Kyrie lost

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

So it took two minutes of game clock for Kyrie to react to LeBron pointing?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Here you go with the bullshyt.
Boston and Cleveland's records have been earned through roughly 53-54 games to date, yes or no?

Yes, and what does that have to do with the argument?

 

[Shadow King]

Yes, and what does that have to do with the argument?

@Dwight Howard said Boston has enjoyed a superior record with an inferior roster...why is the Cavs roster that's been together for 1 game reflective of his argument that is based on a 53 game record?

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

I said athletically...if that go over your head youre being purposely obtuse

You clowns have no idea wtf you're talking about And Jaylen is 21 and Tatum is 20. Celts are fine. Cavs won't even have KANG next season

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

@Dwight Howard said Boston has enjoyed a superior record with an inferior roster...why is the Cavs roster that's been together for 1 game reflective of his argument that is based on a 53 game record?

I assume @Dwight Howard is speaking about the Celtics having an "inferior roster" prior to these moves (across the season in general) - which he would be correct on. @ba'al said "just a second ago they were arguing that the celtics were the best team all around in the east", which Dwight (I assume) wasn't basing his point on, because he believes the Celtics roster was inferior to what LeBron has been playing with this season.

So, here YOU go with this bullshyt.

 

[UpAndComing]

Cavs Bandwagon fans are lit in this thread

 

[Onigumo]

 

[Shadow King]

I assume @Dwight Howard is speaking about the Celtics having an "inferior roster" prior to these moves (across the season in general) - which he would be correct on. @ba'al said "just a second ago they were arguing that the celtics were the best team all around in the east", which Dwight (I assume) wasn't basing his point on, because he believes the Celtics roster was inferior to what LeBron has been playing with this season.

So, here YOU go with this bullshyt.

So you believe the previous Cavs roster with all the old, washed players were better than Boston roster from October 17?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

So you believe the previous Cavs roster with all the old, washed players were better than Boston roster from October 17?

They were better from the moment Hayward went down injured - yes. If you would've made a poll asking who has the better roster immediately following that Celtics/Cavs game, the consensus would be the Cavs.

 

[Eye Cue DA COLI GAWD]

Season series:

Cle 2 Bos 1

 

[Shadow King]

They were better from the moment Hayward went down injured - yes. If you would've made a poll asking who has the better roster immediately following that Celtics/Cavs game, the consensus would be the Cavs.

And from December onwards nothing like a 6-13 record since Christmas didn't prove otherwise? don't use the October 17 date to forgo the WHOLE time between then and now. The consensus has not been the same this entire time and you know that.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

And from December onwards nothing like a 6-13 record since Christmas didn't prove otherwise? don't use the October 17 date to forgo the WHOLE time between then and now? The consensus has not been the same this entire time and you know that.

See, now, you're making the mistake of looking at their respective records and not the talent/ability. Cavs had a better roster, the problem with them was a lack of coaching, system, effort, and execution, whereas the Celtics have been at the other end of the spectrum (it's half the reason why they've been the best defensive team this season, while being medicore on offense). All @Dwight Howard said was "inferior roster", he didn't mean anything about coaching/system and effort.

 

[Shadow King]

See, now, you're making the mistake of looking at their respective records and not the talent/ability. Cavs had a better roster, the problem with them was a lack of coaching, system, effort, and execution, whereas the Celtics have been at the other end of the spectrum (it's half the reason why they've been the best defensive team this season, while being medicore on offense). All @Dwight Howard said was "inferior roster", he didn't mean anything about coaching/system and effort.

I can't really say a roster of players who can score but can't and won't play any defense is better than one that can play defense and get hot or score enough in general to win.

But I do say often when the topic of coaching arises that Stevens is one of the best in the league...so fair enough

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

Smiley potential if you ask me

@3Rivers

 

[NYC Rebel]

The at the moment posting on this board is appalling