The news reports does give a real account of what happened.
"On Sunday afternoon, Garces and his brother used a drill to force open the door and enter the victim’s house without permission to retrieve his belongings, according to the landlord’s family.
Garces owed $200 for his second month’s rent for his room in the home but was refusing to pay up, according to the landlord’ family."
This dude was not renting the whole unit, he was renting a room in the house that the old man STILL lived in. He was kicked out for not paying rent and BROKE IN with a power drill.
I dont know why yall keep arguing like the old man was just some grimy landlord harassing his tenants, the old man was also a resident of that address.
stop.
stop.
stop.
stop.
the video showed the encounter.
in typical counter engagements.
if you were thwarted from an attempt.
then regather and attempt another attempt.
you are now an aggressor.
whom is not defending yourself.
a barrier was put between the landlord and the tenant forcibly.
we see this on film.
that force closing of an entry way.
shows the sign of an encounter.
that could be shown as self defense.
or an act of forcible aggression.
plus shows a complete violation of civil good faith from the landlord.
plus that good faith lack of action lead to a counter.
as the landlord is on film visibly in a state of emotion.
not as a cognitive good fsith based landowner, and landlord.
his filmed encounter is on film and shows this.
his Initial aggression on film.
when the tenant forcibly shuts the entryway.
is seen and shows him lacking civility and good faith.
as a businessman/landlord/landowner.
that closed out that first engagement.
after that engagement.
the landlord now created a new encounter.
when the barrier was shut.
he then tried to forcibly enter the area and entryway of the past encounter as an aggressor.
the landlord never excercised his rights..
then turned into a vigilante and aggressor after a civil dispute.
he was countered in one engagement..
to close out another engagement,...
he is not the police.
he can not act as an aggressor. After a encounter has taken place.
unless put under duress. Where forced by an aggressor to defend himself in an additional encounter.
in this situation. The landlord pursued after the civil dispute..plus after became an aggressor and tried forcible entry.
when all the landlord should have done was follow asset forfeiture counter measures legally.
he never should have engaged the tenant.
especially in a winter seasonal time period.
as there are national laws against eviction.
that are made to elaborate and eliminate this type of dispute.
from being and occurring in the future of real estate, and housing socially and economically.
art barr