THATS INCREDIBLE .. ANYONE SAYIN HE WOULDNT HAVE AT LEAST AN EXTRA 10 POINTS WITOUT SHAQ BEIN THERE IS LYIN TO THEYSELVES.

He averaged 40.6 that entire month, averaged 45.0 in his streak in January 2006 where he averaged 43.0 points, the only player other than him to do that was Wilt. why hasn't nobody did anything like that since then? How many nikkas with better % than Kobe ball hogged since 2003 or 2006?
He gets more than enough credit for his scoring ability, I don't know where that was ever questioned.
People like @Sccit are just very stupid and try to play out imaginary scenarios like Kobe was far above the rest and was just the unluckiest player of all time.

Kobe was an inefficient ballhog. Why is that impressive?
OH, OK.. SO THATS WHAT WE DEALIN WITH.
Because he was less efficient than his peers who he was regularly compared to. Overall, his efficiency numbers always placed him near the top of the league.y yall dudes acting like Kobe wasnt effiecient
Shaq wasn't there from 05 to 12 and he didn't average 40.
If Kobe could have averaged 40 he would've done it in 2006. As great as Kobe was he was never consistently great. He had off games were he would go 8 for 30 and end up with 18 or so points. That's why he is a 44% shooter for his career instead of a 50% one.
HOW CAN U BE INEFFICIENT WIT A CARRER TS% OF 55??
BRON GROUPIES ARE THE WORST
He had the ball more than any point guard did. He wasn't a Rip Hamilton out there. His assist numbers were low when you consider his usage rate. Look at the assist numbers of Wade, LeBron, Harden, or other non point guards who had a similar role.HIS ASSIST NUMBERS FOR A SHOOTING GUARD WERE EXCELLENT .. A GREAT PASSER IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD.
Yeah, because Kobestans are the ones who post empirically.
2004 - 2005
EC 21.5 ppg on 44.1 fg%
WC 25.1 ppg on 43.7 fg%
2005-2006
EC 36.1 ppg on 46.4 %
WC 35.0 ppg on 44.2.%
2006-2007
EC 29.0 on 45.0%
WC 32.9 on 46.1 %
2007-2008
EC 26.7 on 43.3 %
WC 29.3 on 45.1%
This myth that the Eastern COnference was easier to play against in that era is bullshyt. Even taking Kobe's 2005-2006 season, the 81 point game is the reason he scored higher overall. If you adjust that game down to 40, for example (less of an outlier) his PPG would have been 34.7 PPG.
Bottom line is, he was worse against the EC.
THATS BECAUSE WHEN U PLAY VS THE WEST, U PLAY THOSE TEAMS 4 TIMES, THUS GETTING TO KNOW YOUR OPPONENT, WHILE ONLY PLAYING EASTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS TWICE .. IF HE PLAYED IN THE EAST, HE'D KNOW THE EAST BETTER, THUS PLAYIN BETTER AGAINST THEM. BUT HE WASNT DROPPIN 81 ON NO WESTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS. 2006 WAS HIS GREATEST SCORING YEAR, AND HE WAS BETTER AGAINST THE EAST WHILE FACING THEM MUCH LESS. INCREDIBLE.
Because he was less efficient than his peers who he was regularly compared to. Overall, his efficiency numbers always placed him near the top of the league.
It was mostly swept under the rug because Kobe typically had much better teammates than his more efficient foes.

Why hasn't nobody did it since? Lebron & Wade had season where they scored 30.0 PPG with teams they had to lead. He'll lebron carried garbage to the finals in 07. Why hasn't nobody put up the #s kobe did with better efficiency? If it took kobe 100 shots then it should of only taken 20 shots for a player with better efficiency to do the same in less time, right?Kobe was an inefficient ballhog. Why is that impressive?
THE ONLY THING EFFICIENT IN BASKETBALL IS HOW MUCH U WIN .. ACCORDING TO INDIVIDUAL NUMBERS, STEPH CURRY IS WAY MORE "EFFICIENT" THAN KOBE, MJ, OR LEBRON
BUT WE UNDERSTAND THAT ITS THE ONLY THING U WEIRDOS HAVE TO FALL BACK ON.. ADVANCED STATS
![]()