MICHAEL JORDAN SAYS IT AGAIN .. "KOBE > LEBRON..5 BEATS 3"

[Truefan31]

go ask that question to a knowledgeable outspoken oldhead in that 60 & up age range.

and watch them go off

most of them hate Jordan & david stern.




for that era, and the way teams were built - yes.

tell the whole story and stop acting like a fakkit.





Jordan won all his rings in the expansion era breh.

and no, that wasn't the best era for centers.

breh you said Horace Grant was part of a big 3, there's no spinning that. Then you tried justifying it w/some bs that anyone in their right mind who watched them play would know is bs. Now you trying to backtrack n add shyt "for that era, and the way teams are built...." nah mane. It's obvious you didnt' watch them like that. Please stop. I've already proven you wrong before.

Even Horace Grant would laugh at you for saying that shyt.

 

[Mars]

Jordan's great,but people give him more credit than he deserves.His defense was overrated.If it wasn't for S.Pippen guarding the primary wing players,Jordan's ass would've gotten lit up.What annoys me about Jordan is that in the past,when the media asked him "who is the greatest player ",he would always say,"I'll leave that up to the fans and media to decide".Now all of a sudden he wants to start ranking Kobe over Lebron as a way to protect his legacy.Jordan can't even evaluate talent properly.

Imagine what Durant would've done to his ass.Oh,I forgot,Scottie would've been guarding Durant,not Jordan.


The night Dominique dropped 57 points on Jordan....

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

Jordan's great,but people give him more credit than he deserves.His defense was overrated.If it wasn't for S.Pippen guarding the primary wing players,Jordan's ass would've gotten lit up.What annoys me about Jordan is that in the past,when the media asked him "who is the greatest player ",he would always say,"I'll leave that up to the fans and media to decide".Now all of a sudden he wants to start ranking Kobe over Lebron as a way to protect his legacy.Jordan can't even evaluate talent properly.

Imagine what Durant would've done to his ass.Oh,I forgot,Scottie would've been guarding Durant,not Jordan.


The night Dominique dropped 57 points on Jordan....

Can you go into your next chapter about how people give lbron more credit than he deserves?

 

[IllmaticDelta]

5 >>>>>>>>> 3*

Simple math for y'all dumb coli nikkas

4 mvps > 1mvp

3 finals mvps > 2 finals mvps

3 titles as the man > 2 titles as the man

..simple math for yall dumb coli nikkas

 

[Sccit]

4 mvps > 1mvp

3 finals mvps > 2 finals mvps

3 titles as the man > 2 titles as the man

..simple math for yall dumb coli nikkas

ALL THAT IS CIRCUMSTANCIAL THO . IF KOBE WAS IN BRONS SHOES, PLAYIN ON SUPERTEAMS OUT EAST, HED HAVE 8 TITLES AND 5 MVPS. ON THE CONTRARY, LEBRON PROLLY WOULDNT EVEN HAVE 1 RING PLAYIN OUT WEST WIT PAU AS A SECOND OPTION.

 

[Wacky D]

Don't like either of these nikkas, but in terms of legacy it's hard to argue with this. Depends on what you value you. Personally, give me results over excuses. Hard to consider a man the greatest who goes into Finals series' preemptively hyping up the other team/making excuses for when he loses in a couple of weeks. I just can't respect that mentality.

this stuff isn't even logical.

by your logic, you should be voting for the better winner.
other than that, just say that you simply respect kobe more and leave it at that.

you cant say kobe is better because LeBron shows humility in press conferences. that's just downright silly.

Lies. Name a crop of centers better than Ewing, Dream, Robinson, Shaq, Mourning, and Mutumbo.

the '70s was the best era for centers.

and I don't see the point of you bringing this up anyway.

the bulls never played dream or admiral in the playoffs.
they played a young shaq on a young magic team
ewing's 2nd option was john starks.
mutombo & mourning weren't landscape changers.

breh you said Horace Grant was part of a big 3, there's no spinning that. Then you tried justifying it w/some bs that anyone in their right mind who watched them play would know is bs. Now you trying to backtrack n add shyt "for that era, and the way teams are built...." nah mane. It's obvious you didnt' watch them like that. Please stop. I've already proven you wrong before.

Even Horace Grant would laugh at you for saying that shyt.

I didn't spin chit.

I said from jump they were a big 3 FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.........meaning by expansion era standards.

YOU WERE THE ONE trying to spin chit and kept trying to spin it for 5 pages. now youre trying to follow me around the board with this weirdo chit.

I'm bout to put you on ignore. go find a girl to talk to. chit is mad gay.

ALL THAT IS CIRCUMSTANCIAL THO . IF KOBE WAS IN BRONS SHOES, PLAYIN ON SUPERTEAMS OUT EAST, HED HAVE 8 TITLES AND 5 MVPS. ON THE CONTRARY, LEBRON PROLLY WOULDNT EVEN HAVE 1 RING PLAYIN OUT WEST WIT PAU AS A SECOND OPTION.

you don't even believe that yourself.

theres no logic to your posts.

just a bunch of stanning.

and you have the nerve to accuse people who aren't even fans, as stanning.

 

[Truefan31]

this stuff isn't even logical.

by your logic, you should be voting for the better winner.
other than that, just say that you simply respect kobe more and leave it at that.

you cant say kobe is better because LeBron shows humility in press conferences. that's just downright silly.





the '70s was the best era for centers.

and I don't see the point of you bringing this up anyway.

the bulls never played dream or admiral in the playoffs.
they played a young shaq on a young magic team
ewing's 2nd option was john starks.
mutombo & mourning weren't landscape changers.





I didn't spin chit.

I said from jump they were a big 3 FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.........meaning by expansion era standards.

YOU WERE THE ONE trying to spin chit and kept trying to spin it for 5 pages. now youre trying to follow me around the board with this weirdo chit.

I'm bout to put you on ignore. go find a girl to talk to. chit is mad gay.





you don't even believe that yourself.

theres no logic to your posts.

just a bunch of stanning.

and you have the nerve to accuse people who aren't even fans, as stanning.

yeah you mad cuz you're wrong. Horace Grant wasn't part of a big 3 in any era, you obviously didn't watch the Bulls in the 80s/early 90s. At no point was Horace Grant part of a big 3 breh. You tried spinning shyt saying Grant won a ring w/o MJ, when in reality Grant was a benchwarmer for the Lakers when he won one. Then you talked about some bs magazine cover which all that tells me is that again you didn't watch the Bulls then or else you'd know what you're saying is bs. Then you challenged me to name a better 3rd option then, which I did, and now you're still spinning shyt. You're wrong. Again, even Horace Grant would tell you you're full of shyt.

 

[Sccit]

this stuff isn't even logical.

by your logic, you should be voting for the better winner.
other than that, just say that you simply respect kobe more and leave it at that.

you cant say kobe is better because LeBron shows humility in press conferences. that's just downright silly.





the '70s was the best era for centers.

and I don't see the point of you bringing this up anyway.

the bulls never played dream or admiral in the playoffs.
they played a young shaq on a young magic team
ewing's 2nd option was john starks.
mutombo & mourning weren't landscape changers.





I didn't spin chit.

I said from jump they were a big 3 FOR THAT TIME PERIOD.........meaning by expansion era standards.

YOU WERE THE ONE trying to spin chit and kept trying to spin it for 5 pages. now youre trying to follow me around the board with this weirdo chit.

I'm bout to put you on ignore. go find a girl to talk to. chit is mad gay.





you don't even believe that yourself.

theres no logic to your posts.

just a bunch of stanning.

and you have the nerve to accuse people who aren't even fans, as stanning.

I DEF BELIEVE KOBE GOES 4/4 FROM 2011-2014 WIT WADE N BOSH PLAYIN OUT EAST .. NO QUESTION

 

[Wacky D]

yeah you mad cuz you're wrong. Horace Grant wasn't part of a big 3 in any era, you obviously didn't watch the Bulls in the 80s/early 90s. At no point was Horace Grant part of a big 3 breh. You tried spinning shyt saying Grant won a ring w/o MJ, when in reality Grant was a benchwarmer for the Lakers when he won one. Then you talked about some bs magazine cover which all that tells me is that again you didn't watch the Bulls then or else you'd know what you're saying is bs. Then you challenged me to name a better 3rd option then, which I did, and now you're still spinning shyt. You're wrong. Again, even Horace Grant would tell you you're full of shyt.

the bolded was clearly a joke and I corrected you on this like 10 times already. f*ck off fakkit.

you didn't name a better 3rd option, at best you dropped like one arguable name.

I DEF BELIEVE KOBE GOES 4/4 FROM 2011-2014 WIT WADE N BOSH PLAYIN OUT EAST .. NO QUESTION

kobe wouldn't even be able to co-exist with wade.

 

[Truefan31]

the bolded was clearly a joke and I corrected you on this like 10 times already. f*ck off fakkit.

you didn't name a better 3rd option, at best you dropped like one arguable name.





kobe wouldn't even be able to co-exist with wade.

breh you weren't joking or else you wouldn't have brought it up, just admit you're wrong cuz you didn't watch the bulls then. Cuz no real Bulls fan that watched them in the 80s/early 90s would put Horace Grant as part of a big 3

And I did name a better 3rd option, Dennis Rodman, then you were like "oh yeah that's right'' . You trying to tell me now that it's arguable between Rodman and Horace Grant breh?

You still don't get it. The idea of a big 3 didn't apply to those Bulls. It was MJ by far, then Scottie, then complimentary players.

 

[Wacky D]

breh you weren't joking or else you wouldn't have brought it up, just admit you're wrong cuz you didn't watch the bulls then. Cuz no real Bulls fan that watched them in the 80s/early 90s would put Horace Grant as part of a big 3

And I did name a better 3rd option, Dennis Rodman, then you were like "oh yeah that's right'' . You trying to tell me now that it's arguable between Rodman and Horace Grant breh?

You still don't get it. The idea of a big 3 didn't apply to those Bulls. It was MJ by far, then Scottie, then complimentary players.

@ the bolded - no chit Sherlock.
the idea of a big 3 didn't apply to ANY TEAMS back then. I said that from the very beginning DIKKHEAD.

and see youre twisting chit again. the joke was about the lakers, nearly a decade later.
this is the chit I'm talking about.

I never claimed that I watched them in the late 80s. what are you talking about?

well yea, rodman should've been understood tho, since he eventually played for the bulls and was an upgrade in the 2nd 3-peat. he still didn't cross my mind in this current exchange that we're having in this thread. are you gonna dwell on that too? besides, the rest of the pistons were aging, so their big 3 didn't have the same effect.

 

[Sccit]

the bolded was clearly a joke and I corrected you on this like 10 times already. f*ck off fakkit.

you didn't name a better 3rd option, at best you dropped like one arguable name.





kobe wouldn't even be able to co-exist with wade.

LOL KOBE AND WADE WOULD BE >> MJ AND PIPPEN

 

[McPiff]

LOL KOBE AND WADE WOULD BE >> MJ AND PIPPEN

 

[Bilz]

Kobestans want to ignore the shyt Jordan used to say about Kobe. As it became more obvious that Kobe would never touch Jordan's heights, Jordan's criticisms of Kobe turned into compliments. He now uses Kobe to compliment himself and defend his legacy against LeBron.

I don't think it's necessary nor do I think the idea of LeBron > Jordan is mainstream but Jordan is an a$$hole like that.

 

[Sccit]

TAKE THEM OUT YOUR AVATAR, FUCCBOY