McGrady on Curry unanimous MVP "It just tells you how watered down our league is"

Do you Agree


  • Total voters
    229

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
whats the point of these threads getting upped today?!!:what: yesterday's loss didn't prove any of the bullshyt T-Mac, Oscar, Oakley or any of ya NINETIEsexuals said:stopitslime:

Curry and the Warriors lost to the THUNDER. Westbrook, Durant and the rest of OKC are from the same ERA as Curry. If you trying to shyt on Curry with, you have to give credit to Westbrook who is, again, from the same era. In fact, this loss means the NBA is so competitive now that the 4th seed can beat the team that broke the wining record.


What does T-Mac know about conference finals anyway?:childplease:
How stupid are you that you still don't get the point? Obviously the athunder are from this era dumbass. The point is that they've been so successful handling because they've been so physical on defense. They're physicality on defense has thrown Steph and the Warriors completely off of their game. That's the exact argument that people you're calling "old heads" have been saying the whole season. The style of defense that the Thunder have played in this series wasn't allowed or employed during the regular season and that's the difference. This kind of defense was routine in the 90s now it's a rarity. Wen people pointed out that it would be different for GS if they had to deal with the physicality of previous eras they were dismissed and insulted. Now you're all seeing how valid the point is.
 

The_Third_Man

Superstar
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
6,917
Reputation
521
Daps
12,779
Reppin
NULL
How stupid are you that you still don't get the point? Obviously the athunder are from this era dumbass. The point is that they've been so successful handling because they've been so physical on defense. They're physicality on defense has thrown Steph and the Warriors completely off of their game. That's the exact argument that people you're calling "old heads" have been saying the whole season. The style of defense that the Thunder have played in this series wasn't allowed or employed during the regular season and that's the difference. This kind of defense was routine in the 90s now it's a rarity. Wen people pointed out that it would be different for GS if they had to deal with the physicality of previous eras they were dismissed and insulted. Now you're all seeing how valid the point is.
did you actually watch the video before you called me stupid?

T-Mac said:
“For (Curry) to be the first player to get (MVP) unanimously, I think it just shows you how watered down our league is. Seriously, because if you think about when M.J. played, Shaq, I mean, those guys really played against top-notch competition. More superstars I think on more teams than it is in our league today, but it’s well deserved, I mean, because he had a hell of a season.”

when did he say anything about physical defense? :stopitslime::stopitslime::stopitslime:(Curry is more of a shooter than slasher so I don't know how physical you can get with him ). Mcgrady was talking about the lack of superstars and weak competitions in this era which made it easy for Curry to win mvp unanimosouly.

If the Warriors swept their way to the championship and Curry destoryed every player he faced, it would've proved T-Mac's point. But The fact that the Warriors are down 1-3 in the conference finals and Westbrook outplaying Curry (and Llilard and Harden held their own before him) says otherwise. Westbrook had 2 historical seasons himself but he still couldn't win the MVP award because Curry was that good.

you get it now?
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
did you actually watch the video before you called me stupid?
Did you read your own post stupid?
whats the point of these threads getting upped today?!!:what: yesterday's loss didn't prove any of the bullshyt T-Mac, Oscar, Oakley or any of ya NINETIEsexuals said:stopitslime:
^^^This is what I was responding to and you're clearly not just talking about this T-Mac video. I'm telling you why the threads are being upped and why this series with OKC does prove that men like Oscar, Pippen, Oakley, Hubie, Jamal Crawford, Barkley, Nique, Harper, and all the other ex players/coaches who've echoed the "the current game is soft and easier for perimeter players" sentiments have a legit point. You only dismiss it as "bullshyt" because you're the one wth the agenda. It's funny how you modern day basketball cocksuckers like to try and flip that. You people are the one's with the agenda but you try and flip it on those who don't go along with it. We're just laughing that right now it's blowing up in your face. All that "GS is an all time great team Steph is the best" talk was premature and lacking context. "Old heads" tried to put all that shyt in its proper context and clowns like you have dismissed them just like you've done in the posts above.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,663
Reputation
10,029
Daps
111,314
Reppin
Brooklyn
:mjlol:

Exactly!
Not criticizing the league but these losers talking about zone defense making the league harder.

:mjlol::laff::laff::laff:
so you're arguing that only being allowed to double someone who has the ball makes it harder on stars? yeah the 2011 finals would have been so much harder for Miami if dallas was required by the rules to have a man tightly guarding mike bibby and joel Anthony at all times as opposed to shading over to guard LeBron or wade. yeah it's so much harder to score if defenders aren't allowed to come across the lane to double someone. #WPOY2016
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,243
Reputation
-612
Daps
92,159
so you're arguing that only being allowed to double someone who has the ball makes it harder on stars? yeah the 2011 finals would have been so much harder for Miami if dallas was required by the rules to have a man tightly guarding mike bibby and joel Anthony at all times as opposed to shading over to guard LeBron or wade. yeah it's so much harder to score if defenders aren't allowed to come across the lane to double someone. #WPOY2016

lebron lost that series more so than this dallas "zone" that clamped him.

Dallas hasn't even won a playoff series since then with that zone.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,663
Reputation
10,029
Daps
111,314
Reppin
Brooklyn
lebron lost that series more so than this dallas "zone" that clamped him.

Dallas hasn't even won a playoff series since then with that zone.
he didn't take over because they were doubling him every possession regardless if he had the ball or not. that's a key part of zone defense, and are you gonna seriously act like dallas has put together a roster that can actually compete in the playoffs since then? you really don't know much about basketball do you?
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,026
Reputation
26,392
Daps
380,078
so you're arguing that only being allowed to double someone who has the ball makes it harder on stars? yeah the 2011 finals would have been so much harder for Miami if dallas was required by the rules to have a man tightly guarding mike bibby and joel Anthony at all times as opposed to shading over to guard LeBron or wade. yeah it's so much harder to score if defenders aren't allowed to come across the lane to double someone. #WPOY2016
Not what I said.

Save that WPOY2016 award for that fuccboi who said Draymond was better than Rodman and could guard Kareem

:mjlol:
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,663
Reputation
10,029
Daps
111,314
Reppin
Brooklyn
Not what I said.

Save that WPOY2016 award for that fuccboi who said Draymond was better than Rodman and could guard Kareem

:mjlol:
you said zones don't make it harder. clearly there is countless video evidence that shows otherwise over the course of the last 15 years, and if you think a player who makes a huge impact on both ends of the floor is worse than one who is only useful on one end, then there's no point in continuing to try to talk any sense into you. stay living in your precious 90's with your floppy discs and vcr's
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,026
Reputation
26,392
Daps
380,078
you said zones don't make it harder. clearly there is countless video evidence that shows otherwise over the course of the last 15 years, and if you think a player who makes a huge impact on both ends of the floor is worse than one who is only useful on one end, then there's no point in continuing to try to talk any sense into you. stay living in your precious 90's with your floppy discs and vcr's
:coffee:

Zones don't make it harder.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
you said zones don't make it harder. clearly there is countless video evidence that shows otherwise over the course of the last 15 years, and if you think a player who makes a huge impact on both ends of the floor is worse than one who is only useful on one end, then there's no point in continuing to try to talk any sense into you. stay living in your precious 90's with your floppy discs and vcr's
The only impact that Draymond is making on either side of the court right now is a negative one. He's looking like he's a system player at this point. Rodman proves that he was a winner that could produce in multiple systems. To say that Draymond is better than he was is clearly premature.This is what happens when you jump out of the window to rush to crown/judge people.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
85,026
Reputation
26,392
Daps
380,078
The only impact that Draymond is making on either side of the court right now is a negative one. He's looking like he's a system player at this point. Rodman proves that he was a winner that could produce in multiple systems. To say that Draymond is better than he was is clearly premature.This is what happens when you jump out of the window to rush to crown/judge people.
:whew:
 
Top