KOBE WOULDA AVERAGED 40 PPG IN THIS STAT INFLATED ERA

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,172
Reputation
1,055
Daps
44,290
THATS INCREDIBLE .. ANYONE SAYIN HE WOULDNT HAVE AT LEAST AN EXTRA 10 POINTS WITOUT SHAQ BEIN THERE IS LYIN TO THEYSELVES.
:mjlol:

Shaq wasn't there from 05 to 12 and he didn't average 40.

If Kobe could have averaged 40 he would've done it in 2006. As great as Kobe was he was never consistently great. He had off games were he would go 8 for 30 and end up with 18 or so points. That's why he is a 44% shooter for his career instead of a 50% one.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,465
Reputation
590
Daps
16,191
He averaged 40.6 that entire month, averaged 45.0 in his streak in January 2006 where he averaged 43.0 points, the only player other than him to do that was Wilt. why hasn't nobody did anything like that since then? How many nikkas with better % than Kobe ball hogged since 2003 or 2006?

Kobe was an inefficient ballhog. Why is that impressive?
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
61,087
Reputation
-20,398
Daps
79,111
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
He gets more than enough credit for his scoring ability, I don't know where that was ever questioned.

People like @Sccit are just very stupid and try to play out imaginary scenarios like Kobe was far above the rest and was just the unluckiest player of all time.


YET PEOPLE WHO CALL HIS STREAK OF 9 CONSECUTIVE 40 POINT GAMES "GARBAGE" ARE SMART

:scust:
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,159
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,338
Reppin
Los Angeles
y yall dudes acting like Kobe wasnt effiecient
Because he was less efficient than his peers who he was regularly compared to. Overall, his efficiency numbers always placed him near the top of the league.

It was mostly swept under the rug because Kobe typically had much better teammates than his more efficient foes.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
61,087
Reputation
-20,398
Daps
79,111
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
:mjlol:

Shaq wasn't there from 05 to 12 and he didn't average 40.

If Kobe could have averaged 40 he would've done it in 2006. As great as Kobe was he was never consistently great. He had off games were he would go 8 for 30 and end up with 18 or so points. That's why he is a 44% shooter for his career instead of a 50% one.


NAAH.. HE'S A 45% SHOOTER ON HIS CAREER BECAUSE OF HIS LAST COUPLE OF SEASONS, WHICH WERE INDEED INEFFICIENT DUE TO HIS PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS. IN HIS PRIME, HE WAS TYPICALLY AROUND 46%, WHICH IS EXCELLENT FOR A SHOOTING GUARD IN HIS ERA, WHO WAS A SHOOT FIRST, DOUBLE-TRIPLE TEAMED, AND SHOT AS MANY PERIMETER SHOTS AS HE DID.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,465
Reputation
590
Daps
16,191
HOW CAN U BE INEFFICIENT WIT A CARRER TS% OF 55??

BRON GROUPIES ARE THE WORST

What's your baseline for efficiency? It's funny how kobestans fixate only on True Shooting %, which is an "advanced stat" but decry any other "advanced stat" that shows he was a high volume chucker.

I think kobe holds the record for most games with 40 or more shots with less than 50 points. He holds the record for most missed shots in a game, going 17-47. Against an EC team. In his prime.
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,159
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,338
Reppin
Los Angeles
HIS ASSIST NUMBERS FOR A SHOOTING GUARD WERE EXCELLENT .. A GREAT PASSER IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD.
He had the ball more than any point guard did. He wasn't a Rip Hamilton out there. His assist numbers were low when you consider his usage rate. Look at the assist numbers of Wade, LeBron, Harden, or other non point guards who had a similar role.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
61,087
Reputation
-20,398
Daps
79,111
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Yeah, because Kobestans are the ones who post empirically.

2004 - 2005
EC 21.5 ppg on 44.1 fg%
WC 25.1 ppg on 43.7 fg%

2005-2006

EC 36.1 ppg on 46.4 %
WC 35.0 ppg on 44.2.%


2006-2007

EC 29.0 on 45.0%
WC 32.9 on 46.1 %

2007-2008

EC 26.7 on 43.3 %
WC 29.3 on 45.1%



This myth that the Eastern COnference was easier to play against in that era is bullshyt. Even taking Kobe's 2005-2006 season, the 81 point game is the reason he scored higher overall. If you adjust that game down to 40, for example (less of an outlier) his PPG would have been 34.7 PPG.

Bottom line is, he was worse against the EC.

THATS BECAUSE WHEN U PLAY VS THE WEST, U PLAY THOSE TEAMS 4 TIMES, THUS GETTING TO KNOW YOUR OPPONENT, WHILE ONLY PLAYING EASTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS TWICE .. IF HE PLAYED IN THE EAST, HE'D KNOW THE EAST BETTER, THUS PLAYIN BETTER AGAINST THEM. BUT HE WASNT DROPPIN 81 ON NO WESTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS. 2006 WAS HIS GREATEST SCORING YEAR, AND HE WAS BETTER AGAINST THE EAST WHILE FACING THEM MUCH LESS. INCREDIBLE.
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,465
Reputation
590
Daps
16,191
THATS BECAUSE WHEN U PLAY VS THE WEST, U PLAY THOSE TEAMS 4 TIMES, THUS GETTING TO KNOW YOUR OPPONENT, WHILE ONLY PLAYING EASTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS TWICE .. IF HE PLAYED IN THE EAST, HE'D KNOW THE EAST BETTER, THUS PLAYIN BETTER AGAINST THEM. BUT HE WASNT DROPPIN 81 ON NO WESTERN CONFERENCE TEAMS. 2006 WAS HIS GREATEST SCORING YEAR, AND HE WAS BETTER AGAINST THE EAST WHILE FACING THEM MUCH LESS. INCREDIBLE.

Look at all the elite perimeter players in that era. They all did better against the West.
LMFAO at your childish explanation. You really can't engage in a discussion like this, Elinor. You lack the education and intelligence.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
61,087
Reputation
-20,398
Daps
79,111
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Because he was less efficient than his peers who he was regularly compared to. Overall, his efficiency numbers always placed him near the top of the league.

It was mostly swept under the rug because Kobe typically had much better teammates than his more efficient foes.


THE ONLY THING EFFICIENT IN BASKETBALL IS HOW MUCH U WIN .. ACCORDING TO INDIVIDUAL NUMBERS, STEPH CURRY IS WAY MORE "EFFICIENT" THAN KOBE, MJ, OR LEBRON

BUT WE UNDERSTAND THAT ITS THE ONLY THING U WEIRDOS HAVE TO FALL BACK ON.. ADVANCED STATS

:scust:
 

Jordan>>LeFrozen

It was written in the Bible
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
13,591
Reputation
859
Daps
49,321
Reppin
NYC
Kobe was an inefficient ballhog. Why is that impressive?
Why hasn't nobody did it since? Lebron & Wade had season where they scored 30.0 PPG with teams they had to lead. He'll lebron carried garbage to the finals in 07. Why hasn't nobody put up the #s kobe did with better efficiency? If it took kobe 100 shots then it should of only taken 20 shots for a player with better efficiency to do the same in less time, right?
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,465
Reputation
590
Daps
16,191
THE ONLY THING EFFICIENT IN BASKETBALL IS HOW MUCH U WIN .. ACCORDING TO INDIVIDUAL NUMBERS, STEPH CURRY IS WAY MORE "EFFICIENT" THAN KOBE, MJ, OR LEBRON

BUT WE UNDERSTAND THAT ITS THE ONLY THING U WEIRDOS HAVE TO FALL BACK ON.. ADVANCED STATS

:scust:

Again, Elinor, your lack of intelligence and education is galling. You rely solely on True Shooting, which is... AN ADVANCED STAT
 
Top