Lol nukes don't exist......

Dwolf

Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
35,577
Reputation
9,585
Daps
107,266
Reppin
Murim
Japan is a conquered Nation who got their constitution written for them by their enemies lmao

The reality is the fire bombs of Japan caused way more death and destruction than the Two Nuclear Bombs combined lmao

2015-08-06T031116Z_1427972238_GF20000014870_RTRMADP_3_WW2-ANNIVERSARY-JAPAN-HIROSHIMA_0.JPG


planet and wild life in modern day hiroshima lmao

there is no radioactivity in Hiroshima lmao

People really do have a case, there's no proof nuclear bombs are real

Japan didn't even surrender because of any bomb, Russia was invading from the other side and they couldn't hold of both forces so they surrendered

their plan was to keep fighting on the ground until a stalemate was declared, but Russia advancing made that an impossibility for them
:whoa:
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,513
Reputation
6,155
Daps
107,534
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
Japan is a conquered Nation who got their constitution written for them by their enemies lmao

The reality is the fire bombs of Japan caused way more death and destruction than the Two Nuclear Bombs combined lmao

2015-08-06T031116Z_1427972238_GF20000014870_RTRMADP_3_WW2-ANNIVERSARY-JAPAN-HIROSHIMA_0.JPG


planet and wild life in modern day hiroshima lmao

there is no radioactivity in Hiroshima lmao

People really do have a case, there's no proof nuclear bombs are real


Japan didn't even surrender because of any bomb, Russia was invading from the other side and they couldn't hold of both forces so they surrendered

their plan was to keep fighting on the ground until a stalemate was declared, but Russia advancing made that an impossibility for them

Not sure if really stupid, or don't know how to use google.

http://gizmodo.com/why-can-people-live-in-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-now-but-1451250877
.rerf.or.jp/general/qa_e/qa12.html

Are Hiroshima and Nagasaki still radioactive?
qa_a.jpg
12

The practical answer is, "No."

There are two ways residual radioactivity is produced from an atomic blast. The first is due to fallout of the fission products or the nuclear material itself--uranium or plutonium (uranium was used for the Hiroshima bomb whereas plutonium was used for the Nagasaki bomb)--that contaminate the ground. Similar ground contamination occurred as a consequence of the Chernobyl accident, but on a much larger scale (click here for more-detailed explanation). The second way residual radioactivity is produced is by neutron irradiation of soil or buildings (neutron activation), causing non-radioactive materials to become radioactive.

Fallout. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs exploded at altitudes of 600 meters and 503 meters, respectively, then formed huge fireballs that rose with the ascending air currents. About 10% of the nuclear material in the bombs underwent fission; the remaining 90% rose in the stratosphere with the fireball.

Subsequently, the material cooled down and some of it started to fall with rain (black rain) in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki areas, but probably most of the remaining uranium or plutonium was dispersed widely in the atmosphere. Because of the wind, the rain did not fall directly on the hypocenters but rather in the west region (Koi, Takasu area) of Hiroshima and the eastern region (Nishiyama area) of Nagasaki.

The maximum estimates of dose due to fallout are 0.006-0.02 Gy in Hiroshima and 0.12-0.24 Gy in Nagasaki.* The corresponding doses at the hypocenters are believed to be only about 1/6 of these values.

Nowadays, the radioactivity is so miniscule that it is difficult to distinguish from trace amounts (including plutonium) of radioactivity caused by worldwide fallout from atmospheric (as opposed to underground) atomic-bomb tests that were conducted around the world in past decades, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
26,672
Reputation
9,022
Daps
114,639
I'm saying based upon raw evidence, that shyts sci-fi fantasy bullshyt

Same with the globe

People swear up and down the shyts round...but no one on the planet has or will ever see any type of curvature

All matrix programming



All I got to say to that is...

:sas1:



































Pull up

:sas2:
 

Adidacs

All Star
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
4,633
Reputation
-1,640
Daps
12,008
japan was firebombed and they blew up toy models in some "tests"

nukes exist now though
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,301
Daps
60,653
Reppin
NULL
Not sure if really stupid, or don't know how to use google.

http://gizmodo.com/why-can-people-live-in-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-now-but-1451250877
.rerf.or.jp/general/qa_e/qa12.html

Are Hiroshima and Nagasaki still radioactive?
qa_a.jpg
12

The practical answer is, "No."

There are two ways residual radioactivity is produced from an atomic blast. The first is due to fallout of the fission products or the nuclear material itself--uranium or plutonium (uranium was used for the Hiroshima bomb whereas plutonium was used for the Nagasaki bomb)--that contaminate the ground. Similar ground contamination occurred as a consequence of the Chernobyl accident, but on a much larger scale (click here for more-detailed explanation). The second way residual radioactivity is produced is by neutron irradiation of soil or buildings (neutron activation), causing non-radioactive materials to become radioactive.

Fallout. The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs exploded at altitudes of 600 meters and 503 meters, respectively, then formed huge fireballs that rose with the ascending air currents. About 10% of the nuclear material in the bombs underwent fission; the remaining 90% rose in the stratosphere with the fireball.

Subsequently, the material cooled down and some of it started to fall with rain (black rain) in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki areas, but probably most of the remaining uranium or plutonium was dispersed widely in the atmosphere. Because of the wind, the rain did not fall directly on the hypocenters but rather in the west region (Koi, Takasu area) of Hiroshima and the eastern region (Nishiyama area) of Nagasaki.

The maximum estimates of dose due to fallout are 0.006-0.02 Gy in Hiroshima and 0.12-0.24 Gy in Nagasaki.* The corresponding doses at the hypocenters are believed to be only about 1/6 of these values.

Nowadays, the radioactivity is so miniscule that it is difficult to distinguish from trace amounts (including plutonium) of radioactivity caused by worldwide fallout from atmospheric (as opposed to underground) atomic-bomb tests that were conducted around the world in past decades, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s.

You're calling me stupid, but your posting words from a source thats not you

Everything in this article could be complete shyt for all I know

all I said was there's no proof they do exists, you can come up with an excuse for anything lmao

the reality is, you don't know shyt, that's why you have to believe what is told to you

you can't accept that, you have zero expertise in anything and can't comprehend any of this shyt in this article for you to even know if it makes sense

I asked for proof and you posted somebody's words, that's not proof lmao

I can use google and post some words of somebody using scientific jargon that says the exact opposite and supports nukes being fake, and you would just call it bullshyt

so whats the difference, at the end of the day until somebody drops on these muthafukkaz you don't know
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
26,672
Reputation
9,022
Daps
114,639
next thing these nikkas are going to say radiation doesnt exist

i know for a fact most of you nikkas dont have girls in real life because who would put up with that nutty shyt yall be on

:dead:


Always something new with some of these dudes. We living in a coli world filled with flat earthers, pizza gaters, hollow earth peeps, and nikkas who don't believe dinosaurs ever existed.
 
Top