G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
they dont.. its why many player throw themselves on the ground to pretend they got hit...d.rose didntHave you watched basketball in the last 3 years
LeBron Back Rocking the 2XL Headband - Wolves vs. Lakers
- Thread starter goatmane
- Start date
Have you watched basketball in the last 3 years
There have been a LOT of bullshyt foul calls on jump shots the last three years, especially when Harden or Steph were involved. This whole "calling fouls on incidental contact on jump shots" thing is unprecedented, and it doesn't fit the rule book.
I just pulled receipts. It's a bad call. The fact that other bad calls are made doesn't somehow make it the right call. That's like saying that people should get calls whenever they flop cause you seen a lot of people get calls when they flop.
The God Poster
LWO representa
So a bad follow through can't effect your shot
Also I believe the rules even state the ball is apart of the hand.
There have been a LOT of bullshyt foul calls on jump shots the last three years, especially when Harden or Steph were involved. This whole "calling fouls on incidental contact on jump shots" thing is unprecedented, and it doesn't fit the rule book.
I just pulled receipts. It's a bad call. The fact that other bad calls are made doesn't somehow make it the right call. That's like saying that people should get calls whenever they flop cause you seen a lot of people get calls when they flop.
You can't touch a player on offense anymore or hinder their progress on either a drive or a jumper
Rules are rules
Just admit you were thirsty for a win so the lakers don't end up with 10 wins on the season
Yep, rules are rules, and the rulebook says explicitly:
You can't touch a player on offense anymore or hinder their progress on either a drive or a jumper
Rules are rules
Just admit you were thirsty for a win so the lakers don't end up with 10 wins on the season
After the shooter releases the ball: Contact with the shooter’s hand (a “high five”) during the shooter’s followthru is legal, provided that the contact is incidental and not, for example, hostile or overly physical.
https://turnernbahangtime.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/point-of-contact.pdf
And I'm not a Laker fan, I don't give a shyt if the lakers only get 10 wins this season, this team ain't have a chance of winning anything meaningful right now.
No, getting hit on the follow through can NOT effect your shot unless you sense it coming, The ball is gone. This is basic physics.So a bad follow through can't effect your shot
Also I believe the rules even state the ball is apart of the hand.
The only reason coaches tell you to follow-through in sports is because they're afraid that if you drop form early, then it might cause you to accidentally falter in form before the ball is released/struck. It's a mental thing. But hitting someone after the ball is released can NOT physically affect the shot unless you know you're gonna get hit before you release.
And the ball is a part of the hand so long as its in contact with the ball. But high-five contact after the release of the ball ain't no foul either.
THIS ONLY APPLIES IF THE HIGH FIVE/CONTACT
HAPPENS AFTER THE SHOOTER HAS LANDED.
IF THE SHOOTER IS STILL AIRBORNE
WHEN CONTACT HAPPENS
ITS A FOUL.
THE PROCESS OF THE SHOT
DOESNT END UNTIL THE SHOOTER LANDS.
THIS ONLY APPLIES IF THE HIGH FIVE/CONTACT
HAPPENS AFTER THE SHOOTER HAS LANDED.
IF THE SHOOTER IS STILL AIRBORNE
WHEN CONTACT HAPPENS
ITS A FOUL.
THE PROCESS OF THE SHOT
DOESNT END UNTIL THE SHOOTER LANDS.
Receipts? I've never seen that in the rulebook anywhere. It doesn't matter what's happening with the "process of the shot" if the contact is clean on the hand.
NAH ITS IN THE SAME VEIN AS NOT GIVING A SHOOTER SPACE TO LAND
EVEN THOUGH THE BALL IS LONG GONE.
NO CONTACT CAN BE MADE UNTIL THE SHOOTER
LANDS SAFELY.
YOUVE SEEN THE HAND CONTACT
REFFED LIKE THIS A MILLION TIMES
BUT YOURE SAYING THOSE WERE BAD CALLS
EVEN THOUGH THEYRE CLEARLY THE NORM.
NAH ITS IN THE SAME VEIN AS NOT GIVING A SHOOTER SPACE TO LAND
EVEN THOUGH THE BALL IS LONG GONE.
NO CONTACT CAN BE MADE UNTIL THE SHOOTER
LANDS SAFELY.
YOUVE SEEN THE HAND CONTACT
REFFED LIKE THIS A MILLION TIMES
BUT YOURE SAYING THOSE WERE BAD CALLS
EVEN THOUGH THEYRE CLEARLY THE NORM.
Make up rules that aren't in the rulebook brehs.
And damn near EVERY shot close to the rim has contact before the shooter hits the ground. Again, privileging jump shooters like that is just dumb.
And no, pointing out there were other bad calls doesn't mean you should make an extreme example of that bad call when the game on the line. That's like begging to get a call on a flop just because Harden is constantly flopping the last three years.
THE RULEBOOK SAYS YOUR ARM IS SUPPOSED TO VERTICAL
WHEN DEFENDING A SHOT
AND ANY CONTACT MADE WHEN YOUR ARM
IS EXTENDED IS A FOUL.
YOU CANT REACH IN A SHOOTERS PERSONAL
SPACE AND MAKE CONTACT
THATS WHY PPL DONT GO FOR BLOCKS
ON MOST JUMPSHOTS.
Make up rules that aren't in the rulebook brehs.
And damn near EVERY shot close to the rim has contact before the shooter hits the ground. Again, privileging jump shooters like that is just dumb.
And no, pointing out there were other bad calls doesn't mean you should make an extreme example of that bad call when the game on the line. That's like begging to get a call on a flop just because Harden is constantly flopping the last three years.
THE NBA HAS PUBLICLY STATED
MANY TIMES
THEY PUT MORE & MORE EMPHASIS ON PROTECTING JUMP SHOOTERS.
YOURE COMPLETELY IGNORING REALITY
TO FIT AN AGENDA.
Colejeezy
Rest In Peace KOBE
The ability to get away with blatant fouls?
Bilz
Superstar
I agree that those types of fouls are pretty weak but if the tables are turned and that's Towns flying out and hitting Kuzma on a game winning attempt, that whistle is blowing 100 out of 100 times.
Nah. There can be some pretty big pro-Laker bias in big spots, but that would be a really, really weak call to make on a game-winner. I don't think anyone getting that call more than 10 out of 100 times, and I can't even think of what the 10 times would be.
Bilz
Superstar
I just can't really remember any times that a laker didn't get a close call at the end of a game
