For various reasons. Some of those reasons are obvious, other reasons not as obvious as you think.
regardless of the reason it does happen
Also:
Lower cost for consumer goods
Increase in economic productivity
it definitely lowers costs of consumer goods
the increase in economic productivity depends on what type of worker the immigrants is, low skilled workers do not increase productivity, high skilled immigrants do
The problem is your situating the issue as a "this" or "that" scenario. It's the same as the "you're either with America or against it" argument. What if I support economic benefits PLUS increasing opportunities for unskilled working natives to excel as high-skilled workers?
i dont know what that means that you support, i support feeding all the hungry children of the world, you can support anything you want
my point is that studies show low skilled immigration lowers wages and displaces low skilled native workers, it dosnt matter what you support, that is what studies show
and you already posted that if you can pay somebody lower wages you would and its not your problem if the native worker demands more money, so yo already exposed what you think about people that get displaced by low skilled labor, you think its a good thing
I think immigration should be reasonably controlled as well but for various reasons.
if you agree that immigration should be controlled then we agree
But evidence and research indicate that there is extremely little competition between native workers and immigrant workers.
actually no it doesnt, there is little competition if there is little immigration
and again you just exposed yourself that you would pay 10 dollars and lower wages if you could, and that the native workers are lazy, so your own example shows that there is competition
A corporation's main goal is to make profit so they will always find a way to earn it. But what research has shown that immigrants have been or has been pushing native unskilled workers out of the work force? Also, who's to say these companies will drastically alter their operations to stay in business if they are not able to rely on immigrants to do the work that natives won't?
pretty much every study has shown that immigrants displace and lower wages for low skilled workers, the reason why people get away with saying it doesnt is that they ignore or downplay the impact on low skilled workers and emphasize the increase in the size of the overall economy and the fact that it does help high skilled workers that are not competing with immigrants
in other words, overall immigrants have little impact, but when you break it down by skill level the lower skilled workers get screwed