Smilie potential

Smilie potential

I don't see how you could argue that the problem with the Cavs defensive struggles were merely coaching related, and yet not expect to see an across-the-board improvement on the defense of every traded player.Crowder and Wade are likely to see an improvement in "defensive metrics" because they play on defensive-orientated teams.
And what would that prove exactly? I don't think you realize how this shyt works.
What is there to be "wrong" about? You're acting like I'm making a prediction or something, I'm simply relaying common knowledge. There's nothing to be right/wrong about. I have no problem with admitting to being wrong, the problem is, a lot of folks don't seem to understand that I'm reasonable, and my takes are grounded in reality - I don't say dumb shyt that has a high probability of backfiring.

Are nikkas saying the Celts roster was ever better than the cavs roster before or after the trade? No one thought they would have their record when Hayward got hurt..matter of fact everyone thought Kyrie would crash and burn without Bron. Cavs were always the east favorites before they stated playing like dog shyt on defense. Now all of a sudden their roster was inferior to the Celtics roster becasue of record? Posters on this site full of shyt. No one in their right mind said celts had a better roster than the cavs before the first game was played this season. I've been saying Celts are over achieving with their roster talent compared to other teams.
It wasn't just coach-related (in terms of game-planning/system), but it was effort-related as well, from the top of the roster down to the bottom. The problem with expecting to see an "across-the-board improvement" on defense to prove the fact, is that those players could go to equal or worse environments that don't put any emphasis on effort or strategy when it comes to defense. There are many factors when you look at defensive metrics where you can't just draw a direct and specific conclusion, especially for players who aren't defensive anchors.I don't see how you could argue that the problem with the Cavs defensive struggles were merely coaching related, and yet not expect to see an across-the-board improvement on the defense of every traded player.
Nah, because again, it wouldn't be weighed against the same teammates, lineups and opposition played. Neither would it take into account players like LeBron and TT showing minimal effort on defense prior to these moves, to showing A LOT more effort on defense post-these moves. Anyone that's objective and has watched a genuine amount of Cavs games would tell you that there's been a change in some of their players' defensive efforts in wake of these trade moves.It would also figure that the current crop of new Cavaliers would see a regression in their defensive output.
I think it's probably best if you stop talking about hoops, altogether.I'm certain you're going to argue it's of no consequence...basically to deny that premise, though.
We all know your M.O. here.
![]()

nikkas forgot the Cavs got smacked up last time they played?
"Ol that's different" ass nikkas
It wasn't just coach-related (in terms of game-planning/system), but it was effort-related as well, from the top of the roster down to the bottom. The problem with expecting to see an "across-the-board improvement" on defense to prove the fact, is that those players could go to equal or worse environments that don't put any emphasis on effort or strategy when it comes to defense. There are many factors when you look at defensive metrics where you can't just draw a direct and specific conclusion, especially for players who aren't defensive anchors.
Like I said, I don't think you understand how this works.
Nah, because again, it wouldn't be weighed against the same teammates, lineups and opposition played. Neither would it take into account players like LeBron and TT actively not playing defense prior to these moves, to showing more effort on defense post-these moves. Anyone that's objective and has watched a genuine amount of Cavs games would tell you that there's been a change in some of their players' defensive efforts in wake of these trade moves.
I think it's probably best if you stop talking about hoops, altogether.
![]()

And you're just another rockbrain who's incapable of applying context to stats.Except that the Cavs had/have the worst defensive ratings in the league.
Once again the only premise that matters is the only one that Gil Scott Heroin says matters.
We know how you function bro.
![]()

Another Gil Scott Heroin MO brehs...And you're just another rockbrain who's incapable of applying context to stats.
![]()
I'm surprised this cornball is even posting anymore after all the dumb shyt he said about the Eagles....

Emotionally he's about 12 years old for the rest of his life. Great at counting toothpicks, though.
You really in your feelings breh.
Grow up.



Gil Scott already laying the groundwork for when Bron eliminates Kyrie.
Been talking shyt for months but is suddenly copping pre-emptive pleas now that he sees the writing on the wall.
Cavs are suddenly the 96 Bulls because rhey acquired a bunch of bench players & George Hill.![]()
It's highly unlikely the Celtics will make it into the Finals; not enough offensive firepower and far too inexperienced to win THREE playoff series' in a row. They're probably another 1-2 seasons away from making that leap.
I expect the Cavs to beat the Celtics if they matchup in the playoffs. It still doesn't take away from the fact that what you wrote was trash.
![]()
Celtics are at least one year away. They simply don't have the offensive firepower and experience with Hayward injured + a bunch of young dudes who're still developing their craft. Teams like the Raptors, Wizards, even an argument can be made for the Heat, are in a better position for the postseason. I mentioned it a couple months ago, but the Cavs' problem won't be being unable to beat any one of those teams, it'll be trying to beat three of those teams in succession. Will their Larry Holmes state and lack of athleticism be able to withstand attrition warfare playing a mix of the Pacers, Pistons, Celtics, Wizards, Bucks, Heat and Raptors?
I wouldn't even be surprised if this Celtics squad lost in the first round.
![]()
Very few people believe that. The Celtics simply don't have enough offense and experience to beat the Cavs in a series.
I fear their inexperience will be their undoing in the postseason. They're at least one season away.
*puts hand up*
Raptors have the best overall team in the East.
![]()
I find it hilarious since YOU know I've spoken multiple times on how the loss of Hayward and the youth of this Celtics team will be obstacles that they won't be able to overcome, because YOU called me out on it. And now you're accusing me of the very opposite. Make up your cotdamn mind and stick to your story.Y'all have more experience and better top-end talent (which matters most in the playoffs). The Celtics have a bunch of players who're in their early 20s, and who've little postseason experience. Wall, Beal and Otto are amongst the best 1-3 combos in the league. Celtics are missing their co-offensive anchor and are still 1-2 seasons away from being ready.
The Wizards are basically in the same boat the Raptors are in.
