I absolutely disagree with this as a person who has been able to see it up and close from different avenues and programs that are used to assist the homeless.
Temporary homelessness shouldn’t even be in the same category to me because those folks are usually active in trying to better their situation. If they are applying themselves and the programs are available, it’s a good chance they get out of being homeless but the vast majority that I’ve seen, have taken it on as lifestyle for whatever reason.
What you're saying is contrary to every single social service agency, federal and state jobs programs, every homeless shelter director, the entirety of the US federal and state government housing trend tracking, and every single research study since the early 1900s about transient housing.
The vast majority of people who are homeless on any given day in the US are "temporarily homeless."
Only a small number of people are homeless for longer than a few months at a time.
I GRA for a think-tank that tracks housing outcomes for young women in the state and provides both research and legislation for housing - there is no place on the planet where the majority of the homeless are "taking it on as a lifestyle."
You can't be this naive. Them nikkas ain't pooling shyt, the cities spend the money to buy them one-way bus tickets to CA.
Some of y'all got a hard time admitting when you don't know what you're talking about.