Because these guys aren't Lakers fans. They are Kobe stans. They have adopted his same parasitic attitude not understanding toxic leadership destroys organizations. They don't understand Dwight or any other person will never measure up to Kobes obsession with winning. Only other person who matches that type of will is MJ. Even during the repeat there were questions about Shaq's focus.who the fcku questions multiple finals mvp's focus. A toxic leader does that. They don't realize this brand of leadership is an anomaly. You could say today that Lebron, Tim and other great players aren't nearly as toxic to their teammates and organization as Kobe is and they've won rings. In Tim's case multiple.
This leader happens to have been great. Most toxic leaders aren't great. They are just in a position where there is poor oversight. Kobe was great but he's on his last legs. Lakers will come to a crossroad like they did with Shaq. Keep an aging star or go for the younger, hungrier talent. If they choose Kobe, smush parker years are ahead of them. This organization will experience a dark future. If they choose Dwight they have a future. But they won't choose Dwight because they are at the point where their leader is toxic and not great while having poor oversight from upper management.
![]()
In 2014 the Lakers will basically only have Howard ($22m) and Nash ($9.7m) assuming they dont re-sign any of their other players from 2013/2014. The Lakers could then add another star ($19m) as a FA but then it gets tough. Since there are less than 12 players signed, nine times the rookie minimum for $4.5m total is added to the count for cap calculation. That adds to $22m + $9.7m + $19m + $4.5m = $55.2m already counted on a $58m salary cap.
What do you have to offer to get that third star? The Lakers would have no trade ability since they wouldn't have players to trade and any new players would have to come from FA, the draft, minimum salaries, or exceptions. The best they would really have to offer a FA is an MLE of $5m.
In 2015 the Lakers would have Howard ($24m) and their new star ($21m) assuming they don't re-sign anybody else again. Add that rookie minimum for ten for $5m and the total is $50m on a probable cap of $60m. Then what do they offer to get that third star? Is $10m enough? Even then if they do get one, it is 2 stars, a middle star, and minimums at best for the fill ins.
If the Lakers want to get a third superstar, somebody is going to have to take a big pay cut.
The only other way the Lakers can use their extra spending power is by using it on the players they already have in 2013 and extending them ... such as for Gasol, Kobe, MWP and so on.