YoungMoneyCashMoneyBoy
Superstar
It's your point though.I don't care about the 60s or 70s. That's a
Useless point.
It's your point though.I don't care about the 60s or 70s. That's a
Useless point.
No. My point is on what I saw (80 & 90s)It's your point though.
No. My point is on what I saw.
Your point is to datamine on shyt you didn't see and think I should act like you.
I speak on experience. I also know NBA players who've said the same thing.Your "point" is on what you saw and basing that on expansion teams being the cause for what you saw.
No data mining necessary. Just an application of your reasoning, which is posted right in this thread. Far from data mining.
No one is asking you to apply it to an era you didn't see. I'm just pointing out how your reasoning could apply to other eras, which shows how faulty is.I speak on experience. I also know NBA players who've said the same thing.
Applying that reasoning to an era I didn't see makes no point and is just taking up real estate in here and making you feel as if you've brought value
Yes you are. So applying something to other eras shows something is faulty considering we can't speak on those eras since we didn't watch them?No one is asking you to apply it to an era you didn't see. I'm just pointing out how your reasoning could apply to other eras, which shows how faulty is.
If you ranked the 11 finals teams they faced (before heading into the finals) i would rank them like this
1. 96 Sonics
2. 07 Spurs
3. 97 Jazz
4. 93 Suns
5. 92 Blazers
6. 14 Spurs
7. 13 Spurs
8. 98 Jazz
9. 2011 Mavs
10. 2012 OKC
11. 91 Lakers (a miracle magic got them to the finals)
Inconsistent ass Kevin Duckworth who was already flabby and sick in his prime.Lots and lots of problems with this list, but I just can't imagine under what scenario you could rank the 92 Blazers over the 2013/2014 Spurs. Do you seriously think the Blazers would take the Spurs in a series?
That Blazer team went 10-50 from three over 6 games in the Finals, and their greatest interior scoring threat was....? Spurs would pack the paint and the Blazers would be shooting contested mid-range jumpers all game long.
And defensively they were average or worse at every position. Spurs would have just picked them apart.
Not to mention the coaching gap.
I don't see how you could consider that Blazer team even close. Come up, your #5 Blazer team was the exact same team that lost to your #11 Laker team in the WCF the previous year.
edit: Okay, one more. Disrespecting that 2012 OKC team, a team that had the MVP runner-up Kevin Durant, the #8 MVP vote-getter Russell Westbrook, the DPOY runner-up Serge Ibaka, and the 6th Man of the Year James Harden all healthy and on the same team?

No, I'm just responding to you.Yes you are. So applying something to other eras shows something is faulty considering we can't speak on those eras since we didn't watch them?
Dog...ur just taking to talk.
Inconsistent ass Kevin Duckworth who was already flabby and sick in his prime.![]()


If you ranked the 11 finals teams they faced (before heading into the finals) i would rank them like this
1. 96 Sonics
2. 07 Spurs
3. 97 Jazz
4. 93 Suns
5. 92 Blazers
6. 14 Spurs
7. 13 Spurs
8. 98 Jazz
9. 2011 Mavs
10. 2012 OKC
11. 91 Lakers (a miracle magic got them to the finals)
at having the 07 spurs at #2..:wtf.
(fukk you stu jackson)
Only one team LBJ faced in the top 5If you ranked the 11 finals teams they faced (before heading into the finals) i would rank them like this
1. 96 Sonics
2. 07 Spurs
3. 97 Jazz
4. 93 Suns
5. 92 Blazers
6. 14 Spurs
7. 13 Spurs
8. 98 Jazz
9. 2011 Mavs
10. 2012 OKC
11. 91 Lakers (a miracle magic got them to the finals)



Only one team LBJ faced in the top 5
And still took them L's
While MJ... well yall already know what happened there![]()
