Midterm Election

[Tony D'Amato]

they will try and keep pushing it , don't think they won't. if they get any momentum behind it they will try.

I doubt it. Just something to get rednecks to show up to the polls. And it worked. You're not gonna impeach Obama and make him sympathetic. That would be stupidity.

 

[Foxmulder]

they will try and keep pushing it , don't think they won't. if they get any momentum behind it they will try.

I hope they do.But I don't think even republicans are that stupid.

 

[Perfectson]

Are you serious right now?

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/05/05/3434120/oecd-income-inequality/
http://theweek.com/article/index/249441/charts-how-the-rich-won-the-great-recession
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/recovery-for-the-rich-rec_b_3910615.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/05/b...arger-as-slice-of-economy-as-wages-slide.html
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/03/27/3420092/corporate-profits-record-2013/

You have a complete lack of understanding on any of those links you posted, you know that right?

1st one isn't even about the American economy or are you going to say you were talking about the world economy.


the nytimes calculation is flawed since it's using a % of GDP as a comparator, which of course will of course draw out the disparity because you moved the corporate profits higher and it will naturally cause a lower employee %. YOu don't need to be an actuary to see that.

The rest of the link were trash as well.

go to the BOL and provide real support using raw data and prove your point.

industrial, real estate, economical indicators, all these have shown great improvement

wages paid, which some of your links pointed out have dropped but that's more or less due to the recession and the global policies that are now in place causing like for like jobs to be lowered.

non-farm payroll has increased after being negative during his first 4 years

so again, what you stated in your first posts is true. corporate profits are higher, lower interests, QE against inflation, and in general an international recovery saw to that. However, all segments of Americans have improved their livelihood the past 3 years.

 

[Regular_P]

All it did was make it so people like me have no faith left in blue dogs. Dems are in trouble. My generation is entirely demoralized. But Dems will not lose in 2016...you are going too far as always. People will show up for the opportunity to vote for the first female president.

The two party system does not work. It needs an overhaul that will never come.

 

[Skooby]

I hate this planet.

 

[you're NOT "n!ggas"]

I'm low-key mad at this shyt. and I wanna be mad at the Right, but the more I think on it I realize this is in large part is Obama's fight. There's no reason for the Democrats to be losing like this. Gas and Unemployment are down, Obamacare is successful, the stockmarket is booming. America is GOOD right now-- and that's ironically the problem. As great as America is, Obama STILL hasn't done shyt for blacks, for hispanics and immigration, etc. Aside from Obamacare, there's virtually nothing for the populace to rally behind like they did in '08 and '10. So people are like fukk it the Republicans bee all over it though, they're hungry. They want the throne back and this fool gave it to them on platter... I wish I could skip the next 2 years

 

[CACtain Planet]

Thom Tillis (R) defeats Kay Hagan...Repubs officially gain control of the Senate..

 

[Robbie3000]

@superunknown23

What's 2016 going to look like?

 

[JBoy]

“The Republicans … will try to make people believe that everything the Government has done for the country is socialism. They will go to the people and say: "Did you see that social security check you received the other day—you thought that was good for you, didn't you? That's just too bad! That's nothing in the world but socialism. Did you see that new flood control dam the Government is building over there for the protection of your property? Sorry—that's awful socialism! That new hospital that they are building is socialism. Price supports, more socialism for the farmers! Minimum wage laws? Socialism for labor! Socialism is bad for you, my friend. Everybody knows that. And here you are, with your new car, and your home, and better opportunities for the kids, and a television set—you are just surrounded by socialism! Now the Republicans say, ‘That's a terrible thing, my friend, and the only way out of this sinkhole of socialism is to vote for the Republican ticket.’"

 

[CACtain Planet]

@superunknown23

What's 2016 going to look like?

 

[Skooby]

Thom Tillis (R) defeats Kay Hagan...Repubs officially gain control of the Senate..

I'm glad I'm about to move from this state. fukk North Carolina.

 

[Skooby]

I'm low-key mad at this shyt. and I wanna be mad at the Right, but the more I think on it I realize this is in large part is Obama's fight. There's no reason for the Democrats to be losing like this. Gas and Unemployment are down, Obamacare is successful, the stockmarket is booming. America is GOOD right now-- and that's ironically the problem. As great as America is, Obama STILL hasn't done shyt for blacks, for hispanics and immigration, etc. Aside from Obamacare, there's virtually nothing for the populace to rally behind like they did in '08 and '10. So people are like fukk it the Republicans bee all over it though, they're hungry. They want the throne back and this fool gave it to them on platter... I wish I could skip the next 2 years

He can't please everybody. Wouldn't have mattered anyway. People who typically vote Democrat don't have high turnouts for mid-terms.

 

[Type Username Here]

You have a complete lack of understanding on any of those links you posted, you know that right?

1st one isn't even about the American economy or are you going to say you were talking about the world economy.


the nytimes calculation is flawed since it's using a % of GDP as a comparator, which of course will of course draw out the disparity because you moved the corporate profits higher and it will naturally cause a lower employee %. YOu don't need to be an actuary to see that.

The rest of the link were trash as well.

go to the BOL and provide real support using raw data and prove your point.

industrial, real estate, economical indicators, all these have shown great improvement

wages paid, which some of your links pointed out have dropped but that's more or less due to the recession and the global policies that are now in place causing like for like jobs to be lowered.

non-farm payroll has increased after being negative during his first 4 years

so again, what you stated in your first posts is true. corporate profits are higher, lower interests, QE against inflation, and in general an international recovery saw to that. However, all segments of Americans have improved their livelihood the past 3 years.

Right in the first link you just ignored:

These trends have been particularly pronounced in the United States. Here, 47 percent of total income growth between 1976 and 2007 went to the top 1 percent, one of the biggest increases among OECD countries. They earned 20 percent of total income in 2010, the highest share out of the 34 member countries. In 2012, the wealthiest 10 percent took homehalf of the country’s total income, the largest share ever recorded.

Not, they have not. You are the only one who has not provided any source. You are making baseless claims.

 

[Tony D'Amato]

Florida aint getting enough attention. They re-elected a criminal and voted against medical marijuana

 

[Mac Milli]

Democrats need to understand that 2008 and 2012 wins were about Obama. Obama won't be on the ticket in 2016...