Microsoft Under Clocking Xbox One By 100-200mhz ( :laff: )

[Rekkapryde]

1.84 TFLOPS is not "clock speed"

I did said GPU clock speed, not CPU speed.

And I'm not the only one who refers to it in that way.

What you do you prefer? GPU processing power? GPU processing speed? Regardless, you know what I mean.

But back to your question, the clock speeds on the cpu for the AMD Jaguar APU for both systems is 1.6 GHz.

 

[VladTheImpaler]

Hold on! What's with the spelling and poor grammar? This can't be real....

 

[Rekkapryde]

courtdog loses again

and no one is reading all that shyt he posts either.

 

[GoldenGlove]

Bruh, what are you smoking on? This is what you said...

It's very clear who's the hardware manufacturer and who's the software company when you look at the PS3 and 360. I have more faith in Sony making a more reliable console than MS for obvious reasons.

You must be stupid...



I went and made the font bigger and even red for you.

I specifically say PS3 and 360 and your goof ass replies back with PS1 and PS2 statistics



I didn't read the rest of your post either.

Sorry.

 

[PS5 Pro]

We've seen PS3 get clowned hard for most of this generation for selling less than 360 in the US,inferior multiplats,inferior online setup, game like Final Fantasy,Tekken,DMC going to 360,etc...

PS3 owners are simply enjoying watching Xbots get a taste of their own medicine.

Basically what your saying is you was so furious

Look pal, The 360 is still selling more. Crazy amounts more. Now for sales to be equal as you like to believe, then in the UK sales of the PS3 would have to be dwarfing 360 sales to make up the gap from the US. Thats not the case, and was never really the case. It was only when the PS3slims came to market, but that was more so because of ppl upgrading vs an xbox that didn't have a new version yet. When the xbox slim launched, same shiit happened

Game still sell crucially less on ps3
Your online setup is still inferior, even worse since sony has no control over who wants to hack (Story Tru)
Tekken, DMC, Final Fantasy did come to Xbox. Whats hilarious is how once that was announced, 3cepts was like "Oh, but Final Fantasy Versus is the real Final Fantasy.. just look at it "

^^^ Shouldn't that last line be the wakeup call? ^^^

Or did that not happen

 

[Rekkapryde]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[PS5 Pro]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Did you forget you logged out Prince Hakeem

You must be stupid...



I went and made the font bigger and even red for you.

I specifically say PS3 and 360 and your goof ass replies back with PS1 and PS2 statistics



I didn't read the rest of your post either.

Sorry.

So I'm stupid, but you are claiming you replied to a post you didn't read

The PS1/2 stuff you claim you didn't read is why you are a dumbazz right now. What the fukk are we talking about? What you bolded in Red, made all big n shiiit? Ok, lets talk about that. Sony is the hardware, Micro is the software. Am I following you? You basing what each can do because your view goes back to PS3 vs 360. You don't want to look at all the evidence, you want a tunnel vision version so the truth isn't there, correct? FUKK outta here

Lets move it up then, Xbox slim vs PSslim. Which is more reliable?
Here's another thing. Since PS2 was this faulty ass system, you think sony could of even afforded to release a faulty ps3? Now microsoft is in that same position. You think they didn't learn? They paid 1 billion out of pocket to remedy the situation, you can't be that STUPID to think they'll have another heat sink issue The only faulty system Microsoft has ever made was launch 360's. Everything else been smooth. Sony can't say that about any of there products. PS/TV/Online/SonyPictures nothing (Story Tru)

 

[Rekkapryde]

So I'm stupid, but you are claiming you replied to a post you didn't read

The PS1/2 stuff you claim you didn't read is why you are a dumbazz right now. What the fukk are we talking about? What you bolded in Red, made all big n shiiit? Ok, lets talk about that. Sony is the hardware, Micro is the software. Am I following you? You basing what each can do because your view goes back to PS3 vs 360. You don't want to look at all the evidence, you a tunnel vision version so the truth isn't there, correct? FUKK outta here

Lets move it up then, Xbox slim vs PSslim. Which is more reliable?
Here's another thing. Since PS2 was this faulty ass system, you think sony could of even afforded to release a faulty ps3? Now microsoft is in that same position. You think they didn't learn? They paid 1 billion out of pocket to remedy the situation, you can't be that STUPID to think they'll have another heat sink issue The only faulty system Microsoft has ever made was launch 360's. Everything else been smooth. Sony can't say that about any of there products. PS/TV/Online/SonyPictures nothing (Story Tru)

 

[Champion]

@PS4
Nobody is trying hear you pour your heart out for Microsoft and their anti-consumer everything box breh.

 

[GoldenGlove]

So I'm stupid, but you are claiming you replied to a post you didn't read

Nah, I'll tell you what it's like going through a Courtdog post for me.

I'll read the first sentence and see where it's going. Then you'll put a break in or a smiley and I can sense that you're about to go on rambling with some spin job that's pathetic. So at that moment, I just stop reading.

Like that quote of yours up there right now? I promise you, that's the only part of your post that I read. I don't read all of your posts because it's not even worth it. Refer what was posted above this paragraph to understand how I go about dealing with you're posting.

 

[daze23]

I did said GPU clock speed, not CPU speed.

1.84 TFLOPS is not gpu "clock speed"

But back to your question, the clock speeds on the cpu for the AMD Jaguar APU for both systems is 1.6 GHz.

if MS underclocks that by 100-200mhz, they won't both be 1.6 ghz. same if Sony under or overclocks theirs. the point is neither company has confirmed or committed themselves to a particular clock speed, because these things are subject to change

the weird thing is that this kind of information even makes it's way out of internal testing

 

[Rekkapryde]

1.84 TFLOPS is not gpu "clock speed"



if MS underclocks that by 100-200mhz, they won't both be 1.6 ghz. same if Sony under or overclocks theirs. the point is neither company has confirmed or committed themselves to a particular clock speed, because these things are subject to change

the weird thing is that this kind of information even makes it's way out of internal testing

The point is that With the possibility of them having to reduce it due to the ESRAM yields, having MS drop the GPU processing speed to less than 1TLOP only increases the PS4's already big advantage in that area. :lookherebruh:

While neither has confirmed the official CPU clock speeds, the information from what others have gathered so far haven't indicated any change from the original 1.6 GHz cpu speeds on both consoles.

 

[daze23]

While neither has confirmed the official CPU clock speeds, the information from what others have gathered so far haven't indicated any change from the original 1.6 GHz cpu speeds on both consoles.

isn't this thread about a change in clock speeds?

 

[Rekkapryde]

isn't this thread about a change in clock speeds?

for the GPU not the CPU

 

[daze23]

for the GPU not the CPU

it doesn't specify

I'm not sure exactly how overclocking works on these integrated/single-chip things. I'm not sure if everything's on the same bus speed and/or what kind of multiplier system it has