on face value, if you are an ill-informed cac you'd think Tucker won
but when you go verify and check facts... Tariq destroyed Tucker again.This is getting laughable
What facts did you verify and check?
on face value, if you are an ill-informed cac you'd think Tucker won
but when you go verify and check facts... Tariq destroyed Tucker again.This is getting laughable
Those FoxNews guys let Megyn Kelly twist in the wind when she was getting bullied by Trump.Prior to Trump's election, the conservative media would be able to nail Tariq to the cross for his old stuff.
Not anymore, all Tariq has to do with mention all of the outlandish things Trump has said and did that they have brushed aside and supported in order to uphold White Supremacy. Fox has no type of moral grounds to stand on in arguments after Trump.





at the thought of Tucker reading Tariq's mackin books like 




Agreed. 100%I'm a Tariq fan but that macking shyt is haunting himthat book wasn't tongue in cheek let' be real.
Tariq did win but he looks like a fool when he talks about macking. He literally had a platform for this for over 10 years and now he is denouncing it isn't a good look.
With that said, Tucker played the wrong angle on this one. But discrediting Tariq's creditibility, he ended up looking like a fool when Tariq asked what is he doing to end systematic white supremacy. Tucker, hold that L
What you're missing is that if Tucker answered that question, he would have validated Tariq's claim that such a system exists, he continues to dismiss these claims because the true purpose of inviting Tariq on Fox is to incrementally paint him as a crackpot that blames everything on white people.
Tariq has a flaw in my opinion when it comes to dealing with white media. A couple flaws the more I think about it. One, unfortunately those womanizing books will always be his Achilles heel when engaging with Conservative media. In this day and age of non-thinkers and fast food information in the form of sound bites called talking points, his Mackin books make for a considerable red Herring.
Two, he comes off unprepared when engaging with Tucker Carlson. Like he's still learning the ropes of debating. A lot of umming and ughhing, lack of clarity, and a general sense of nervousness. Watch Tariq again and then watch the following and tell me which one would you rather have your back in conflict. I'll take Quanell.
Well, isn't that part of the problem, we have a system of white supremacy and their #1 rule is to deny it. Neely mentions this all the timeWhat you're missing is that if Tucker answered that question, he would have validated Tariq's claim that such a system exists, he continues to dismiss these claims because the true purpose of inviting Tariq on Fox is to incrementally paint him as a crackpot that blames everything on white people.
I noticed that during the first interview. These aren't debates in Tucker's mind. He just want to make Tariq look as silly as possible. It's nothing new. If he was looking for an actual debate he would have questioned the information given in Hidden Colors.What you're missing is that if Tucker answered that question, he would have validated Tariq's claim that such a system exists, he continues to dismiss these claims because the true purpose of inviting Tariq on Fox is to incrementally paint him as a crackpot that blames everything on white people.
Well, isn't that part of the problem, we have a system of white supremacy and their #1 rule is to deny it. Neely mentions this all the time
What facts did you verify and check?