Michael Wilbon: Black Folks and analytics don't mix

Are you Black? do you "like analytics?"

  • I am Black, African American, etc

  • I am not Black

  • I like & understand analytics

  • I don't have a use for analytics at all

  • I don't understand and don't want to understand analytics

  • I like or use analytics in moderation

  • Analytics is the best way to measure how good or bad someone or team is in sports

  • The Eye test is the best way to measure how good or bad someone or team is in sports

  • a mix of analytics and eye test is the best way to determin how good or bad someone or team is


Results are only viewable after voting.

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,573
Reputation
1,619
Daps
32,475
Reppin
Houston TX
Neither are accurate/ 100% reliable. It's best to use to combination of both to minimize the MOE.

I agree. Wilbon is a clown for writing this.

Teams like the Patriots and Spurs which have had long term sustain success both seem to embrace analytics on some level..but we out here trying to make it fashionable to act like it's cool to be above using them.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
57,909
Reputation
9,655
Daps
178,726
those who can....do. Those who can't....invent crutches to somehow compete.

Bruhs don't care about this mess.

You think a young Randy Moss cared about analytics? "Well when you throw the ball inside of 15-17 yards most players catch it 63% of the time ...blah blah blah"

Just throw me the ball deep and I'll get open. :manny:
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
What's with the constant strawmanning by the analytics detractors? I don't know anyone who lives or dies by analytics or who promotes looking at PERs instead of watching games.

Analytics doesnt have to include advanced stats and it doesn't have to revolve around efficiency. If you wanted a guy that could go one on one and score when contested, you could use analytics to identify those guys.

If you're on a team and you need an end of game play and there was a sheet that showed your bread and butter plays and how often each was effective, why wouldn't anyone want to use that?
You're the one who created the straw man here. Who said anything about hating analytics? Your whole post was based on some shyt nobody even said. The players spoke for themselves explaining how they felt about analytics. Did any of them say that they hated analytics? Who the are you arguing against?
 

The War Report

NewNewYork
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
53,164
Reputation
5,757
Daps
114,801
Reppin
The Empire State
Here's a lot of charts based solely on season numbers. Note, for example, how smooth the shooting charts are. If you really couldn't make an accurate assessment, then those shooting charts would be all over the place. But they're smooth as hell - which shows that on both offense and defense, the advanced analytics really are telling you what spots a player likes and (part of) what effect he's having on the game.

goldsberry-warriors-3.png


lebron_update.jpg

grant_r_kobe1213_shotchart_1152.jpg


cp3_chart_1152.jpg


grant_r_KevinDurant_ShotScore_1152.jpg


grant_r_ChrisBosh_ShotChart.jpg

grant_r_RussellWestbrook_ShotScore_1152.jpg



interior1152.jpg


jameshardenfixed1152.jpg


cp3_chart_fixed_1152.jpg




Also notice how the defensive shot charts are far more evenly distributed than the offensive shot charts? That shows you're seeing unique individual differences - while a single player on offense is taking his shots best and most frequently from a certain place, the defensive shots show that these choices are clearly different enough across the league that the distributions even out a lot.
Goldsberry da Gawd :blessed:
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
40,574
Reputation
-3,225
Daps
89,507
I'm exaggerating the relationship.. I've actually just met him twice.. But he remembered me and my son the 2nd time and talked to him for like 45 minutes in a hotel lobby.. He came off as 100% old school Chicago n1gga.. Cool as hell and dropped a lot of jewels on my son..

But if I run into him again I'll let him know that The Coli don't fukk with him...

nice deflection, but like I said, you want to co-sign for this dude and deflect for him.
If you want to do that and you were upset about me calling him a c00n, why dodge the his vilification of Sean Taylor? why dodge this poorly thought out and over generalized article, that if it had been written by Colin Cowheard would have had everyone rightly pointing out how offensive and poorly thought out it is to black americans.
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,740
Reputation
-1,003
Daps
5,345
I just realized he's got this nonsense on the front page of ESPN. I thought it was in his backbood blog or who knows what. I'm done with this.

This actually got under my skin. I'm not gonna wish death upon him, but he's dead to me.
 

jfkennedy

Best After Bobby
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
11,444
Reputation
1,121
Daps
18,739
Impossible. Your jaw is on notice too.

Man ... I better watch my back. :russ:

At any rate, my point stands. What he's saying Is accurate. Whether it's right to point it out is another question that y'all can argue about.

When I bring up stats at work when arguing sports I constantly get dismissed by 'eye-test' people. So, I understand where he's getting. And it means nothing in the context of what WE argue, but when it comes to us getting jobs then I think this is useful information.
 

duncanthetall

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
45,555
Reputation
4,551
Daps
150,847
Reppin
WHODEY/BIGBLUE/SNOWGANG/MIDNIGHTBOYZ
The disconnect is that everyone values and uses analytics. The only difference is some people prefer to do it in their head and some people prefer to use the hard numbers.

This is the root of what superstition comes from. We try to find correlations between inputs and outputs. Sometimes they are entirely false and the more we value perception over reality, the more we find ourselves doing things that don't actually work.

Look how often we kill the coach who runs up the middle every time on 3rd and 1, or punts every time from 4th and inches from midfield. The successful coaches go away from the conventional wisdom because they know from analytics what actually works.

When people say "I hate analytics" they are really saying "The unbiased data doesn't support my hunches and gut feelings so I reject it" Ironically, they are using analytics to come to that conclusion.
Righteous. Good post man
 

tone wone

That Dude!
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
394
Reputation
50
Daps
1,004
Reppin
501
The reason analytics are more prominent today is because there's a growing audience for them. I think its just another way for fans to connect to the game.
 

Bilz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,154
Reputation
1,355
Daps
37,335
Reppin
Los Angeles
You're the one who created the straw man here. Who said anything about hating analytics? Your whole post was based on some shyt nobody even said. The players spoke for themselves explaining how they felt about analytics. Did any of them say that they hated analytics? Who the are you arguing against?
Casual fans are the ones who get worked up about analytics. It should not be a controversial idea at all.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: ISO

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,107
Reppin
the ether
The reason analytics are more prominent today is because there's a growing audience for them. I think its just another way for fans to connect to the game.

Not because computer technology and video technology are an order of magnitude better than they were a couple decades ago?
 
Top