LeBron Strikes Back: 'Rings Not Everything'

Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,601
Reputation
-17,816
Daps
84,274
Reppin
NULL
Now, Peyton can't be mentioned in the same breath as Montana because he only won one SB. :mindblown: I bet you think Marino can't be mentioned in the same breath as Trent fukking Dilfer, either. You know what...

another strawman argument....I clearly said that when talking about the greatest players RINGS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE

Tom Brady will always be better than Peyton regardless of how many MVPs Peyton got because Tom gots more superbowls. They are both in the echeleon as players and when we're at that stratosphere, rings make the difference.

Its the reason Dan Marino can't be considered better than Montana no matter how many more TDs he's passed for. Winning defines greatness and dudes who lead their teams to titles will ALWAYS be considered the best.

Why else does every all-time great choose Russell over Wilt eventhough Wilt dominated the game statistically? Great players are judged by whether they lead their teams to titles first and foremost. That is a reality for elite QBs and its a reality for elite basketball players.
 

holidayinn21

:SmugMoneyMike:
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,102
Reputation
2,446
Daps
55,127
Reppin
The mutha****in BX
:jawalrus:
Also if rings aren't everything, why did he go to Miami? Bron's decision to join up with wade and bosh should've put the whole "ring" discussion to bed for good. He knows how important they are or he would've never left

Plus, I can't believe nikkaz still using the Robert Horry argument.

i see this question has been avoided.
 

luckyse7enz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
41,930
Reputation
7,420
Daps
121,629
Reppin
Detroit/Los Angeles
rings do matter at the upper echelon top 1%

Here's what I believe and maybe some will agree...

Rings aren't the end-all, be-all when it comes to greatness.

Kareem has as many rings as Jordan AND he actually has more MVP awards. Kareem is also the NBA's all-time leading scorer

However, Jordan has 6 Finals MVP's and Kareem has 2. :mjpls:

The end-all, be-all should be the FINALS MVP awards that came with those rings.

This is why I believe that if Kobe were to win 6 or 7, he wouldn't be better than Jordan because while getting his current 5 rings, he was only the Finals MVP for 2 of them. Shaq has the other 3.

If LeBron were to win 2 more championships and 2 more Finals MVP awards, then (in my eyes), he'd be better than Kobe, hands-down. Rings are one thing but if you're a superstar, they shouldn't count in the argument unless you were the defined leader of that squad. That's just me... :yeshrug:

Also, why doesn't Phil Jackson ever come up in the LeBron/Kobe/Jordan debate? ...or at least when discussing Kobe. :ohhh:

LeBron took teams to the Finals with Mike Brown as his coach :whoo: and won it all with Erik Spoelstra coaching. Any credit for that or nah? :ld:
 

Kobes Two Jerseys

8 or 24 best player of the era
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
9,462
Reputation
1,350
Daps
23,923
Reppin
Fistful of jewels
Here's what I believe and maybe some will agree...

Rings aren't the end-all, be-all when it comes to greatness.

Kareem has as many rings as Jordan AND he actually has more MVP awards. Kareem is also the NBA's all-time leading scorer

However, Jordan has 6 Finals MVP's and Kareem has 2. :mjpls:

The end-all, be-all should be the FINALS MVP awards that came with those rings.

This is why I believe that if Kobe were to win 6 or 7, he wouldn't be better than Jordan because while getting his current 5 rings, he was only the Finals MVP for 2 of them. Shaq has the other 3.

If LeBron were to win 2 more championships and 2 more Finals MVP awards, then (in my eyes), he'd be better than Kobe, hands-down. Rings are one thing but if you're a superstar, they shouldn't count in the argument unless you were the defined leader of that squad. That's just me... :yeshrug:

Also, why doesn't Phil Jackson ever come up in the LeBron/Kobe/Jordan debate? ...or at least when discussing Kobe. :ohhh:

LeBron took teams to the Finals with Mike Brown as his coach :whoo: and won it all with Erik Spoelstra coaching. Any credit for that or nah? :ld:

If the end all be all is FMVP, then the goat is Bill Russell.

Bill Russell NBA Finals Most Valuable Player Award - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

H.J.Duck

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,987
Reputation
960
Daps
13,598
after watching the video, the article made Bron sound a lot more hurt/annoyed than he actually was...
 

Kobes Two Jerseys

8 or 24 best player of the era
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
9,462
Reputation
1,350
Daps
23,923
Reppin
Fistful of jewels
16909_10151495714892223_1792089348_n.jpg
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,173
Reputation
10,360
Daps
225,571
I love when this topic comes up because the people who always put emphasis on rings always will put Jordan over Bron, but once MFs start bringin up Bill Russells 11 rings, those same Jordan supporters start backtrackin, studdering, makin excuses, quantifying and moonwalkin around their own "ring logic" If rings meant everything, why don't we consider Bill russell the greatest of all time?
 

Kobes Two Jerseys

8 or 24 best player of the era
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
9,462
Reputation
1,350
Daps
23,923
Reppin
Fistful of jewels
I love when this topic comes up because the people who always put emphasis on rings always will put Jordan over Bron, but once MFs start bringin up Bill Russells 11 rings, those same Jordan supporters start backtrackin, studdering, makin excuses, quantifying and moonwalkin around their own "ring logic" If rings meant everything, why don't we consider Bill russell the greatest of all time?

Some people do.
 
Top