She was an art history teacher apparently.
If she was teaching a class specifically on Islamic Art, showing historical depictions of Mohammed would be fair game. Even then it's only responsible to have a disclaimer to all students that plan to take the course, that potentially upsetting images would be shown.
But if you're just teaching Art History 201, the subject is long and wide enough (going back thousands of years, hundreds of cultures) that to find time to show a depiction of Mohammed... You're just looking for attention. And she got some.
She could have done the following instead:
1. Include links to depictions of Mohammed in supplementary material
2. Just speak on it
3. Gotten tenure first.
But she didn't. Dumb ass.
You don’t think it’s ok to just ask and give a generic warning before sensitive/offensive material to the class in general before each lesson?
Singling out Muslims and being extra careful for them alone would be also a problem.
History is full of bad things and stuff people don’t know about until they learn it. Most who know still would rather not talk about or see until it’s right in front of them.
And religion is a big part of that history so in order to teach history I think you gotta ask students to leave their religious beliefs at the door.
Just like during the class on Christianity/Jesus the teacher had to be super careful not to offend in a majority NON Christian audience (I think most college age Americans are atheists) but still covered everything
Students could walk out of the room if they get made or debate after class with the professor on the topic but you can’t actually stop class and dictate the lesson or tell the teacher what he can’t do in a class you pay to attend..... you’re just kinda in for the ride.
