
Superstar
Tariq should have told Tucker "I teach mean how to use their mouthpiece to get women so they wont resort to grabbing them by the puzzy." Boom.![]()

Tariq should have told Tucker "I teach mean how to use their mouthpiece to get women so they wont resort to grabbing them by the puzzy." Boom.![]()

He really is.fukker Carlson is a joke
A racist will tell you how they feel and not fukk with a black person at all ,however, a white supremacist has no problem having you over the house for dinner or giving you a ride somewhere they just believe they're superior to you because of their white skin which is 99.9% of white people.To me you just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist. The 2 words still mean the same thing to me.
Can't lose when you mention white supremacy or white supremacist because 99.9% of whites believe they're superior to black people.
A racist is different than a white supremacist, learn the difference.
What's the difference? To me the only difference is that White Supremacist is more specific to who it's calling out.
A white supremacist is what most white people are, just looking out for white interests and playing down racism towards blacks. They just want to maintain their privilege(although they'll deny it when called out on it) and they fear black empowerment.
A racist gets more into calling blacks n****** and denying blacks jobs, denying blacks loans or not leasing to them simply because they "don't like n*****" supporting violence against blacks etc. etc.
So basically a racist is an exaggerated white supremacist.
To me you just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist. The 2 words still mean the same thing to me.
A racist will tell you how they feel and not fukk with a black person at all ,however, a white supremacist has no problem having you over the house for dinner or giving you a ride somewhere they just believe they're superior to you because of their white skin which is 99.9% of white people.
Tariq did win but he looks like a fool when he talks about macking. He literally had a platform for this for over 10 years and now he is denouncing it isn't a good look.
With that said, Tucker played the wrong angle on this one. But discrediting Tariq's creditibility, he ended up looking like a fool when Tariq asked what is he doing to end systematic white supremacy. Tucker, hold that L

Tariq should have told Tucker "I teach mean how to use their mouthpiece to get women so they wont resort to grabbing them by the puzzy." Boom.![]()

To the guys saying he should not have said the book was satire
Do you guys remeber when richard spence was on roland martin adressing the alt right throwing nazi salute
He said it was done in good fun and exuberance

make sure y'all go buy 30 copies of the art of mackin

Ain't about c00ning. Tariq's only rebuttals are random analogies and screaming white supremacy without defining it in context. Tucker had that Mack Lessons rebuttal ready and had some Esquire quotes to cut down Tariq's "it was a satire book!" angle.
Tariq isn't ready for this stage of white supremacy. Analogies be damned, they know how to paint a picture by distorting facts. If they debate again Tucker will probably pull the card we all know that could end him but I wont post it and do Fox's work for them, but on a national level that card ends Tariq.
you know they pay right?

Problem is this isn't a fact.He was mostly repeating the fact that he said Trump's appointed people from the alt-right.
Problem is this isn't a fact.