PremierDaTruth
Oh well.
Glad I got to witness the goat win his final 2 rings even though I was only 7-8 years old I watched everyone of those finals games
Lowkey Steph Curry Shade thread
Ridiculousness
Honestly, there's more ground to cover in today's game. All the threes being shot today expands the ground a defense has to cover and wears guys down quicker. It's easier to trap a team with Vern Fleming at the point than all the studs at PG in today's game. Guys like Chris Paul, John Wall, Westbrook, etc. would torch that type of play.Watching the first video, and I can't help but notice the ball movement, spacing, hitting open shots, and most importantly......playing full court defense and trapping. Oscar was right about something....these coaches are very lazy when it comes to coaching defense. Just score and run back to your 3 point line an wait to get pick and rolled.
This doesn't even make any sense.I'm old enough to have watched Jordan play.
And those Piston "Jordan Rules" would have shut down these soft jump shooter players in this era too.
He's not right about shyt.Watching the first video, and I can't help but notice the ball movement, spacing, hitting open shots, and most importantly......playing full court defense and trapping. Oscar was right about something....these coaches are very lazy when it comes to coaching defense. Just score and run back to your 3 point line an wait to get pick and rolled.
He's not right about shyt.
He's completely off the mark - he's either ignorant to how far defensive schemes have come or ignorant because he doesn't watch enough games.
Of course it doesn't to you.This doesn't even make any sense.
It doesn't make sense, because you don't know what you're talking about. As per usual.Of course it doesn't to you.
You wouldn't understand because you don't watch basketballIt doesn't make sense, because you don't know what you're talking about. As per usual.
You're basically arguing that a defensive scheme that was designed to neutralize a single player by packing the paint, double teaming and switching (in effect leaving other players open) would be effective against teams full of players that can shoot from distance. That is retarded.You wouldn't understand because you don't watch basketball
That's not what I said.You're basically arguing that a defensive scheme that was designed to neutralize a single player by packing the paint, double teaming and switching (in effect leaving other players open) would be effective against teams full of players that can shoot from distance. That is retarded.